Astron. Astrophys. 320, 8-12 (1997)
1. Introduction
If QSOs have redshifts entirely of cosmological origin and are
randomly distributed in space, we shall expect to find very few very
close pairs with very different redshifts. The number depends on the
surface density of QSOs, , and the number of
fields that have been examined (N), so that the number expected
by accident n is given by
![[EQUATION]](img4.gif)
where is measured in arc seconds and
is the number per square degree.
Thus when the first QSO pair 1548+115A,B was discovered (Wampler et
al. 1973), it was considered to be a strong argument in favor of
non-cosmological QSO redshifts: its two components have separation of
, and their redshifts are .
The probability to find such a close pair of QSOs among the
QSOs then identified was estimated to be about
1% if QSOs are distributed randomly on the sky.
In the following years the number of QSOs
with measured redshifts has increased to more than 7000 (cf Hewitt
& Burbidge 1993). Also the gravitational lens phenomenon has been
discovered and several close pairs with identical redshifts are known
(see Keeton & Kochanek 1996 for a recent compilation of
gravitationally lensed QSOs and candidate systems). Added to this are
a number of double QSOs with nearly identical redshifts which are
likely to be genuine QSO pairs and not lensed pairs since their
spectra are not identically equal (cf Schneider 1994). These pairs are
usually attributed to the spatial two-point correlation between
QSOs.
Comparatively recently three more very close pairs with very
different redshifts have been discovered. In Section 2 we describe and
discuss them and look at the probability that they are accidental
configurations. In Section 3 we discuss all of the possible
interpretations and implications of the results.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 3, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |