Astron. Astrophys. 321, 123-128 (1997)
4. Discussion
The decrease of the variability amplitude with increasing
wavelength observed in the present QSO sample is consistent with the
results obtained for individual objects at low redshift by Edelson et
al. (1990), Kinney et al. (1991), Paltani & Courvoisier (1994). Is
this variability-frequency correlation sufficient to account for the
positive correlation between redshift and variability found in Paper I?
Let us assume a simple power-law representation of a typical QSO
spectrum (Giallongo et al. 1991, Di Clemente et al. 1996):
![[EQUATION]](img55.gif)
where is the flux at an observed wavelength
, an arbitrary wavelength
and the spectral index. The variability can
then be modeled as a change in the spectral index:
![[EQUATION]](img60.gif)
where is a function of time. In this way the
flux variations are idealized as changes in the slope of the power-law
"hinged" on the point of wavelength , that we
imagine somewhere redwards of the B and R bands.
Converting in magnitudes,
![[EQUATION]](img63.gif)
we obtain the following expression for the magnitude variations:
![[EQUATION]](img64.gif)
Applying the same equation to the B-band, we can write:
![[EQUATION]](img65.gif)
From Eq. 7 we would expect a decreasing ratio
with increasing redshift. In the present data
we observe, if any, a very small decrement of
with the redshift (from to
for two sub-samples with redshift
and respectively).
Introducing the value of at a
reported in Sect. 3 in Eq. 7, allows us to
put a lower limit to the wavelength
Å.
If we turn back to Eq. 6, we can see how this lower limit to
, together with the typical observed RMS for the
variability and of 0.35
and 0.28 mag, respectively (see Fig. 2), puts an upper limit to
the RMS variation of the spectral index .
This value can be compared with the typical dispersion in the
spectral indices observed in various QSO samples: Pei et al. (1991)
have obtained in a control sample of 15 QSOs,
Francis (1993) observed in a much larger
sample, showing also a systematic hardening of the spectrum with
increasing redshift. In this way the dispersion in the observed
spectral indices of the QSO population can be only partially accounted
for by variability and significant intrinsic differences between QSO
and QSO have to be invoked (but see also the dispersion
estimated by Elvis et al., 1994).
Putting in Eq. 6 our best estimates for
and Å, we obtain for the typical RMS
variability in the B band 0.26 and 0.33 mag at
and , respectively and
0.22 and 0.30 in the R band at the same redshifts, consistent
with the observations of Paper I.
The dependence of the variability time scale on the wavelength is a
standard prediction of the accretion disk model. The temperature of
the disk decreases with the radius, and the dynamical, thermal and
viscous time scales all increase as (see
Baganoff & Malkan 1995 and references therein). In particular, in
the standard model, involving instabilities in a thin accretion disk
around a supermassive black hole, the intrinsic characteristic time
scale should vary as . More in general, if the
source is thermal and if the flux variability is due to temperature
changes, the observed wavelength dependence can be naturally produced
(Paltani & Courvoisier 1994). The only requirement concerns the
turnover in the spectral energy distribution that should not be
located at such a high frequency that the spectral slope in the
observed band becomes independent of the temperature (e.g. the
Rayleigh-Jeans domain for a black body spectrum). As remarked by Di
Clemente et al. (1996), if brighter objects are on average hotter and
the variability is due to temperature changes, one would expect a
negative correlation between amplitude of the variability and
luminosity, as observed. Assuming for example a spectrum of black body
or thermal bremsstrahlung, the spectral turnover of brighter objects
is progressively shifted at higher frequencies producing progressively
smaller flux changes, from for
, to for
.
The broad-band variability in the starburst model (Aretxaga et al.
1996 and references therein) is defined by the superposition of a
variable component, supernova explosions (SNe) generating rapidly
evolving compact supernova remnants (cSNR), and a non-variable
component, a young stellar cluster and the other stars of the galaxy.
The problem of predicting the wavelength dependence of the variability
can be reduced to computing the spectra of the variable and
non-variable components, and their relative luminosities. The spectrum
of the non-variable component has been predicted to show a
with (Cid Fernandes
& Terlevich 1995). The variable/non-variable relative luminosities
can also be estimated on the basis of stellar evolution (Aretxaga
& Terlevich 1994). Much more difficult is to predict the
optical/UV spectrum of the variable component. It is expected to be
harder than the non-variable component with a
and . We can model the total QSO flux according
to a Simple Poissonian model (Cid Fernandes et al. 1996) as
![[EQUATION]](img93.gif)
where is the non-variable fraction of the
total flux and , are the
slopes of the non-variable and variable components. Indicating with
and the effective
wavelengths of the B and R-band and putting for simplicity
, we obtain for the ratio between the B-band and
R-band variability:
![[EQUATION]](img100.gif)
with .
For example, with and
respectively (Cid Fernandes et al. 1996), the ratio between the B-band
and R-band variability is expected to be about 1.4 at
, tending to 1 for increasing redshift,
independent on the intrinsic luminosity of the QSO. The above reported
slight tendency for a decreasing ratio with
increasing redshift is compatible with this model. However, an
increase of the with the absolute luminosity is
also observed. We find the values and
for two subsamples with
( ) and
( ), respectively. This
suggests that more general situations have to be envisaged in which
the fraction on the non-variable component and/or the pulse properties
(e.g. the spectral distribution) depend on the global luminosity of
the object.
Recently Hawkins (1996) has proposed that the variability of nearly
all the QSOs (except the very low redshift ones) is produced by
microlensing. A non-achromatic behaviour can be accommodated in this
kind of model. For a source comparable in size to the Einstein ring of
the lens, with a quasar disk redder at larger radii, the bluer compact
core would produce a larger amplitude of the variations in the blue
passband whereas the larger extent of the red image would cause a
small amplitude variation, albeit with a longer duration, in the red.
However it cannot be denied that achromatic light variations would
have been one of the most significant characteristics of the
microlensing model and the present observation of the wavelength
dependence make it less appealing/compelling. In particular the
superposition of the two competing effects of time dilation and
correlation of the variability with frequency, i.e. redshift, accounts
naturally, also in the accretion disk and in the starburst scenarios,
for the observed lack of correlation in the observer's rest frame
between the variability time scale and the redshift, otherwise claimed
as an evidence in favor of the microlensing model.
Future detailed comparisons between simulated and observed light
curves will be fundamental to disentangle among these three scenarios
and to start exploring the parameter space of each model.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: June 30, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |