Astron. Astrophys. 321, 643-651 (1997)
2. Observations
We analysed sunspot observations obtained during an observing run
in 1991 with the 70 cm Vacuum Tower Telescope (VTT) located at
the Observatorio del Teide, Izaña. A fairly regular medium
sized sunspot (NOAA 6681) was selected with a diameter of about
showing a considerable number of UDs in the
slit-jaw pictures. Observations were made on June 19, when the spot
was located at cos .
The Echelle-Type spectrograph of the VTT was used to obtain
spectrograms in two different spectral regions at
630.25 nm and
846.85 nm. A large format (1024 1024
pixel) CCD camera with a pixel size of 19 microns squared recorded the
data set in 2 2 summing mode. With the image
scale of the spectrograph in the focal plane of
per mm the spatial FOV was with a pixel size of
. The spectral FOV is 0.2 nm due to the
linear dispersion of the spectrograph of about 0.1 nm/cm in the
red part of the visible spectrum. Raster scans of the sunspot were
obtained by moving the solar image across the spectrograph. For the
630.25 nm (
846.85 nm) line the spot was scanned in 16 (14) steps of
0.5 arcseconds. The slit width was 80 µm
corresponding to on the sun and the exposure
time was 0.2 (0.4) seconds. With a step to step time of 5.4 seconds
the repetition time for the rasters amounts to 86 (76) seconds.
The small size of UDs makes them difficult to track although the
seeing conditions were quite good. Imperfect positioning of the slit
during the exposure can cause a dot to disappear from the spectrogram.
The data set we obtained consists of several time series taken first
at 846.85 nm and then at
630.25 nm.
Fig. 1 shows two spectrograms of the observed wavelength
regions and the spatial variation of the normalized intensity profiles
on the left of them. The two scans do not represent the same cut, but
they are from the same spot. On the blue side of the
630.25 nm line no data are available.
![[FIGURE]](img13.gif) |
Fig. 1. Line profiles along the slit and corresponding spectrogram. The lowermost profile was recorded at a position of 18.7 arcseconds in the corresponding spectrum, the following ones in steps of 1.87 arcseconds. Left: 846.85 nm, CUD1 sequence; right: 630.25 nm, CUD2 sequence. In both spectra the umbra is inserted in a different intensity scale. The position of the extracted line profiles is marked in the corresponding spectrogram. The thick lines are UD line profiles and their location in the spectrogram is marked with an arrow.
|
Since the spectra of the two lines were not recorded
simultaneously, it was not possible to compare the umbral features in
different wavelengths directly, thus no field gradient could be
derived, neither in the UD nor in the inter-dot regions.
2.1. Line characteristics
The two Fe I lines are well suited for magnetic field
measurements since both have an effective Landé factor of 2.5
and split into a simple Zeeman triplet. Unlike the
630.25 nm line the
846.85 nm line has an asymmetry in
the -components, due to the presence of a
Ti I blend whose wavelength and line strength are not exactly
known (see Fig. 1). The -component is
deformed, indicating that the blend is somewhat shifted to the red
part relative to the Fe I line. Thus we cannot exclude that the
blend may have an influence on the strength of the
-component seen in the
846.85 nm line. The Ti I line has a rather complicated
splitting pattern with a of 1.125. The
variation of the line profiles along the slit (see Fig. 1)
indicates that the blend gets stronger with increasing magnetic field
strength and with decreasing temperature.
Although the presence of the blend complicates the analysis of the
846.85 nm line, these observations
represent independent measurements of the same sunspot region. We
expect to gain information about higher photospheric layers than from
the 630.25 nm line. The
characteristics of the observed lines and some observational
parameters are summarized in Table 1.
![[TABLE]](img19.gif)
Table 1. Some relevant parameters of the observed lines.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: June 30, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |