![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 321, 643-651 (1997) 4. Line profile calculationsWe calculated synthetic line profiles and fitted them to observed line profiles in order to derive the magnetic field strength. Therefore we used a Stokes diagnostic code described by Grossmann-Doerth et al. (1988) and Grossmann-Doerth (1993). This version employs the DELO-method for solving the Unno-Rachovsky equations (Rees et al. 1989) numerically and provides the line depression contribution functions necessary to infer the formation height of the absorption line under consideration. The computations were all done with plane parallel models of either the quiet or the active (e.g. umbra, penumbra) solar atmosphere. We used the photospheric model T93 of Schleicher (1976), the penumbra model of Ding & Fang (1989), the umbral model M4 of Kollatschny et al. (1980) and in addition two umbral models IAC-C and IAC-H corresponding to "cool" and "hot" spots (Collados et al. 1994). Following the matrix technique described by Balthasar & Schmidt (1993), we computed synthetic line profiles for field values from 0 to 3100 G with 50 G increments and for angles between 0 and 90 degrees with 10 degree steps. In all calculations we applied a field gradient of 2 G/km (Pahlke & Wiehr 1990). This results in a matrix of line profiles, whose entries are compared with the observed profiles. 4.1. Oscillator strengthsUnlike to the In a first approach the value for the weighted oscillator strength
of the neutral titanium line given by Vakulenko & Savanov (1990)
was adopted. We assumed the solar Ti abundance to be at log
Table 2. Atomic parameters of the lines at 4.2. Formation height of the linesThe determination of height levels in UDs is a difficult task, limited by the lack of information about the actual temperature and pressure stratification for the different umbral regions. In order to overcome this, the observed umbral and UD line profiles are compared with the computed synthetic profiles from the different model atmospheres. We regarded those model atmospheres for further use which reproduce best the observed profiles and give the right continuum intensity ratio of umbra to photosphere. These were used to derive the height levels of the continuum and the line core. M4 reflects best the situation inside the darkest part of the umbra while the profiles of the quiet sun are best reproduced by the model T93. Fig. 3 (middle) shows an umbral line profile taken from the darkest part of the umbra (dashed) and the corresponding synthetic profile (solid). The direct measurement yields 2700 G, whereas the comparison with synthetic line profiles gives an actual field strength of about 2900 G.
Contribution functions (CF) were used to extract the information
about the line-forming layers. The weighted center h of the CF
is determined for the continuum ( Table 3 summarizes the results derived from line profiles
representative for the quiet sun and the umbra. In the umbra as well
in the unperturbed photosphere the continuum of both lines forms near
the level where the continuum optical depth Table 3. Height levels of the observed lines inside the umbra and outside the spot. Calculations for the quiet sun and the umbra were done with the model T93 and M4 respectively; The comparison with the other model atmospheres reveals that the
IAC-H model of Collados et al. (1994) matches best the UD line
profiles. The temperature stratifications used for the calculations of
the synthetic line profiles are displayed in Fig. 3 (left). The
resulting formation heights are listed in Table 4. Both, the
emergent contiuum intensity and the line depression of the CUD2
( Table 4. Formation heights of the UDs, derived from the IAC-H model; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: June 30, 1998 ![]() |