![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 321, 776-790 (1997) 5. DiscussionIn this section we will make a comparison between the behaviour as found for GS 2023+338 with the behaviour found in other BHCs. 5.1. Comparison of the power spectra with those of other Black Hole CandidatesThe overal power spectral shape of GS 2023+338 (see
Fig. 8 and 9) is somewhat like that of Cyg X-1, GX 339-4, and
GS1124-68 in the low (hard) state (see Miyamoto et al. 1992). It can
be described by an (almost) flat part below frequencies of
However, there are some differences: GS 2023+338 does not show
the above-described Belloni-Hasinger effect as seen in data from Cyg
X-1. There is no clear change visible in the power spectra of
GS 2023+338 with respect to the level or cut-off frequency of the
flat top, although the intensities are different by a large factor
(see also Miyamoto et al. 1993a). Another difference with respect to
Cyg X-1 is that the power spectrum is steeper at higher frequencies
(above From Belloni and Hasinger (1990) it appears that in the power
spectrum of Cyg X-1 a bump around Summarizing we can say that we are beginning to see small differences (e.g. the frequency of the "bumps" or the steepness of the spectra) in the power spectra of different BHCs. It will be interesting to study those subtle differences between these sources in more detail. The power spectra observed during the early stages of the outburst
(and thus at high count rates) (PC spectrum 1A, and both MPC3 spectra)
differ from the power spectra observed in other black-hole candidates.
They contain a large amount of variability ( The power spectrum observed at the highest peak of the outburst (May 30 data), shows an additional component near 0.04 Hz (Fig. 11). This power spectrum looks similar to that of Cyg X-1 as obtained with Sigma data (Vikhlinin et al. 1994). This power spectrum of Cyg X-1 has been obtained in its low state and shows a peak around 0.05 Hz. This peak can either be labeled broad low-frequency QPO or "peaked" low-state noise. Since in GS 2023+338 the peak is only observed once we can not study its behaviour in more detail. It is clear that around maximum intensities the shape of the power spectrum changes, but it does not develop into a very-high-state spectrum (which is characterized by very strong band-limited noise with a cut-off frequency in the range from 1 to 10 Hz and QPO with a frequency between 2-10 Hz and sometimes harmonics), since no evidence for 2-10 Hz QPO is present (we estimate an upper-limit of 4% in the 2-10 Hz range). The upper limit is not very strict since a lot of variability is present in this source and small deviations from the global shape of the power spectrum have to be fitted with a relatively strong QPO component. This upper limit is not very different from the observed strength of the QPO in e.g., GX 339-4: 4-5% (Miyamoto et al. 1991). It is remarkable that although GS 2023+338 reaches very high
count rates and high luminosities (Tanaka [1989] concluded from the
saturation of the light curve near the peak that the Eddington
luminosity was reached) the power spectrum is remarkably similar to
that of other BHCs in the low-state (spectrally hard). Only when the
source is at its peak the power spectrum (and also the energy
spectrum) changes, but certainly does not resemble a power spectrum of
other BHCs in either the high (soft) or very-high state. Tanaka (1989)
reached a similar conclusion from a spectral analysis which showed
that the intrinsic spectrum of GS 2023+338 was always a power law, and
did not show the ultra-soft component usually seen in the high and
very-high states of BHCs. There are two possible differences with
other sources which could explain this behaviour. The first is
that GS 2023+338 is known to have a very massive compact object
( The other possibility is at different inclination of the source. It
could well be that a different viewing geometry is present, and
therefore a different part of the region around the compact object is
observed. However, although there are suggestions (see Van der Klis
1995b), little is known about the effects of inclination on the
observed variability behaviour. An inclination of
5.2. Energy dependence of the variabilityFrom Fig. 13 (panel "1 non-high") we conclude that during the early stages of the outburst the variability below 7 keV diminishes (see also Oosterbroek et al. 1995), which is explained by Tanaka (1991) as caused by the presence of a diluting soft component which is not variable itself. From the rms spectra (Fig. 13 and 14) we conclude that changes
in Since we find that the Where If we take as the change in The ionization parameter Low-energy absorption takes place for this leads to a radius of 6-40 light seconds, as the minimal radius
where enough absorbing material can be orbiting the compact object.
This is well inside the system since the semi-major axis equals
If the above is a correct interpretation of the rapid changes of
the column-density, then the opening angle of the disk must be at
least ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: June 30, 1998 ![]() |