![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 322, 73-85 (1997) 3. Analysis of a single particle evolutionThis section is dedicated to a careful examination of the evolution of a test particle. 3.1. Parameters defining the shockFor comparison purposes, we adopt the same particle as in TDA, i.e.
a particle entering their model labeled E at
3.2. The evolution schemeThe evolution of a particle along the bowshock can be divided into several stages according to the locally prevailing physical process. Note that the relative lengths and importances of each stage vary from particle to particle and depend as well on the bowshock parameters. We distinguish the following stages: 3.2.1. Thermal ionization stage.Just after being shocked, the particle still has the same ionization state as the ambient gas while having reached a temperature beyond 106 K. A fraction of the thermal energy of the gas is being used to raise the ionization level. This leads to an extremely high initial cooling rate (see Fig. 4). This stage is very short (less than 0.5 pc in curvilinear abscissa, i.e. less than 5.103 yr) as the particle rapidly reaches ionization levels consistent with its temperature (see Fig. 5).
3.2.2. Pressure driven stage.Once the ionization stage ends, the gas retrieves the low radiative cooling rates typical of a hot, low density plasma. Therefore, the cooling of the particle is ruled by the decreasing pressure field. In this pressure driven stage, the gas cools slowly as its pressure and density decrease. The length of this region depends strongly on the initial temperature and density of the particle. Note, that for the extreme case of very high velocity bowshocks in low density surrounding gas, the density decrease can actually inhibate the radiative cooling term (which varies roughly as the square of the density), leading to very extended pressure driven stages. 3.2.3. Catastrophic cooling stage.As the temperature falls and reaches a few 105 K,
the radiative cooling engine races. The temperature decrease is not
balanced any more by the pressure decrease, which leads to a fast
increase in density which itself accelerates the cooling and so
depresses ever more rapidly the temperature. The final compression
factor of the gas is determined by the magnetic field whose pressure
(which varies as the square of the density) can in some cases dominate
the gas pressure. During this catastrophic cooling stage, the gas
cools down to temperatures around 5 103
-104 K within a few parsecs only, releasing
radiatively within a very thin zone what remains of its thermal
energy. The salient features of this stage are seen in the T,
3.2.4. Photoionization stage.The cool, high density gas leaving the catastrophic cooling zone
rapidely reaches thermal equilibrium (balance between radiative
cooling and photoionization heating by the nuclear radiation). The
density decreases slowly ( 3.3. Ionic populations and line emissivitiesThe 'mean ionization'
1 degree of several
elements (O, N, C, Fe, Ca and Mg) as a funtion of the curvilinear
abscissa is given in Fig. 5, together with the individual ionic
fraction of three ions of astrophysical interest covering a wide range
of excitation (Fe XIV, Fe VII
and O III). Prominent features in these curves
are: the spike (at the beginning) associated with the thermal
ionisation stage and the fast change of population related to the
catastrophic cooling stage ( 3.4. Cooling lengthAs the catastrophic cooling zone (see Sect. 3.2.3) is
associated with a large increase in density, we have defined the
cooling position of a particle, To make a more direct comparison with TDA, we have configured
another test model which conforms strictly to TDA's model by using the
same cooling rates, post-shock assumptions and the pure, fully ionized
hydrogen assumption (i.e.,
The striking difference between the evolutionary tracks of our
complete model (Figs. 4 and 5) and those of TDA (Fig. 6) in which
simplified physical assumptions have been used is noteworthy. For
instance, for the same test particle, our complete model and TDA's one
lead to 3.5. Influence of post-shock conditions equations
Our set of post-shock condition equations differs from the one of TDA
(see Sect. 2.4). This leads, for a given Mach number, to a higher
temperature and a lower density. In order to estimate the impact of
such a change on the fate of the particles, we now compare the above
model (Fig. 6) which closely reproduces TDA's model E, with
one which uses our post-shock conditions but keep TDA's simplified
cooling function (allowing us to get rid of the influence of using
different cooling functions). Temperature and density evolutions for
the same test particle as before are displayed in Fig. 7. We
derive cooling lengths more than twice as long than those of TDA. We
emphasize this difference in
3.6. Out of equilibrium versus equilibrium ionizationTDA assumed 'Collisional Ionization Equilibrium' (hereafter CIE)
for the ionization balance of oxygen. This can be contrasted with the
more physical non CIE assumption as implemented in our model (for each
element listed in Sect. 2.1) and in which any particle's
evolution depends on its past history and on the rates of change of
each ionic specie (see Sect. 2.6.2). Within the zones of high
radiative cooling (i.e., in the range 2.105 K to
105), when non CIE effects are taken into account, we find
a mean ionization degree of the ions which is systematically higher
(memory effect) than in the case of CIE (see Fig. 9). This can at
times strongly reduce the efficiency of radiative cooling, lowering
the cooling rate of the gas by more than a factor two as, shown in
Fig. 8 (see also Sutherland & Dopita 1993). The cooling
lengths
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: June 30, 1998 ![]() |