Astron. Astrophys. 322, 175-176 (1997)
1. Introduction
The Vela supernova remnant has been detected in radio, optical and
x-ray wavelengths. Recently low energy gamma rays have been detected
by De Jager, Harding and Strickman (1996) using the OSSE detector
aboard the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory. The energy range of
observations is between .044 and 0.765 Mev. These gamma rays have been
attributed by the observers to emission from the central compact
region around the Vela pulsar.The gamma ray flux together with the
x-ray flux from the central compact region forms a power law spectrum.
This emission is interpreted by De Jager, Harding annd Strickman
(1996) as synchrotron emission from high energy electrons. The
Universal microwave background photons can scatter from these high
energy electrons by the inverse Compton process to give high energy
gamma rays. Harding (1996) had calculated this flux using the x-ray
flux measured by the ROSAT satellite and finds a value of
photons cm-2 s-1 at 1 TeV.
The observations of OSSE imply the existence of electrons with energy
higher than those implied by ROSAT satellite observations, and it
seems worthwhile calculating the flux again. The high energy gamma ray
flux estimated (Yoshikoshi, 1996)from observatios using the 3.8 m
telescope of the CANGAROO collaboration , is
photons cm-2 s-1 above 2.5 TeV.
The x-ray spectrum is of the form , where
is the energy in ergs cm-2
s-1 Hz-1, is the frequency
of the x-ray photon and K and are constants. If
this spectrum is produced by the synchrotron process, then the
electron spectrum is of the form , where N(E) is
the number of electrons of energy E and K' and p are constants. The
indices and p are related as
. K' is given by (Lang,1980)
![[EQUATION]](img9.gif)
where (p) is a slowly varying function given
by Lang and B is the perpendicular component of the ambient magnetic
field. The spectrum of the Universal microwave background is of black
body form with temperature K. Then the
scattering of these photons by the high energy electrons through the
inverse Compton process yields high energy gamma ray photons. The
power of the high energy photons per unit volume and unit energy is
given by (Rybicki and Lightman,1987)
![[EQUATION]](img12.gif)
Here is the electron radius,h is the Planck
constant, c is the velocity of light and k is the Boltzmann constant.
is the energy of the scattered photon in ergs.
C is related to K' by the relation
![[EQUATION]](img15.gif)
where m is the mass of the electron and V is the volume of the
synchrotron emitting region. F(p) is given by (Rybicki and Lightman,
1987),
![[EQUATION]](img16.gif)
where is the Gamma function ,
is the Riemannian Zeta function with the given
arguments and
![[EQUATION]](img19.gif)
To obtain the spectrum of the photon flux at the earth we have to
multiply the power in the scattered high energy photons given above by
the factor . (It is interesting to note here
that the multiplication of the synchrotron power by this factor makes
the calculation independent of the distance d to the source and also
of the emitting volume V).
The observed low energy spectrum is given by De Jager, Harding and
Strickman (1996) as
![[EQUATION]](img21.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img22.gif)
This can be converted to the form given
above using the appropriate constants. De Jager, Harding and Strickman
(1996) give an average magnetic field of gauss
in the region. Using these and the temperature of the Universal
microwave background as , we have calculated the
spectrum of the high energy photons which is given by,
![[EQUATION]](img26.gif)
The integral spectrum is then
![[EQUATION]](img27.gif)
with in ergs. The flux of gamma rays with
energy greater than 2.5 Tev is photons
,which is in agreement with observation
considering the uncertainties in the values of the parameters used
(see below).
The calculated flux is dependent on the values used for the x-ray
flux, the x-ray spectral index and the magnetic field. The predicted
gamma ray flux is directly proportional to the x-ray flux. The high
energy photon flux is dependent on the magnetic field through K`. An
increase in the value of B by a factor of two will decrease the high
energy photon flux by a factor of 3.5. The flux of gamma rays is not
very sensitive to the spectral index.
High energy gamma ray flux from the Vela supernova remnant can also
arise from scattering of background optical and infrared photons by
the high energy electrons through the inverse Compton process.The
galactic integrated starlight photon density (Toller, 1990) is lower
by a factor of about compared to the microwave
background photon density,which is barely compensated by the increase
in the number of the lower energy electrons (factor of about
) which scatter the optical photons into the
high energy gamma ray region; this contribution may just about equal
that produced by the scattering of the microwave photons; the exact
value depending on the value of the optical photon density near the
Vela supernova remnant, which is difficult to estimate. The
contribution of the galactic background infrared photon scattering
from the high energy electrons can be calculated using the results of
Fazio, Dame and Kent (1990). The infrared photon density is about
of the microwave photon density and the
increase in the electron density again does not compensate for this
reduction. The infrared photon density in the nebula may again be
higher than implied by the average infrared brightness given by Fazio,
Dame and Kent (1990), so that the process of inverse Compton
scattering may contribute to the high energy gamma ray flux. However
the near agreement of the flux obtained from the scattering of the
microwave photons with the observation suggests that the scattering of
optical and infrared photons may not contribute substantially to the
high energy gamma ray flux.
The Janzos Air Shower Array has been used to search for high energy
gamma rays with energy greater than 100 Tev; no flux was found (The
Janzos Collaboration,1995) and an upper limit of
cm-2 s-1 was given. This
flux limit is above the flux expected at this energy from this
calculation.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: June 30, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |