SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 322, 523-532 (1997)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

2. Propagation of VHE [FORMULA] -ray in the radiation field of a massive star

Let us assume that VHE [FORMULA] -ray photon with energy [FORMULA] is injected a distance [FORMULA] from the center of a massive star and propagates at an angle [FORMULA], measured from the direction to the star (see Fig. 1). The star has a radius [FORMULA] and emits black body radiation with temperature [FORMULA]. The picture is axially symmetric with the main axis covering with the direction [FORMULA]. If the star is very luminous and the [FORMULA] -ray is injected relatively close to its surface, it may create an [FORMULA] pair in collision with soft star photons. The secondary [FORMULA] pairs lose energy on different processes but, in the case when the inverse Compton scattering (ICS) of star photons dominates, the cascade in an anisotropic radiation field can develop (Fig 1). In the following subsections we discuss the conditions for such a cascade to occur.

[FIGURE] Fig. 1. Schematic view of the development of a cascade initiated by [FORMULA] -ray photon in the soft radiation field of a massive star. The [FORMULA] -ray ([FORMULA]) escapes from a ' [FORMULA] source', which is at a distance [FORMULA] from the center of a massive star, at an angle [FORMULA]. It produces an [FORMULA] pair ([FORMULA]) in collision with the massive star thermal photon ([FORMULA]). The [FORMULA] pair emits secondary [FORMULA] -rays ([FORMULA]) in the inverse Compton scattering process of soft star photons. These secondary [FORMULA] -rays may: (a) escape form the system, (b) collide with the massive star surface, or (c) create next [FORMULA] pair ([FORMULA]). The process continues up to the moment when all secondary [FORMULA] -rays escape from the system or collide with the star surface, and all secondary [FORMULA] pairs cool.

2.1. Optical depth for the [FORMULA] -ray photon in the radiation field of a massive star

The optical depth for the [FORMULA] -ray photon propagating in the soft photon field can be computed following the formula given by Gould & Schreder (1967). The way how to compute it in our specific case of the anisotropic soft photon field coming from the star surface is shown in Appendix A. Here we present some results of the numerical computations of the optical depth for the parameters of a massive star which seems to be characteristic for close massive binaries (see e.g. Moffat & Marchenko 1996). Fig. 2a shows the dependence of the optical depth for the [FORMULA] -ray photon with energy [FORMULA] eV on the angle of photon injection [FORMULA] for selected distances [FORMULA] from the star. As expected, the optical depth is higher for larger values of the angle [FORMULA] up to the moment of collision of the photon path with the star surface. If the injection angle [FORMULA] passes the angle at which the star limb is seen ([FORMULA]), the optical depth drops drastically. For [FORMULA], the optical depth decreases slightly because the propagation distance of the [FORMULA] -ray photon to the moment of collision with the star surface becomes shorter but the geometrical effects do not play important role in such a case. The optical depth decreases with the distance of injection of [FORMULA] -ray photon from the star surface [FORMULA] for small angles [FORMULA] but the maximal value of the optical depth, corresponding to the marginal collision with the star surface, increases with [FORMULA] because of the propagation distance in the star radiation is higher. In Fig. 2b the dependence of the optical depth on the energy of [FORMULA] -ray photon is shown for selected angles of photon injection [FORMULA]. As expected from the kinematics of the ICS process, the maximum in the optical depth shifts to lower [FORMULA] -ray photon energies and its absolute value increases with increasing angle [FORMULA], if [FORMULA], where [FORMULA] for the parameters in Fig. 2b. For the angles [FORMULA], the location of the maximum in the optical depth do not change with energy of the [FORMULA] -ray photon since the [FORMULA] -ray propagates towards the surface of the star. However the value of the optical depth drops for higher [FORMULA] since the propagation distance of [FORMULA] -ray photon from the place of its injection up to the collision with the star surface is shorter.

[FIGURE] Fig. 2. a The optical depth for the [FORMULA] -ray photon with energy [FORMULA] eV in the soft radiation of a massive star, as a function of the angle of photon injection [FORMULA]. The star has the radius [FORMULA] cm and the surface temperature [FORMULA] K. The specific curves correspond to different distances of injection of the primary photon from the center of a star [FORMULA], and [FORMULA]. b The optical depth for the [FORMULA] -ray photons, as a function of their energy [FORMULA], which are injected at the distance [FORMULA]. Specific curves correspond to different angles of photon injection [FORMULA].

Based on the computations of the optical depth we are able to determine the observable parameters of massive stars (its luminosity [FORMULA] and surface temperature) for which the absorption of the [FORMULA] -rays can become important. The optimal absorption conditions occur for the [FORMULA] -ray photons, with energy [FORMULA], which propagate along the path tangent to the star limb. This photon energy [FORMULA] is approximately given by the threshold condition for the absorption of [FORMULA] -ray, [FORMULA], where [FORMULA] is the electron mass and k is the Boltzman constant. The optical depth for the [FORMULA] -ray photon is proportional to [FORMULA] and the star luminosity to [FORMULA]. Therefore, the star parameters has to fulfil the following condition,

[EQUATION]

provided that the optical depth is equal to one for the limb crossing [FORMULA] -ray. In this relation [FORMULA] is expressed in erg s-1, [FORMULA] in Kelvins, and A is a constant weakly dependent on the distance [FORMULA] above [FORMULA]. The value of A has been computed numerically and is plotted in Fig. 3 as a function of [FORMULA]. The [FORMULA] -ray photons with energies above the threshold for [FORMULA] pair production in collision with soft photons can be absorbed in the radiation field of the massive star if its luminosity [FORMULA].

[FIGURE] Fig. 3. The dependence of A on the distance [FORMULA] from the center of a star.

2.2. General conditions for the development of an ICS cascade

The ICS cascade can be initiated by a VHE [FORMULA] -ray in the vicinity of a specific massive star if the ICS losses of secondary [FORMULA] pairs dominates the electron losses on synchrotron and bremsstrahlung processes. The ratio of ICS [FORMULA] pair losses in the Thomson limit to synchrotron losses is determined by the energy densities of the star radiation [FORMULA] and the magnetic field [FORMULA]. At the star surface is given by

[EQUATION]

where [FORMULA] is the magnetic field at the star surface (in Gauss), and [FORMULA] is the dilution factor of the star radiation which for isotropic electrons can be defined as a part of the sphere which is obscured by the star. For the star surface [FORMULA]. The ICS losses dominates if the star surface magnetic field is

[EQUATION]

However, this limit is valid only in the Thomson regime. In general case, we have to compute the ICS losses of electrons in the radiation of a massive star using the full Klein-Nishina cross section. The comparison of these losses with the electron losses on synchrotron process gives the limit on the star magnetic field ([FORMULA]) which is more restrict for the electrons with very high energies. This critical value of [FORMULA] is shown in Fig. 4 as a function of electron's energy, after its normalization to [FORMULA].

[FIGURE] Fig. 4. The dependence of the surface magnetic field of a massive star, below which the ICS losses of electrons dominates over the synchrotron losses, on the electron energy [FORMULA]. The magnetic filed is normalized to the value of the magnetic field for which the ICS losses of electrons in the Thomson regime are equal to their synchrotron losses.

The upper limits on the surface magnetic field of massive stars are of the order of a few hundred Gauss, for OB stars (Barker 1986), up to [FORMULA] G, for the Wolf-Rayet stars (Maheswaran & Cassinelli 1988). The magnetic field of the stars drops with distance as [FORMULA], for the stars with strong winds, or even faster, e.g. if the star magnetic field can be considered as a dipole (Weber & Davis 1967; Usov & Melrose 1992). So then, if the radiation energy density dominates on the star surface, it has to dominate above the star surface as well. For example, for the parameters of the massive star in Cyg X-3 system (Moffat & Marchenko 1996): [FORMULA] cm, [FORMULA] K, the ICS losses in the Thomson limit dominates over synchrotron losses if [FORMULA] G. This value is above the observational limits on the surface magnetic fields of Wolf-Rayet stars.

It is necessary to check also if for typical parameters of massive companions, the electron energy losses on bremsstrahlung process do not dominate the ICS losses. Since the wind density and the radiation density drops with the distance from the star in this same way ([FORMULA]), it is enough to compare these losses at the star surface. It can be simply derived that the ICS losses in the Thomson limit dominate for electrons with the Lorentz factors

[EQUATION]

where [FORMULA], [FORMULA], and [FORMULA] are the radius (in cm) and the surface temperature of the massive star, its wind velocity (in cm [FORMULA]), and the mass loss rate of the star (in [FORMULA]), respectively. Applying the typical parameters of the Wolf-Rayet stars, used above, and assuming the wind velocities of the order of [FORMULA] km [FORMULA], and [FORMULA], we obtain that Eq. (4) is fulfilled for electrons with arbitrary Lorentz factors. So then, the bremsstrahlung losses of electrons are negligible in comparison to ICS losses.

In our picture we assume that the secondary cascade electrons are isotropised locally, i.e. in the place of their birth. It is true if the distance scales [FORMULA] for the ICS energy losses of secondary electrons are longer than their Larmor orbits [FORMULA] in the local magnetic field, [FORMULA]. This condition is fulfilled if the local random magnetic field,

[EQUATION]

For example, for [FORMULA] K, [FORMULA] (corresponds to the minimal value of [FORMULA], which is on the border between the Klein-Nishina and the Thomson regimes), and for [FORMULA], the magnetic filed has to be [FORMULA] Gs. If the scattering of the star photons by secondary electrons occurs in the Klein-Nishina regime, the electron attenuation length and the Larmor radius increases in a similar way with the electron Lorentz factor [FORMULA], and [FORMULA]. This means that if the condition for isotropisation of electrons is fulfilled in the Thomson limit (Eq.  5), it has to be valid in the Klein-Nishina regime as well.

To summarise, our picture for the ICS cascade, developing in the radiation field of a massive star, is valid for the massive stars with the surface magnetic field limited by Eq. (3) and (5), and if the secondary [FORMULA] pairs have the Lorentz factors above [FORMULA] (Eq.  4).

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997

Online publication: June 5, 1998

helpdesk.link@springer.de