![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 322, 576-590 (1997) 1. IntroductionSymbiotic stars are characterized by the simultaneous occurrence in an apparently single object of two temperature regimes differing by a factor of 30 or more. The spectrum of a symbiotic star consists of a late type (M-) absorption spectrum, highly excited emission lines and a blue continuum. Generally, symbiotic stars are interpreted as interacting binary systems consisting of a cool luminous visual primary and a hot compact object (white dwarf, subdwarf) as secondary component. Because of mass loss of the giant there is often a common nebulous envelope. Mass transfer from the cool to the hot component is expected. An extensive review on the properties of symbiotic stars can be found in Kenyon (1986). Many symbiotic stars show outburst events at optical and UV wavelengths. Though several models have been proposed to explain these outbursts, it is the combination of quiescent properties and these outburst properties which make it difficult to derive a consistent picture for some symbiotics. The symbiotic star AG Draconis (BD Here, we use all available ROSAT data to document the X-ray light curve of AG Dra over the past 5 years. In addition, we report on the results of the coordinated ROSAT /IUE campaign during the 1994/1995 outbursts. Preliminary results on the IUE and optical observations were given by Viotti et al. (1994a, 1994b). After a description of the relevant previous knowledge of the AG Dra properties in the optical, UV and X-ray range in the remaining part of this paragraph, we present our observational results in paragraph 2-4, discuss the various implications on the AG Dra system parameters in paragraph 5 and end with a summary in paragraph 6. 1.1. AG Dra: the optical pictureLike in most symbiotic stars, the historical light curve of AG Dra
is characterized by a sequence of active and quiescent phases (e.g.
Robinson 1969, Viotti 1993). The activity is represented by 1-2 mag
light maxima (currently called outbursts or eruptions)
frequently followed by one or more secondary maxima. It has been noted
(Robinson 1969, Iijima et al. 1987) that the major outbursts occur in
Between the active phases AG Dra is spending long periods (few
years to decades) at minimum light (V In June 1994 Graslo et al. (1994) announced that AG Dra was
starting a new active phase which was marked by a rapid brightening
from V=9.9 to V=8.4 on June 14th, and to 8.1 on July 6-10, 1994. After
July 1994 the brightness gradually declined reaching the quiescent
level (V The optical spectrum of AG Dra was largely investigated especially
in recent years, during both the active phases and quiescence. The
spectrum is typical of a symbiotic star, with a probably stable cool
component which dominates the yellow-red region, and a largely
variable "nebular" component with a strong blue-ultraviolet continuum
and a rich emission line spectrum (e.g. Boyarchuk 1966). According to
most authors the cool component is a K3 giant, which together with its
large radial velocity (-148 km s-1) and high galactic
latitude ( 1.2. AG Dra: the UV pictureThe hot dwarf companion is a source of intense ultraviolet radiation which produces a rich high-temperature emission line spectrum and a strong UV continuum. AG Dra is in fact a very bright UV target which has been intensively studied with IUE (e.g. Viotti et al. 1983, Lutz et al. 1987, Kafatos et al. 1993, Mürset et al. 1991, Mikolajewska et al. 1995). Ultraviolet high-resolution spectra with the IUE satellite
revealed high-ionization permitted emission lines such as the
resonance doublets of NV, CIV and SiIV. The strongest emission line is
HeII The origin of this feature is unclear. It can either arise in the red-giant wind ionized by the hot dwarf radiation, or in some low-velocity regions of the hot component's wind. The UV continuum and line flux is largely variable with the star's activity. Viotti et al. (1984) studied the IUE spectra of AG Dra during the major 1980-1983 active phase, and found that the outburst was most energetic in the ultraviolet with an overall rise of about a factor 10 in the continuum, much larger than in the visual, and of a factor 2-5 in the emission line flux. A large UV variation was also a characteristics of the minor 1985 and 1986 outbursts (e.g. Mikolajewska et al. 1995). 1.3. AG Dra: the X-ray pictureFirst X-ray observations of AG Dra during the quiescent phase were
done with the HEAO-2 satellite (Einstein Observatory) before
the 1981-1985 series of eruptions (0.27 IPC counts/sec). The spectrum
was found to be very soft (Anderson et al. 1981). The data are
consistent with a blackbody source of kT=0.016 keV (Kenyon 1988) in
addition to the bremsstrahlung source (kT=0.1 keV) suggested by
Anderson et al. (1981). The X-ray temperature of A comparison of the X-ray flux with the observed HeII
EXOSAT was pointed on AG Dra four times during the 1985-86
minor active phase, which was characterized by two light maxima in
February 1985 and January 1986. These observations revealed a large
X-ray fading with respect to quiescence (Piro 1986), the source being
at least 5-6 times weaker in the EXOSAT thin Lexan filter in March
1985, and not detected in February 1986 (Viotti et al. 1995).
Simultaneous IUE observations have on the contrary shown an increase
of the continuum and emission line flux, especially of the high
temperature NV 1240 A and HeII 1640 A lines at the time of the light
maxima. According to Friedjung (1988) this behaviour might be due to a
temperature drop of a non-black body component, or to a continuous
absorption of the X-rays shortwards of the N ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: June 5, 1998 ![]() |