![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 322, 674-678 (1997) 2. Numerical method and results2.1. General procedureIn order to compute the Lc from an atmosphere, we must treat the full non-LTE problem, that is, to solve iteratively the equations describing the radiative transfer, statistical equilibrium, hydrostatic equilibrium, and particle conservation. Particularly, when the atmosphere is bombarded by an electron beam, the deposited energy causes nonthermal excitation and ionization of the hydrogen atoms. The rates of these nonthermal collisional transitions are to be added to the radiative and thermal collisional rates in the statistical equations. A four-level-plus-continuum atomic model for hydrogen is adopted here. The method is similar to that of Fang et al. (1993), where a detailed description about the energy deposition rate and the nonthermal collisional excitation and ionization rates is presented. To study the Lc signatures under different flare processes, we modify the model atmosphere in a parametrized way. Based on the results of semiempirical flare models, it is known that their most significant modifications relative to the quiet-Sun model are both a temperature rise in the upper chromosphere and a downward shift of the transition region, which may result from the evaporation of chromospheric material into the corona (see e.g., Gan & Fang 1987). In what follows, we consider these two processes and the nonthermal effect independently to show what kinds of Lc emissions would be produced respectively. It should be mentioned that, solar flares certainly involve a drastic change of the coronal temperature structure, but it has little influence on the Lc emission as the hydrogen atoms are fully ionized there. Therefore, we will not discuss this issue here. 2.2. Effect of chromospheric temperature riseWe start from the quiet-Sun model VAL-C presented by Vernazza et
al. (1981) and later modified by Avrett et al. (1984). The
flare-induced temperature rise
From Fig. 1, it is easily found that the chromospheric
temperature rise tends to increase the absolute Lc intensity, as
expected. However, the effect of varying 2.3. Effect of transition region shiftTo show the effect of the downward shift of the transition region,
we fix the T versus It is shown that a larger A realistic flare model should incorporate the above two processes. For comparison, we also plot in Fig. 1 by dotted lines the results for flare models F1 and F2 from Machado et al. (1980), which clearly show a combination of both effects of the temperature rise and the transition region shift. Note that our computed Lc intensities for models F1 and F2 are consistent with the results given by Avrett et al. (1986), although different computation codes have been used. 2.4. Effect of nonthermal electron beam bombardmentNow we turn to the case when there exists a precipitating electron
beam causing nonthermal excitation and ionization of the hydrogen
atoms. We assume a power law distribution for the energy spectrum of
the beam electrons with a lower energy cut-off at 20 keV. The Lc
intensities are then computed for the quiet-Sun model imposed by
electron beams with various energy fluxes
It is shown that the effect of nonthermal excitation and ionization
caused by the electron beam greatly enhances the Lc. The most
noticeable phenomenon is that the curve gradient tends to increase
significantly with increasing energy fluxes. Therefore, a lower color
temperature should be detected if there exist such nonthermal effects.
For a quantitative comparison, we have further computed the color
temperatures from the resulting spectra at One can also find that the energy flux is the main factor determining the enhancement of the Lc intensity. Comparatively, the effect of varying the power index is less pronounced though also very clear. We will further discuss this problem in Sect. 3.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: June 5, 1998 ![]() |