![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 322, 962-974 (1997) 5. CO isotope ratio, excitation, and
|
![]() |
Fig. 7. Line profiles of 13 CO J=1-0 emission observed at 4 positions directly North and South of ![]() |
12 CO J=1-0 emission toward Oph
cannot be too optically thin unless it is very different from that
seen in absorption. Adopting the column density and rotational
populations recently measured in uv -absorption leads to values
for the integrated optical depth of the J=1-0 line which are 0.9-1.4
km s-1. If the optical depth is distributed over an
intrinsic profile which resembles the CO emission (which itself is
very similar to the absorption-line profiles of species besides CH
), the peak optical depth is 1.2-2.0. The higher
optical depth corresponds to an excitation temperature of 4.5 K and a
1.2 K emission line brightness, the lower to an excitation temperature
slightly over 6 K and a CO J=1-0 emission line which is perhaps
somewhat brighter (
K) than observed. For the
excitation solution with
, the isotopic
abundance ratio should be (only) 40% larger than the intensity
ratio.
At the position South, the linewidths (FWHM)
of the stronger J=1-0 components are
km s-1 and
km s-1 for
12 CO and 13 CO respectively. If the weaker line
is optically thin, this difference in linewidth can be explained
entirely if the line center optical depth in 12 CO is in
the range 2.0-2.5. This scant difference in width precludes heavy
saturation of the 12 CO profile and eliminates those
excitation solutions in which the temperature is low and the carbon
isotope ratio is as large as, say, 167 (Lambert et al. 1994)
2. We conclude that
the emission measurements are consistent with the very large
12 CO/13 CO ratio found in optical absorption
toward the star, but that such a large ratio is not characteristic of
the immediately adjacent gas sampled in emission
away; the 12 CO optical depth is too
small.
The 13 CO lines are strong enough in some positions so
that might hope to detect C18 O. If the 13
CO/C18 O intensity ratio were found to be unusually small,
this might support a supra-terrestrial 12 C/13 C
isotope ratio. A search for C18 O by Kopp et al. (1996)
yielded N(13 CO)/N(C18 O)
5 at one position. Our data (Table 2)
South of the star yield a value
for the ratio
of line strengths at the 3-
level. Given the
low optical depths in both lines, this intensity ratio cannot differ
greatly from that of the abundances themselves.
The weak rotational excitation and low thermal pressure
K , inferred from the small CO J=1-0
excitation temperature toward the star (Smith, Krishna Swamy, and
Stecher 1978; Liszt 1979) are confirmed by mm-wave emission
observations of the unseen CN (Crane et al. 1989) and CO J=3-2 lines
(van Dishoeck and Black 1991) but not by a comparison of the
12 CO J=2-1 and J=1-0 emission lines (Crutcher and Federman
1987). Although there is a fair range of ratios in the literature, the
thermal pressure inferred from a comparison of the two lowest CO lines
is typically p/k =
K. Similar or slightly
higher pressures may be derived from the uv absorption-line
column densities of Lambert et al. (1994) who found excitation
temperatures of 3.9
, 4.6
and 6.3
K for the
lowest three rotation transitions. These excitation temperatures would
produce an easily-detectable (
K) J=3-2 line,
in substantial disagreement with the results of van Dishoeck and Black
(1991). Much weaker excitation and lower gas pressure are implied by
the analysis of other uv absorption-line data of Lyu et al.
(1994).
It seems undeniable that the CO profiles have wide swings in
integrated intensity under conditions where neither
nor N(CO) changes much. Toward the star,
N(
)/
K km s-1
(K km s-1)-1, which is
2-3 times larger than typically-employed values. However, at the
emission peak to the South, the CO is four times stronger and the CO
intensity-
column density ratio is
unexceptional or even somewhat low. This suggests that the common
value is established fairly soon after CO emission turns on (Liszt
1982), even while N(CO)/N(C
)
.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: June 5, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de