 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 323, L17-L20 (1997)
3. Results and Discussion
For the 9 sources observed in this experiment the projected
baseline ranged from 600-800 M (at 215 GHz),
which is equivalent to fringe spacings of 0.26 - 0.34 mas. In
Table 2 we summarize the signal-to-noise ratios and the flux
densities. Column 1 & 2 of Table 2 give the source names;
column 3 the redshift; column 4 & 5 the total flux density at 215
and 86 GHz, respectively; column 6 the number of VLBI scans with
significant detections; column 7 & 8 the SNR as obtained
after integration over the full scan from standard fringe search
(FRINGE) (col. 7) and from incoherent fringe search (SEARCH) (col.
8).
The difference of the SNR -values in columns 7 & 8 is
the following: for the standard fringe search (FRINGE) without search
windows the typical detection threshold is
which, however, can be reduced to by setting
smaller search windows. For the incoherent fringe search (SEARCH) the
SNR depends on the number of coherent segments and the search
area of rate and multi-band delay. In this experiment we averaged for
each 6.5 min scan over about segments and
searched over a rate-delay grid of 10 mHz
µs. Under these conditions significant detections have a
.
In column 9 we give for each source the correlated flux density at
215 GHz. For comparison we give also in col. 10 the correlated flux
densities obtained at 86 GHz for 7 sources in another (longer)
VLBI-observation performed on March 7-8, 1995 on the same baseline.
The range of correlated flux densities does not only reflect the
uncertainties of the amplitude calibration, which is of order of
at 215 GHz ( at 86 GHz),
but also includes variations most probably caused by source structure.
We note, however, that because of the small number of VLBI scans and
the remaining calibration uncertainties it is difficult to
discriminate between systematic effects from the telescope (eg. focus,
pointing, gaincurve), the atmosphere (eg. anomalous refraction, see
Altenhoff et al. 1987), and intrinsic variations of the
visibilities.
In the experiment we observed 9 sources and clearly detected 6 with
signal-to-noise ratios of up to a factor of 4 higher than in the
previous 1.4 mm experiment (Greve et al. 1995). For 3C 273 and 3C 279
we confirm the previous detections. In addition to the 6 clearly
detected sources, we marginally detected the sources 3C 345 and
SGR A*. The observations of SGR A* at 86 and 215 GHz will be discussed
in a separate paper. The source 4C39.25 is not detected, while the
source 2145+067 detected by Greve et al. (1995) was not observed
again. The detection limit at 215 GHz is determined by the lowest
correlated flux density in col.9 of Table 2, i.e.
Jy, which is in good agreement with the
theoretical expectation based on the antenna parameters of
Table 1.
In the following we define the degree of compactness of a source by
the ratio of correlated flux to total flux ( ).
For the investigated sources we derive from Table 2 a
compactness, which ranges between % at 215 GHz
and % at 86 GHz. At 215 GHz, the most compact
sources are 3C 279, 1334-127, and 1749+096 with C
. Since most of the sources exhibit complex
structures on sub-mas scales (eg. jets and multiple compact
components), the variations of C can be partially attributed to
variations of the visibility functions. However, it appears that on
average the compactness of the sources at 215 GHz is lower than the
compactness at 86 GHz and lower than that typically seen at
cm-wavelengths ( ). In view of the overall
calibration uncertainties and the limited uv-coverage (changes of the
visibility function with hour angle could lead to underestimates of C
in snap shot type observations) this result must be regarded with
caution.
The snap shot type 1.4 mm VLBI observations of 3C 279 of December
1994 and March 1995 were performed at similar ( )
interferometer hour angles (I.H.A.). This allows a direct comparison
of the correlated flux densities, which show an increase by nearly a
factor of 2 (at I.H.A.= 4.5 h), from 2.2 Jy to 3.8 Jy between both
epochs. Such an increase is also seen in the compactness, which
increased from C=0.21 to C=0.35, although the total 215 GHz flux
density changed only from 10.5 Jy to 11.0 Jy. The 86 GHz VLBI map
obtained in March 1995 showed a secondary jet component at
mas core separation (Krichbaum, unpublished
data). Although the observed variation of the visibility amplitudes
and of the compactness are not completely outside the range set by the
calibration uncertainties, motion of a jet component (at a speed of
mas/yr typical for 3C 279 (eg. Carrara et al.
1993)) could easily explain the observed changes of the correlated
flux densities.
A similar behaviour is also seen in 3C 273. In contrast to 3C 279,
however, the compactness of 3C 273 decreased from C=0.14 in December
1994 to C=0.08 in March 1995, while the total flux density decreased
from 13.5 Jy to 9.2 Jy. Within a mutual hour angle interval I.H.A.= 2
- 3 h, where data from both epochs are available, the correlated flux
density decreased from 1.0 Jy in December 1994
to 0.4-0.7 Jy in March 1995. On sub-mas scales 3C 273 shows a
prominent jet with components separating from the core at a typical
speed of mas/yr (eg. Krichbaum et al. 1990).
Again, variations of the correlated flux density and the compactness
over timescales of a few months must be expected. In fact, recent 3 mm
VLBI monitoring of 3C 273 shows the ejection of a new jet component
between January 1994 and March 1995 (Krichbaum et al. 1996). It is
worthwhile to note that the relative strength of the changes of the
visibility amplitude and the compactness in 3C 279 seem to be larger
than in 3C 273, although 3C 273 showed more pronounced variations in
total flux density and exhibits a higher angular expansion rate. One
possible reason for this may be a more complex sub-mas structure in
3C 273, which on mas-scales shows a more pronounced jet than
3C 279.
In the standard model of AGN, the radio emission originates from a
continuous synchrotron self-absorbed relativistic jet and embedded
compact structures, eg. shocks. Determination of the physical
parameters of the innermost and most compact jet component (the jet
base) yields some constraints for current jet models. If we assume
that the observed compact emission results from a homogeneous
synchrotron self-absorbed component with a maximum brightness
temperature of limited by inverse Compton
cooling, and that this component radiates predominantely near
GHz, then a lower limit to the magnetic field
strength is obtained: from we find
, where D is the Doppler boosting factor.
An upper limit for B follows from the observed high Gamma-ray
luminosity of AGN (most of the objects of Table 2 are detected
with EGRET), which indicates that the electron Lorentz-factor
in blazar jets is considerably higher than
previously assumed, eg. (eg. Maraschi et al.
1992). Maximum synchrotron radiation occurs near
. This gives . With an
average redshift and a typical Doppler-factor
for the sources of Table 2, we thus obtain
G.
The size of a homogeneous synchrotron self-absorbed component
observed at 215 GHz is . Single component
Gaussian modelfits to the visibility data of the detected sources
(tab. 1) result in component flux densities of
Jy and sizes in the range of as, corresponding
to brightness temperatures of K. With respect
to the relation above, these sizes must be regarded as upper limits to
the true sizes. Correspondingly the brightness temperatures are
minimal brightness temperatures. The fact, however, that only a
fraction of the total flux is seen in our VLBI observations
( ) indicates the existence of more complex and
more extended emission, which must be partly resolved by the
interferometer beam. For reasonable magnetic field strengths, the
turnover frequency of the extended emission
must be located at GHz (otherwise B gets too
high). It is therefore likely that the brightness distribution of the
objects is not pointlike but consists of several distinct components
with sizes ranging from completely unresolved to largely resolved.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: June 5, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |