 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 323, 295-304 (1997)
6. Conclusions
In this paper we have presented a relation between cosmic density
and velocity fields following a purely Lagrangian derivation (Eq.(22))
that is self-consistent in the second-order model. The advantage of
working in the Lagrangian picture is that the over-density field
obtained from the continuity equation is self-consistent and
automatically satisfies conservation of momentum. For simplicity, one
can adopt the condition (19) of parallelism of the fields
and , satisfied at first
order and by a large class of irrotational solutions in second-order
Lagrangian perturbation theory, and the result (22) holds accurately
at both orders. However, as pointed out in Sect. 3, we note that (19)
is not a sine qua non condition but a weaker condition of parallelism
of the gradients of the fields would yield the same result. It is
shown that this condition is well satisfied for generic initial
conditions. In each case, the function is given
explicitly in Appendix B.1 and Appendix B.2 respectively. Its range of
validity is limited by the epoch when the inversion map
becomes singular, i.e. up to orbit-crossing
time, while its principal range of validity should strictly be
estimated by , where is
the displacement field with respect to the Hubble-flow. This condition
is probably very conservative in view of the success of these
approximations if followed up to shell-crossing.
By specifying the initial data at and
keeping only the leading terms in the solutions, we are able to
recover the leading terms of previous reconstruction models as shown
in Sect. 5. Furthermore, the time dependence of the orbits in our
model is established by solving the Lagrange-Newton system at each
order. This leads to a unique and consistent result for the Eulerian
density constrast in terms of the peculiar-velocities.
We finally wish to show some skepticism about the usefulness of the
reconstruction formulae given. We want them to be applicable to
present day observational data. However, we know confidently that
shell-crossing has occurred, i.e. the interesting regime is no longer
covered. Instead one would have to investigate a relationship between
smoothed cosmic over-density and peculiar-velocity fields,
where the smoothing window scale has to ensure the absence of
vorticity and multi-stream systems in the average flow. Given the
present work we should ask whether there is a formally proper way to
incorporate smoothing into a consistent Lagrangian reconstruction
formalism. With regard to this point, we think that solutions of the
Lagrange-Newton system may possibly provide reasonable tools for
reconstructing average fields, since averages in Eulerian space of any
vector function are straightforward to
calculate: . However, we still encounter the
fundamental problem of averaging over multi-stream flows, which may
not be properly handled in the framework of the Lagrange-Newton
system. Rather, such a description has to be based on an approximation
of the Vlasov-Poisson system. This major improvement of the methods
lies well beyond the scope of present reconstruction techniques and
requires the construction of Vlasov-Poisson type approximations.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: June 5, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |