Astron. Astrophys. 323, 415-428 (1997)
Appendix: fitting formulae
A.1. Electron-electron collisions
The effective collision frequency of
non-relativistic degenerate electrons ( ,
) was analyzed by Lampe (1968) using the
formalism of the dynamic screening of the electron-electron
interaction. The expression of for the
relativistic degenerate electrons at was
obtained by Flowers & Itoh (1976). Here,
is the electron plasma temperature determined by the electron plasma
frequency ,
![[EQUATION]](img236.gif)
. The degeneracy temperature
in the NS envelopes is typically higher than
. Urpin & Yakovlev (1980) extended the
results of Flowers & Itoh (1976) to higher temperatures,
. In the approximation of static electron
screening of the Coulomb interaction, Urpin & Yakovlev (1980)
obtained
![[EQUATION]](img238.gif)
where , ,
and (see Eq. (15)).
Now it is sufficient to calculate the function
, presented by Urpin and Yakovlev (1980) as a
2D integral which depends parametrically on the relativistic parameter
x. Lampe (1968) analyzed this function in the static screening
approximation at . The asymptotes of J
were obtained by Lampe (1968) for at
and , by Flowers &
Itoh (1976) for at any
, and by Urpin & Yakovlev (1980) for
and . Timmes (1992)
calculated numerically in the limit of
. However, the unified expression of
at valid equally for
relativistic and non-relativistic electrons has been absent. Note that
the fit expression of obtained by Timmes
(1992) (his Eq. (10)) is valid only at
.
We have calculated J numerically for a dense grid of
x and y in the intervals and
. The results are fitted by the expression:
![[EQUATION]](img252.gif)
which reproduces also all the asymptotic limits mentioned above.
The mean error of the fits is 3.7%, and the maximum error of 11% takes
place at and .
A.2. Coulomb logarithms
The tables of the Coulomb logarithms calculated from Eqs. (14) and
(15) as described in Sect. 2.3.3 are fitted by
![[EQUATION]](img255.gif)
where and
![[EQUATION]](img257.gif)
For , the fit parameters are given by:
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
For , we obtain ,
, ,
,
, .
If , the rms fit error over all our data set
is about 3.2%, and the maximum error of
7.2% takes place at g
cm-3 and . If
we have 3.7%,
7.8% at g
cm-3 and . For
, we obtain 2.4%,
7.0% at and
. For higher Z, the rms error remains
about 1.5-1.7%, and the maximum error mainly decreases. For instance,
we have 5.1% at and
for ;
3.7% at and
for ; and
3.4% at and
for . This fit accuracy
is quite sufficient for studying the thermal structure of NSs.
A.3. Relation between internal and effective temperatures
In this section, we derive a fitting formula for
as a function of , valid
for , , where
is the surface gravity in units of
cm s-2.
Let us define K,
K, and
![[EQUATION]](img299.gif)
where M is the NS mass and is the
accreted mass. According to GPE, where
is the pressure at the bottom of the accreted
envelope.
For a purely iron (non-accreted) envelope, a very crude estimate
(with an error 30%) yields
![[EQUATION]](img303.gif)
Then is approximately an increase of the
temperature through the iron envelope (in
K). A more accurate fitting formula reads
![[EQUATION]](img306.gif)
The typical fit error of is about 2%, with
maximum 4.2%, over the domain indicated
above.
For a fully accreted envelope, we obtain
![[EQUATION]](img309.gif)
which is valid at not too high temperature (
K).
Finally, for the partially accreted envelopes at any temperatures
within the indicated range, we have
![[EQUATION]](img311.gif)
where
![[EQUATION]](img312.gif)
The typical fit error of Eq. (A9) for is
about 3%, with maximum 5.2%, for all possible values of
and any values of g and
within the indicated range.
The dependence (A7) is recovered not only at sufficiently low
accreted mass ( ), but also at sufficiently high
. The latter result reflects the fact (first
demonstrated by GPE) that at high the thermal
insulation is mostly produced by the conductive opacities in the deep
and hot layers of the envelope, in which light elements (H, He) burn
into heavier ones. On the other hand, even at very low accreted mass
( ), the approximation of fully accreted crust
is good enough at sufficiently low temperature because in this case
the thermal insulation is provided mainly by the low-density accreted
surface layers.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: June 5, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |