 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 324, 155-160 (1997)
1. Introduction
T Tauri stars (TTS) are known to exhibit X-ray emission of
considerable and variable intensity from the pioneering observations
with the Einstein Observatory X-ray mission (see for instance Gahm
1981, Montmerle et al. 1983, Feigelson et al. 1988, Walter et al.
1988, Feigelson & Kriss 1989). With the launch of the ROSAT
satellite, observations with higher sensitivity in both flux and
spatial resolution could be achieved. Investigations of ROSAT surveys
of the Chameleon I, Taurus Auriga and Oph star
forming regions have revealed an increased number of X-ray emitting
young stellar objects (Feigelson et al. 1993, Casanova et al. 1995,
Neuhäuser et al. 1995a and Neuhäuser et al. 1995b). The
origin of the X-ray emission is not fully understood but is usually
interpreted as arising from coronae and/or magnetic flare-like events.
If the magnetic fields of TTS are generated by a dynamo process a
relation between the rotation and X-ray emission would be expected.
From ROSAT data of the Taurus Auriga star forming region,
Neuhäuser et al. (1995a) found a correlation between the stellar
rotational period and the X-ray surface flux. Feigelson et al. (1993)
found no relation between the apparent rotational velocity
( ) and the X-ray luminosity of TTS in the
Chameleon I star forming region. Both authors found, however, strong
relations between the stellar mass, radius, bolometric luminosity and
the X-ray luminosity (see also Krautter et al. 1994).
TTS show pronounced activity in the optical with brightness
variations ranging from less than one hour (flare like) to years.
There are, however, differences in the properties of the optical
flares between the two types of TTS (classified according to their
equivalent width, , of H ;
the weak lined T Tauri stars (WTTS) with Å
and the classical T Tauri stars (CTTS) with
Å) in that the events on the WTTS have shorter rise times and
are hotter than those on the CTTS (Gahm 1990, Gahm et al. 1995). The
infrared (IR) excesses found for the CTTS indicate the presence of
circumstellar disks around these stars. The distinction that CTTS have
disks while WTTS do not is, however, spurious since there are a number
of WTTS with low but with IR-excesses. The
increasing evidence that the CTTS are surrounded by circumstellar
disks strongly indicates that the activity on the CTTS is related to
accretion of material from such disks (see Guenther & Hessman
1993, Gullbring 1994, Gullbring et al. 1996 hereafter Paper I). It is
still controversial whether the X-ray properties of WTTS and CTTS are
similar or not. Feigelson et al. (1993) found no correlation between
the X-ray flux and the strength of the H
emission for different TTS while Neuhäuser et al. (1995a) found
that WTTS have larger X-ray luminosities than CTTS and indications
that the X-ray emission is harder for CTTS than for WTTS.
Simultaneous observations in X-ray and optical of events on TTS can
provide constraints on the underlying mechanisms responsible for the
energy production. In particular, if the flare events are produced in
magnetic loops as is believed to be the case for UV Ceti flare stars,
a correlation between the optical and X-ray brightness variations
should be expected. Only a very limited number of X-ray observations
of TTS have been carried out simultaneously with other wavelength
regions. Recently Feigelson et al. (1994) observed V773 Tauri (a WTTS)
in X-ray (ROSAT), ultraviolet, optical and radio simultaneously during
8 hours. During what could be the decline of a
radio-flare the star was constant in all other observed spectral
regions. Since TTS rarely show fast variability in the optical (less
than 5% of the observed time of these objects;
Gahm 1994), simultaneous measurements should be performed over at
least several nights to put constraints on the relation in the
behaviour between different wavelength regions when the star is
active. There is also only a limited number of patrol observations of
single T Tauri stars solely in X-rays. Such measurements are important
in order to trace the nature of the X-ray variability and to answer
the question of whether the quiescent X-ray emission of T Tauri stars
is due to the superposition of many flare-like events or to a more
steady source like a coronae containing long lived structures. Time
resolved observations have been carried out with the Einstein
Observatory by for instance Feigelson & De Campli (1981) of DG Tau
and SU Aur, Walter & Kuhi (1984) of AS 205 and AA Tau and with
EXOSAT by Tagliaferri et al. (1988) of HD 560B (a Post-T Tauri star
candidate). A recent investigation is the ROSAT observation of the
CTTS LkH 92 that was observed during 23 675
seconds (Preibisch et al. 1993). A huge X-ray flare was recorded, but
no simultaneous observations at other wavelengths were made.
In this article we present five nights of simultaneous optical
UBVRI and ROSAT PSPC monitoring of the CTTS BP Tauri. BP Tauri is
typical for the CTTS class of TTS with IR-excess (Rucinski 1985). The
optical short term variability of BP Tauri was extensively
investigated in Paper I where it was found that the star normally
exhibits smooth brightness changes on time scales of hours.
Occasionally, short term events on time scales 1
hour occurred. EINSTEIN observations of BP Tau showed an X-ray
luminosity of 1.15 1030 erg/s (Walter & Kuhi 1981) and
from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey the luminosity was recorded as 0.7
1030 erg/s (Neuhäuser et al. 1995a). The optical
variability raises the question of a possible short term variation in
X-ray and its relation to the optical activity. The main goal of this
investigation is to determine if the mechanisms behind the optical and
X-ray activity are related or are of different origin.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: May 26, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |