![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 324, 177-184 (1997) Appendix A: precision of LQ-fits to gaussian profilesIn Yoshizawa et al. (1985) we can find the generalized solution of
the precision of a least square fit to a given photonic profile,
taking into account the poisson noise of the distribution. In the case
of a simple gaussian profile of maximum flux
These results translate the fact that the uncertainties scale with the spatial width of the profile, but vary inversely to the square root of the total flux under the profile, i.e. the integrated signal to noise value. Supposing now that an emission line of integrated intensity
If several columns m in the spatial direction are averaged
before the fitting, the total flux to be used is obviously
As an example, let us estimate the different uncertainties of the
least square fit in the case of the long-slit spectrum of AB Aur. The
continuum right- and leftwards of the line peaks at 3560 ADU
(analog/digital units), while the line exceeds the continuum of about
520 ADU. In spectral direction the FWHM of the line is close to
7 pixels (uncorrected for the instrumental resolution), in spatial
direction 4.1 pixels. The CCDs conversion factor is close to 2
electrons/ADU. We average one column of continuum left- and one
rightwards the emission line and then expand the result in the
spectral direction before subtracting it finally from the total
spectrum. For the precisions of the continuum fit equations A1 and A2
apply, with I multiplied by 2 (m = 2 here). The
obtained uncertainties are therefore: Table 5. Theoretical uncertainties on the determination of the FWHM and the centroid of the forbidden emission lines by least square fit to a gaussian profile built by photons. Examples calculated for different stars of the sample following appendix A. Columns: (1) Star and position angle. (2) Maximum signal in ADU of the continuum and the line. (3) FWHM of the continuum in spatial direction and FWHM of the line in spectral direction (uncorrected for resolution, in pixel). (4) Uncertainty on the spatial centroid of the continuum (left) and uncertainty on the spatial centroid of the line with respect to the continuum (quadratic addition of the uncertainties), (right). The spatial centroid uncertainties are translated in angular uncertainties (arcseconds).(5) Uncertainty on the spatial FWHM of the continuum (left) and the line (right), expressed in percentage of the seeing. We see that all these uncertainties are dominated by the measured errors indicated in cols. 3, 6 and 9 of Table 4, most probably due to the unprecise continuum subtraction, the presence of telluric lines, etc.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: May 26, 1998 ![]() |