Astron. Astrophys. 324, 556-565 (1997)
4. Conclusions
We compute the early PMS and MS phases of 0.4 to 5
stars with , 0.02 and 0.04
2. We compare our
models with those provided by DM94 and S94 and we showed important
deviations in PMS tracks for stellar masses below 0.5
, most probably due to differences in the
treatment of electrostatic corrections in cool degenerated matter.
Special attention has been paid to the conversion relations from
theoretical (log L, log ) HRD to observational
(magnitude-color) diagrams. We adopted calibration relations based on
empirical methods. Uncertainties are still large in the O-B and M star
domains.
Comparison between our predicted and observed location of the ZAMS
and TAMS in the versus (B-V) and
versus (V-I) diagrams is very good for masses
above 0.5 . Discrepancy observed below cannot be
fully accounted for by the uncertainties in the color to temperature
conversion relations and could be due to our improper treatment of
electrostatic corrections for such low-mass objects. In the
versus (V-I) diagram, our 108 yr
isochrone is in good qualitative agreement with the low-mass end
distribution of the Pleiades and Per
clusters.
From the versus (B-V) turn-off, we find ages
of for Per cluster and
between and yr for the
Pleiades cluster. These ages are somewhat lower than previous
determinations including overshooting contrary to us.
We generate synthetic HRD diagrams including different IMF, star
formation rates and accounting for binary stars and observational
uncertainties. The synthetic HRD diagrams prove to be a useful tool to
study the morphology of young clusters and constrain the
above-mentioned parameters. We apply this procedure to the Pleiades
cluster. We best reproduce its morphology with an age dispersion of
yr and a fraction of binary systems with
companion mass greater than 0.5 for F-G stars of
40% 5%. We also favor the multiple power law
IMF but we cannot clearly discriminate at this point between different
IMF relations because of possible incompleteness of observational
data.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: May 26, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |