 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 325, 149-158 (1997)
2. Effects of a spiral shock on stellar kinematics
The possibility that the perturbation on the galactic potential
which induces the spiral structure could trigger star formation via a
large scale spiral shock in the interstellar medium was already
studied by Roberts 1969 and Shu et al. 1972; see also the reviews of
Wielen 1974, Rohlfs 1977, Toomre 1977, and Chapter 3 of Bertin &
Lin 1995 for an overview of the process of shock-induced star
formation in spiral arms. The actual existence of such a shock has
been controversial, as it depends on the dominant phase of the
galactic interstellar medium. As noted by Combes & Gerin 1985, a
medium dominated in volume by coronal gas and containing most of the
denser phases in the form of discrete molecular clouds would react
very differently to a spiral perturbation as would do a more
homogeneous medium dominated in volume by warm atomic hydrogen. Also,
Elmegreen 1992 has discussed other ways in which spiral arms can
trigger cloud collapse and star formation without the need for a
spiral shock. However, the existence of a large scale spiral shock has
been assumed in other galaxies in order to explain the azimuthal
separation of tracers of different stages of star formation (see
Bertin & Lin 1995 and references therein), radial trends in the
efficiency of star formation (Roberts, Roberts, & Shu 1975; Cepa
& Beckman 1990; Puerari & Dottori 1996), and color gradients
across the spiral arms (Yuan & Grosbol 1981). In our Galaxy, the
kinematic properties associated to a spiral shock producing a phase
transition in the diffuse interstellar medium have been applied to
explain the overall dynamics of molecular clouds (Bash & Peters
1976; Bash et al. 1977) and the vertex deviation of O and B stars in
the solar neighbourhood (Hilton & Bash 1982). The kinematical
perturbations induced by spiral arms in the solar neighbourhood have
been applied to address problems such as the vertex deviation (Yuan
1971), the local values of the Oort constants (Lin et al. 1978;
Lindblad 1980) and the heating of the galactic disk (Binney &
Lacey 1988).
Our main hypothesis throughout this paper is that the main moving
groups presently observed in the solar neighbourhood were formed in
such shocks, and that the jump in the velocity of the gas crossing the
shocks is the main responsible of their deviation from the circular
motion. As such deviations are observed to be of order
km s-1, i.e., less than 10% of the
circular velocity at the position of the Sun, and the induced radial
excursions are therefore small as compared to the radius of the solar
circle (also less than 10%), we will use the first order epicyclic
approximation to find out the kinematic signature expected in the
stars formed by this process. This enables us to obtain a simple
formulation, which predicts observable correlations among the
constants of the epyciclic orbits, and a criterion of membership in
moving groups based on these correlations. In doing so, we will be
forced to introduce some simplifications, such as neglecting the
streaming motions in the velocity induced by the gravitational
potential associated to the density waves; including these
perturbations would require to link the local spiral-arm structure to
a grand design spiral pattern in our Galaxy. However, such a
connection between the solar neighbourhood and the overall spiral
structure of the Galaxy has been conflictive ever since the density
wave theory was proposed. We will further discuss this point in
Sect. 3.3, and will provide an estimate of the errors introduced
by our simplifications by integrating stellar orbits, including the
effects of the spiral perturbation of the gravitational field.
Let us consider a rotating reference frame whose center,
momentaneously occupied by the Sun, rotates in a circular orbit around
the galactic center with a velocity . The
x axis is directed towards the galactic center and the y
axis points in the sense of galactic rotation. Orbits deviating little
from circularity can be described by the simple epicyclic expressions
(e.g. King 1989)
![[EQUATION]](img6.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img7.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img8.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img9.gif)
where A is the corresponding Oort constant,
is the epicyclic frequency, and
, , C,
are constants describing the size and position
of the orbit and that of the star in it. They can be easily determined
from observations by fixing at the present
time.
The spiral pattern and its associated shock rotate with an angular
velocity . As long as the Sun is far from the
corotation circle, the spiral shock can be pictured as a ridge rapidly
crossing this reference system at periodical intervals, leaving star
formation behind it. The velocity vector of the gas entering the
shock, together with the shock jump conditions, determine the initial
conditions in the motions of the stars.
The spiral shock forms an angle i (the pitch angle of the
spiral pattern) with the direction of the galactic rotation, that we
will assume to be small. As the interstellar gas crosses the shock,
its velocity conserves the component parallel to the shock front,
while, assuming the shock to be strong and rapidly dissipative, the
velocity component perpendicular to it is greatly reduced. The shocked
gas thus moves in a direction nearly tangent to the spiral arm; we
will henceforth assume that this is also the initial velocity of the
stars formed as a consequence of the compression associated to the
passage of the gas by the spiral arm. In doing so, we implicitly
assume that stars are formed out of clouds resulting from a phase
transition in the diffuse interstellar medium or, alternatively, that
the drag exerted by the shocked diffuse medium on pre-existing clouds
can trigger star formation in them and slow them down to the velocity
of the shocked gas in a time which is short as compared to the
epicyclic period. This is also the approximation used by Bash &
Peters 1976. Yuan & Grosbol 1981 have discussed the case of longer
drag timescales, based on the results of Woodward 1976. In that case,
the period over which star formation proceeds in the clouds is shorter
than the timescale for drag of the clouds by the diffuse medium. If
this were so, then the initial velocities of the stars should be of
order of the streaming motions induced by shockless spiral arms (as
they would form before the kinematic effects of the shock could be
transmitted to the star forming clouds), rather than reflecting the
post-shock velocity of the diffuse gas. Given that such streaming
motions have smaller amplitudes than the deviations from circularity
observed in the moving groups discussed here (see Sect. 3.3), we
have chosen the first scenario to proceed in our study.
The circular velocity in the reference frame moving with the spiral
shock is
![[EQUATION]](img15.gif)
where we will use for R (the distance to the galactic
center) and the values of 8.5 kpc and 25.9 km
s-1 kpc-1, respectively, appropriate for the
solar neighbourhood (Kerr & Lynden-Bell 1986). The velocity
deviations of the gas from the circular motion in the galactocentric
direction and in the direction of galactic rotation are respectively
and . The components
tangential and perpendicular to the shock are:
![[EQUATION]](img18.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img19.gif)
For a strong shock to exist, the condition
must be fulfilled, with being the effective
sound speed in the interstellar gas. In a tightly wound spiral, this
condition can be fulfilled far from the corotation circle, where
is large. Moreover, the response of the gas to
the spiral gravitational potential provides a positive contribution to
from the term at the
position of the shock fronts (Shu et al. 1972). On the other hand, the
velocity dispersion in the unshocked gas adds random terms in (3a) and
(3b), expected to be of order of ; therefore,
this condition also ensures that the velocity dispersion of the gas
does not introduce any essential changes in our treatment. Such
velocity dispersion in the gas entering the shock, implying a range of
values in the initial values for the jump conditions, may be expected
to be reflected in the internal velocity dispersion of the moving
groups formed out of it.
After the shock, , . In
the reference frame used to define the epicyclic approximation, where
, , we obtain
![[EQUATION]](img29.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img30.gif)
In writing Eqs. (4) in this form, we are assuming a trailing spiral
and define the pitch angle i to be positive. Under the
conditions of validity of our approximation, the term
in (4a) is much smaller than
, so that
![[EQUATION]](img33.gif)
On the other hand, the term in (4b) is much
smaller than the term in the right hand side of
(4a). By comparison to (4a), Eq. (4b) can then be simply approximated
by
![[EQUATION]](img36.gif)
The Eqs. (4c) and (4d) thus determine the approximate initial
velocity at the time of the passage of the
spiral shock by a given position ,
. If the term is still
larger than , the impulse is mostly in the
radial direction, and the resulting expressions are essentially the
same as if we had assumed a purely circular motion for the gas at the
start. Eqs. (4c) and (4d), together with Eqs. (1), give the following
relations for the epicyclic elements:
![[EQUATION]](img41.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img42.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img43.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img44.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img45.gif)
Let us consider now the evolution of a star forming region along a
spiral shock. Initially, the region is elongated along the spiral arm
and forming with the direction of the galactic rotation an angle
i (the pitch angle of the spiral arm). The shocked region then
moves independently of the spiral pattern, and the galactic
differential rotation tends to align its axis with the direction of
the galactic rotation in a characteristic timescale given by shearing
due to galactic differential rotation, years.
Eventually, this region may approach the solar neighbourhood,
appearing as a ridge of stars perpendicular to the direction of the
galactic center. If the distance from the Sun until which we can
observe these stars is small enough, the fragment of this ridge
accessible to observations will actually correspond to a small portion
of the spiral arm which we can characterize by a single value of
, or, by Eqs. (5d), (5e),
of , .
The solar neighbourhood can be expected to contain some such
fragments of ancient star forming ridges, left behind by the spiral
arm as it moved across the local region of the galactic disk. Each
such fragment will be characterized by the position of the guiding
center of the epicyclic orbits of the stars belonging to it,
, . We can easily relate
, , and
: the position of the spiral shock can be
represented locally by a straight line moving across our reference
system:
![[EQUATION]](img47.gif)
where a is related to the present position of the spiral
arm, and
![[EQUATION]](img48.gif)
Moreover, by Eqs. (5a), (5b),
![[EQUATION]](img49.gif)
and relating , to the
positions of the epicyclic orbits guiding centers by means of (5d),
(5e),
![[EQUATION]](img50.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img51.gif)
whence
![[EQUATION]](img52.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img53.gif)
This expression can be somewhat simplified if the Sun is far from
the corotation and if the observational horizon is restricted to no
more than a few hundred parsecs; in that case, the maximum value of
can be estimated from (1a) and (5c), making
:
![[EQUATION]](img55.gif)
and the ratio of the two terms in the denominator of Eq. (10)
is
![[EQUATION]](img56.gif)
For values of A, typical of a flat
rotation curve and small i, we have that
, and therefore we can write (10) as
![[EQUATION]](img58.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img59.gif)
Developing the products, and retaining only the first-order
terms,
![[EQUATION]](img60.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img61.gif)
We note that, from Eq. (6), , where
is the average age of the group defined as the
time when the star-forming spiral shock passed by the local standard
of rest; therefore, a can be very large for old moving
groups.
We can obtain a relationship among the epicyclic elements of stars
with their origin in the same spiral arm by using Eq. (8). In doing
so, we should include the dependence of with
galactocentric distance; to simplify, we will use that, for a flat
rotation curve,
![[EQUATION]](img64.gif)
where is the value at the position of the
Sun. Replacing (11b) in (8), using the approximation (12), and
neglecting the term containing , which is in
general much smaller than those containing , we
finally obtain
![[EQUATION]](img66.gif)
where
![[EQUATION]](img67.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img68.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img69.gif)
with
![[EQUATION]](img70.gif)
Eq. (13), plus the condition constant, may
thus be used to provide an alternative definition of moving group, by
which member stars are identified by having been formed in the same
passage of a spiral arm by the solar neighbourhood. Notice that this
definition, unlike classical ones, does not imply that the members of
a moving group have isoperiodic orbits around the galactic center,
that their space velocity vectors are similar, or that the stars are
coeval. However, the restriction in heliocentric distance of the
samples of stars whose motions we can analyze implies strong
correlations among their orbital elements, resulting in kinematical
similarities among the stars belonging to a group and observed in the
solar neighbourhood. On the other hand, Eq. (10), together with the
restriction in accessible values of ,
, and correlations among these and other orbital
elements limits the range of ages among the stars belonging to the
so-defined moving groups.
It is in practice convenient to use an alternative form of Eq.
(13), due to the fact that if x is of order of or smaller than
C, then and are
always strongly correlated, regardless of the existence of a
relationship like (13). Eq. (13), however, clearly shows the
dependence of velocity on position implied by our definition of moving
group, taking into account that . Since, by Eqs.
(1c), (1d), essentially determines the direction
of the velocity, our definition implies a gradient in both
and with the x
coordinate, independent of the gradient in V derived from the
condition of isoperiodicity (see e.g. Eggen 1992a), noticeable only
when x becomes of the same order as C. Moreover, Eq.
(13) can have several possible solutions for in
the proximities of for some values of
; it is therefore possible in principle that
stars of the solar neighbourhood having a common origin in the same
spiral arm could appear as kinematically distinct groups. On the other
hand, in some regions of the - x diagram
the gradient of velocity with position can be expected to be difficult
to appreciate, given the scatter arising from uncertainties in the
velocity determinations. High precission spatial velocities extending
to more distant stars (up to a few hundred parsecs) should permit the
detection of this effect and thus provide a justification of our
proposed definition of moving groups on physical grounds.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: May 5, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |