![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 325, 585-600 (1997) 4. The nature of the IRAS counterpartsIn this section, we classify the IRAS counterparts as mass-losing AGB stars that are oxygen rich (O), carbon rich (C), or that are not distinguishable between oxygen stars and carbon stars (OC). We argue that some of the stars may be post-AGB or thermal pulse stars (post/TP). The arguments used in classifying the stars are explained below, and the results are tabulated in Table 4. 4.1. Chemical classification from colours and magnitudes4.1.1. Galactic comparison sampleIn paper II we show how in a K-[12] versus H-K diagram carbon stars are distinguished from oxygen stars. A similar diagram can be made using J-K. In Fig. 5 we present the K-[12] versus J-K diagnostic diagram, for the carbon stars (Fig. 5a) and the oxygen stars (Fig. 5b) from the Galactic sample described in paper II. It is clear that in the Milky Way the K-[12] versus J-K diagram can also be used to separate carbon stars from oxygen stars. The Galactic carbon star sequence (dotted straight line) is described by the empirical relation
The Galactic oxygen star sequence (solid curved line) approximately satisfies an infinite series of the form There is a hint a secondary sequence of oxygen stars, indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 5b. Later we discuss the stars at this side of the principal sequence in the K-[12] versus J-K diagram in more detail. From now, we assume that there be no substantial differences between the K-[12] versus J-K diagrams for mass-losing AGB stars in the Milky Way and in the LMC. 4.1.2. LMC sampleThe K-[12] versus J-K diagram for the stars of the present sample in the direction of the LMC is given in Fig. 6, together with a diagram of the K-band magnitudes versus J-K. The sequences we have drawn in the latter diagram are estimated from the positions of AGB stars and red supergiants in the LMC as compiled by Loup & Groenewegen (1994). LMC red supergiants and foreground stars are predominantly occupying a linear sequence, approximated in Fig. 6a by:
Mass-losing AGB stars in the LMC follow the curved sequence towards red J-K colours, approximated in Fig. 6a: Using the K-[12] versus J-K diagram, we can classify several stars
as being mass-losing AGB stars either on the oxygen star sequence
(solid), or on the carbon star sequence (dotted), with the carbon
stars to be found exclusively amongst the optically thickest sources.
But there are several stars that have too large a
12 µm excess for their J-K colour, or alternatively
are too blue in J-K for their 12 µm excess to be on
the AGB. Of these, LI-LMC1821 is far too bright in the K-band to be an
AGB star in the LMC, and it is probably a foreground star. Another
peculiar source is LI-LMC0530, which lies on the Loup &
Groenewegen (1994) sequence at a blue J-K colour. We will come back to
this source later. The remaining six outliers are all faint in the
K-band, and five of them are redder than J-K Another way of separating AGB carbon stars from AGB oxygen stars is the J-K versus [12]-[25] colour-colour diagram. For this purpose, we have estimated the carbon star and oxygen star sequences from Le Bertre (1993) and Le Sidaner & Le Bertre (1994). The average carbon star sequence may be approximated by: The average oxygen star sequence may be approximated by: The J-K versus [12]-[25] diagram for the stars of our sample is
given in Fig. 7, together with diagrams of the K-[12] colours and the
12 µm magnitudes versus [12]-[25]. For the errors on
the IRAS flux densities we have adopted formal values of 1
4.2. Post-AGB star candidatesIt is interesting to compare the identified NIR counterparts of the IRAS sources as found in the present study, with the sample from van der Veen et al. (1989: VHG-89). The latter sample consists of a compilation of Galactic objects thought to be in the transition from the AGB to the planetary nebula phase. Their distances and absolute magnitudes are not known, so that we can use this sample in the colour-colour diagrams but not in the colour-magnitude diagrams. The J-K, K-[12], and [12]-[25] colours are plotted versus each other in Fig. 8 (circles for the present sample, and dots for the VHG-89 sample). The VHG-89 stars have cool dust envelopes, and have larger 12 µm excesses for their J-K colours than would be reconcilable with mass-losing AGB stars. The six outliers of the present sample roughly overlap with the VHG-89 sample. We classify the six outliers therefore tentatively as post-AGB stars. They would be related to the VHG-89 post-AGB stars with relatively warm dust envelopes, and either have relatively large 12 µm excesses or be optically thick in the K-band. We cannot exclude that one or more of the LMC post-AGB star candidates are actually AGB stars that have recently experienced a thermal pulse (see section Discussion).
4.3. The stellar counterpart of LI-LMC1821The IRAS point source LI-LMC1821 is identified with a bright NIR
star. Our BVRi photometry is presented together with the NIR and IRAS
photometry in Table 3. The B-V and V-i colours indicate a
non-reddened, early-M type spectrum (Iyengar & Parthasarathy
1997). We plot the spectral energy distribution in Fig. 9 (squares),
together with an arbitrarily scaled 3000 K blackbody. We also
plotted mean fluxes of the M0 (open circles) and M5 (solid circles)
giant from Fluks et al. (1994), scaled to a distance of 1.5 kpc.
LI-LMC1821 may be a late-K or early-M giant at a similar distance, and
a member of the Galactic halo or thick disk population (Robin et al.
1996). Alternatively, it may be a very luminous red supergiant in the
LMC, with a bolometric luminosity of
Table 3. BVRiJK-band magnitudes, and IRAS 12 and 25 µm flux densities of the star LI-LMC1821. Table 4. Bolometric magnitudes and object classes of the positive identifications in the LMC: oxygen (O), carbon (C), or inconclusive (CO) mass-losing AGB stars, and post-AGB or Thermal Pulse (post/TP) stars. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: April 28, 1998 ![]() |