Astron. Astrophys. 325, 725-744 (1997)
6. Comparison with other star forming regions
The star forming region surrounding IRAS 20126+4104 is merely one
of a number of high mass star forming regions which have been studied
in detail over the past few years. We compare in this section with the
results for other regions where the formation of O-B stars is
occurring and thus attempt to put the region surrounding
IRAS 20126+4104 in context. It is important to realise in the first
place that in the vast majority of cases, the formation of O-B stars
is accompanied by the formation of a cluster of lower mass stars
detectable in NIR surveys (see e.g. Lada et al. 1991a,
1991b) and that
such NIR clusters are always closely associated with dense molecular
clumps of mass 10-1000 and size
0.1-0.3 pc. Typical masses in the form of young stars are less
but not greatly so than the masses of the dense associated clumps.
Our results for IRAS 20126+4104 are consistent with this general
picture. Lada et al. (1991b) find for example 105 sources with
m (K) 14 mag in the cluster of
effective radius 0.6 pc associated with NGC 2071. In our TIRGO survey,
we find 60 sources with m (K)
16.2 mag in a box 1 pc2. The NGC 2071 infrared
cluster is associated with a molecular clump of radius 0.5 pc and
mass 450 (see Lada et al. 1991b, Walther
et al. 1993). When one considers the difference in distance between
the NGC 2071 and IRAS 20126+4104 clusters, (equivalent to roughly
3 mag), the situation seems comparable. The molecular clump seen
by Lada et al. (1991a) towards NGC 2071 is somewhat more massive and
extended than that observed by us towards IRAS 20126+4104 but this
probably mainly reflects the difference in linear resolutions employed
in the two sets of observations.
NGC 2071 is also similar to IRAS 20126+4104 in that it is
associated with a well collimated outflow (see e.g. Chernin &
Masson 1993, Lada 1985) associated with a mechanical luminosity of
175 and 20
of high velocity gas (as compared to 80
and 100 in IRAS 20126+4104). NGC 2071
however has a bolometric luminosity which is an order of magnitude
lower (750 ) and we conclude that our
estimates for the mass and energetics of the IRAS 20126+4104 outflow
are not exceptionally high. The morphology of the outflow in
IRAS 20126+4104 and, in particular, the switches in orientation on
different size scales are at first sight surprising. We have already
noted that this may partly be due to the effects expected when
observing an outflow of large lobe opening angle close to the plane of
the sky. It should also be noted that many double or multiple outflows
from embedded infrared sources have been recently detected (e.g.
Bachiller et al. 1995, Ladd & Hodapp 1997). This has been
variously interpreted in terms of a "wandering jet" and/or multiple
sources clustered within distances of less than 0.1 pc of one
another. In the case of IRAS 20126+4104 effects of either kind are
likely to be operating and more high angular resolution observations
are needed to decide which is most important.
Finally, IRAS 20126+4104 is also unusual in that it contains a "hot
core" source of mass roughly 10 ,
diameter 0.01 pc, and temperature 200 K. These parameters
are roughly similar to Orion-KL for example (see Walmsley &
Schilke 1993, Wright et al. 1992) where one also detects compact
emission in species such as methyl cyanide on a size scale of roughly
0.03 pc. There is a difference between the two cases however in
that the bolometric luminosity in Orion-KL seems to be an order of
magnitude larger ( ). Given that one expects the
ultimate energy source to be the embedded protostar, it is surprising
that an object ten times less luminous is capable of heating a similar
mass of gas to similar temperatures. Part of the explanation for this
may lie in the uncertain distance to IRAS 20126+4104 mentioned
earlier. If IRAS 20126+4104 is in fact at 4.2 kpc instead of
1.7 kpc, the estimates for the bolometric luminosity and disk
mass rise by a factor of 6 but the inferred temperature is unaffected.
We note however that the water maser source associated with W3(OH)
(see Wink et al. 1994) has also associated compact emission in methyl
cyanide with rather similar properties to IRAS 20126+4104. The
bolometric luminosity in the case of W3(OH)-H2 O is poorly
known but is less than . Thus, the basic
parameters of the IRAS 20126+4104 and W3(OH)-H2 O "hot
core" sources may be similar. There is unfortunately at least one
difference. In the case of W3(OH), the orientation of the peaks from
the CH3 CN channel maps is parallel to the outflow
direction rather than being perpendicular to it as we have found for
IRAS 20126+4104!
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: April 28, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |