![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 325, L13-L16 (1997) 3. Spectral analysis and resultsSpectral fits have been performed with the XSPEC 9.0 package, using the response matrices released on Jan 1997. To cure the mismatch between MECS and PDS absolute normalizations in the current matrices, PDS data have been divided by a factor 0.7, constant over energy (Cusumano et al., in preparation). Note that even allowing for a 10% remaining uncertainty in the cross-calibration, the continuum best fit parameters would change only slightly, and the basic picture would by no means be altered. In the following, all quoted errors correspond to 90% confidence
level for one interesting parameter ( As we are interested here only in the high energy part of the spectrum (i.e. that believed to be due to the reflection of the obscured nucleus), we restricted our analysis to energies greater than 4 keV to avoid contamination from other spectral components. The overall spectrum between 4 and 100 keV is shown in Fig.1. The spectrum confirms that NGC 1068 is substantially Compton-thick, otherwise it would have been detected at a much higher level in hard X-rays, similarly to NGC 4945 (Iwasawa et al. 1993; Done et al. 1996). A prominent, broad iron line is clearly seen. According to ASCA-SIS results (Ueno et al. 1994; Iwasawa et al. 1997), we fitted this broad feature with a blend of three narrow lines, with energies fixed at 6.4 keV (corresponding to neutral iron), 6.7 keV (He-like iron) and 6.97 keV (H-like iron), respectively. The results are presented in Table 1, and have been obtained adopting a power law for the continuum (fitted to MECS data only). No significant differences in the parameters of the lines have been found with a more complex description of the continuum (see below). If the ionized lines energies are instead fixed at 6.61 and 6.86 keV, as suggested by Iwasawa et al. (1997), the results are somewhat different, the H-like line being now more intense than the He-like one. Leaving these energies free, the best fit values are 6.64 and 7.01 respectively (but consistent within the errors with the nominal atomic values). From a statistical point of view, the first and third fits seem to be preferred, but all three results are acceptable at the 90% confidence level. The power law index of the underlying continuum is insensitive to the details of the line modeling. What is important to remark is that the lines' equivalent widths are of the expected order if these lines were produced by reflection of an invisible primary radiation (Matt et al. 1996).
Table 1. Iron lines parameters. The lines have been fitted with If the MECS+PDS continuum is fitted with a simple power law, a good
fit is obtained (see Table 2). (The iron lines have been modeled for
simplicity with a single, broad gaussian feature). However, fitting
the PDS data alone gives a photon index of 1.83
where Table 2. MECS+PDS joint fits with either a simple power law or the two-reflectors model (see text for details). Fluxes are in 10-12 erg cm-2 s-1 and refer to the continuum only. C and W stand for the cold and warm reflector respectively. The power law index of the illuminating radiation has been assumed
to be the same for the two reflection components (so assuming no
angular dependence of the nuclear emission spectral shape). To agree
with the current wisdom on Seyfert 1 X-ray spectra, a reflection
component from the accretion disc should actually have been included
in modeling the nuclear radiation; however, it appears to be an
unnecessary sophistication here. The fit results are shown in Table 2,
and the best fit model in Fig.2. The power law index of the primary
emission (1.74
If the nuclear X-ray luminosity is of the order of 1044
erg s-1, as indicated by several and independent pieces of
evidence (Iwasawa et al. 1997 and references therein), then the 20-100
keV observed flux is about 2 orders of magnitude lower than the
nuclear one. Adopting the Ghisellini et al. (1994) geometry,
both a very high equatorial column density of the torus
( density and the high inclination are consistent with recent water maser measurements (Gallimore et al. 1996; Greenhill et al. 1996). ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: April 28, 1998 ![]() |