Astron. Astrophys. 325, 877-880 (1997)
2. Numerical method
The calculations were carried out with conventional backwards ray
tracing techniques, for details we refer to earlier work (Kayser et
al. 1986 (KRS), Schneider and Weiss 1987, Wambsganss et al. 1990).
Since we are primarily interested in the standard deviation
of the microlensing variation, we found it most
convenient to generate a new star field in the lens plane each time a
magnitude was calculated (i.e. for each loop). We usually calculated
independent magnitudes (1000 loops) for each
case with a given set of parameter values ( ). If
we should have calculated a light curve with 1000 "independent"
points, we would in some cases have had to introduce a star field of
more than stars, a difficult requirement,
imposing heavy demands on the computer memory. Also, the correction
for the not exact independence of the points in a lightcurve is
difficult to estimate.
The size of the star field was in each case kept constant, and for
each loop the stars were randomly distributed in the lens plane. The
number of stars, however, was not constant for the different loops,
but followed a Poisson distribution such that the expected number of
stars gave the "correct" value of . Only then
will the number of stars projected in front of the source be Poisson
distributed in each case (given set of parameter values). With a
constant number of stars the distribution would have been binomial,
since the number of stars is finite.
From standard statistics we find that with
independent values of the magnitude m, it is possible to
estimate with an accuracy (standard deviation)
of
![[EQUATION]](img25.gif)
With our chosen value of we then get
.
Another source of statistical error in the determination of
is caused by the finite number of traced rays,
, which hit the source. With a regular grid of
rays traced through the lens plane ( ), it is
found (KRS) that . It is then easy to show that
this gives rise to a standard deviation in equal
to and that the combined (total) standard
deviation is
![[EQUATION]](img31.gif)
We usually chose such that
. In a few cases for the largest sources
approaches .
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: April 28, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |