![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 325, 933-942 (1997) 3. Numerical simulationsThere are only a few investigations that illustrate several
proposed scenarios of polar ring formation. This lack of theoretical
study devoted to the question of ring origin is connected with the
necessity of the usage of complicated 3D gas dynamics models, since
polar rings contain a high amount of neutral gas (up to a few
The main result of the ring stability investigations is that the time for gas in an axisymmetric or triaxial potential to settle into a steady state is small compared to the age of the Universe (see Christodoulou et al. 1992 and references therein). So there is sufficient time for accreted gas to form polar rings. However, these studies did not take into account time-dependent effects and realistic initial conditions. Some efforts to include these effects have been made by Rix & Katz (1991) and Weil & Hernquist (1993). Rix & Katz (1991) have treated the polar-ring formation process as a gradual smearing of a small gaseous blob captured by a galaxy of spherically-symmetric structure on a distant circular orbit. Naturally, the diameter of the forming ring (up to 80 kpc) was quite completly dictated by the initial position of a gaseous satellite (the orbit radius). The approach of Weil & Hernquist (1993) was more self-consistent. They have considered a parabolic encounter of a low-mass gas-rich companion with a more massive galaxy and consequent merging of the former. The gaseous component of the satellite was settling into the ring after the total disruption of the satellite in the vicinity of the target galaxy. The forming ring turned out rather small (about 6-7 kpc in diameter) and its size was determined in the end by a hand-introduced description of details of the companion disruption. The ability of the accreting material to dissipate energy is the crucial factor for ring formation. Test (noninteracting) particles (which imitate molecular clouds from intergalactic space or clouds belonging to a companion galaxy) lose energy due to ram-pressure in an extended halo of a spiral galaxy and form a gaseous ring rotating around the disk of the spiral (Sofue & Wakamatsu 1993, Sofue 1994). 3.1. Modelling of polar-ring characteristics during the ring-forming processThe main feature of the present investigation is a description of the full history of the gas stripping of the spiral galaxy outskirts and its consequent capture by a satellite during a parabolic encounter. Keeping in mind the recent observations of several interacting pairs of galaxies of comparable luminosities which demonstrate evidently ring-like structures in the making (see Introduction), we have considered a distant encounter of equal-mass systems. In the case of a distant encounter the effect of self-gravity may be ignored. The treatment of the gas hydrodynamics is described below. We did not explore in a comprehensive manner the orbital parameter space and choose only one set of impact parameters for which the modelling encounter of an S0 galaxy with a gas-rich system of comparable mass unambiguously results in the polar-ring formation around the former. Motivated by the above observational data analysis, we have undertaken a numerical investigation of the ring-forming process for galaxies with different structures. 3.1.1. MethodOur simulations are based on a rather standard variant of the SPH
code, which is the same as that in Sotnikova (1996). For simplicity,
we adopt the smoothing length h (analogue of the particle size)
to be independent of the local gas density. The smoothed values of
hydrodynamical parameters are estimated by using a grid with cell
length equal to where P and The motion of where where In the expression (3), the viscosity depends on the divergence of
the velocity field. The first term is analogous to a bulk viscosity,
the second, indroduced to prevent particle interpenetration at high
Mach number, is of the Neumann-Richtmyer type. Parameters
The procedure of a smoothed-value estimation of the gas density is quite usual, as well as the transition from hydrodynamical equations (1) and (2) to SPH-equations (for a detailed description of the adopted numerical scheme, see Sotnikova 1996). 3.1.2. ModelDonor galaxy To minimize the number of free parameters, we chose a very simple model for the donor galaxy - its potential was taken as that of a softened point mass where G is the gravitational constant,
Throughout, we employ the following system of units: the
gravitational constant Accreting galaxy We have considered the two-component model of a galaxy, consisting of a bulge and a disk. The light distribution of the bulge is well-provided by the model used, for example, in Weil & Hernquist (1993). For this model, the potential is where The gravitational potential of the disk component of the galaxy is approximated by a Miyamoto & Nagai (1975) potential where The ratio As shown in Sect. 2, main galaxies of PRGs with extended rings are
similar to spiral galaxies in global photometric structure (and
probably mass distribution). According to de Jong (1996), the bulge
effective surface brightness shows the best correlation with
morphological type of spiral galaxies. Therefore, the total bulge
luminosity (mass) also correlates well. Scaling radii show a large
scatter for all types of spiral galaxies. Thus, we fixed the scale
lengths of galaxy components, leaving only the mass of the bulge to be
variable. Scale lengths of the bulge Orbit Before modelling a ring-forming encounter, we first solved the two-body problem for the donor and ring-host galaxies. The numerical procedure employed is quite similar to that used in Weil & Hernquist (1993). Two interacting galaxies are initially separated by a rather large
distance ( 3.1.3. ResultsDuring the encounter, the primary galaxy strips the outskirts of
the donor object and a ring, rotating in the direction of the orbital
motion, eventually forms around the galaxy in the encounter plane. As
the equatorial plane of the disk component of S0 is taken to be
perpendicular to that of the orbital motion, the ring is polar. The
total amount of accreted gas is about 10% of all gas in the donor
galaxy (or about The simulations have revealed an interesting feature which appears during the ring-forming process in different galaxian potentials. As a steady state sets in, ring sizes begin to diverge. The results for four runs are presented in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2 gives a final stage of polar-ring formation for all considered models. This is the orbital plane projection of the gaseous rings. The marked difference in the ring structure is the difference in ring size, which rises when the bulge mass decreases and ranges from about 7 kpc in diameter for bulge-dominated systems (see Table 1) to approximately 13 kpc for disk-dominated objects. The ring radius is finally determined by the angular momentum of
donor galaxy gaseous particles forming the ring with respect to the
galaxy at the moment of the pericenter passage. As the impact
parameters are nearly the same for all runs, the value of the total
angular momentum of ring-forming particles is almost the same for all
models. But one can see from Fig. 3 that the positions of
particles with the same angular momentum are different for galaxies
with different structures. Particles are closer to the center of
galaxy if there is a more concentrated mass distribution - the
bulge-dominated model. This implies, in particular, that under the
same conditions rings forming around elliptical galaxies with a strong
concentration of mass to the center (see, for instance, the curves
marked as (
In Fig. 4, the surface density profiles along the major axes of the rings are shown. One can see one more interesting feature of simulated rings: rings farther from the center of the galaxy are more extended.
These results give the post factum justification of our impact
parameter choice. Indeed, a closer passage results in less extended
rings. The angular momentum of a gaseous particle at the moment of the
closest approach of galaxies with respect the ring-host system is
significantly affected by the term proportional to
We found in our simulations that, with the same impact parameter, the rings forming around bulge-dominated galaxies are less extended (by factor two) than the rings forming around disk-dominated galaxies. Therefore, having the same accretion history in the samples of elliptical and disk-type galaxies, we will have on average more extended rings around disk-dominated galaxies. This inference may explain in a quite natural manner the absence of extended polar rings around elliptical galaxies. It can also explain a difference in morphology of ionized gas in elliptical and S0 galaxies (Macchetto et al. 1996), assuming external origin of gas in these galaxies. One can remark, however, that the obtained segregation of ring sizes (see Fig. 2) is not as clear as the observed dichotomy (see Table 1). The simple bulge-disk model giving internal rings for bulge-dominated objects fails to explain the existence of very extended (up to 30 kpc in diameter) polar rings around disk-dominated galaxies. Probably, there exists one more physical factor leading to the strong differences of the PRG structural properties. 3.2. Exploration of dark halo inclusion effectAs it was found from the observational data analysis, there exists for PRGs with extended rings a remarkable structural resemblence of host galaxies to late-type spiral galaxies. It is known that dynamical properties of late-type spiral galaxies are determined to a considerable extent by invisible massive halos (e.g., Freeman 1992). Hence, we can suppose that PRGs with extended rings possess a third global component (besides the bulge and the disk) - a dark massive halo. The existence of dark massive halos also follows from the analysis of ring kinematics (e.g., Schweizer et al. 1983, Reshetnikov & Combes 1994a). To account for the rotational velocities in the rings of UGC 7576 and UGC 9796 inside radii of 17 kpc and 21.4 kpc, respectively, one requires amounts of dark mass reaching 1.6 and 3 times the luminous masses (Reshetnikov & Combes 1994a). What are the possible consequences of taking into account this structural component in the context of our investigation? As the gravitating mass of the primary galaxy increases, the orbital velocity of this galaxy relative to the donor object rises also. Then angular momentum arguments for a galaxy with such a structure lead to more distant orbits for captured particles. We changed our bulge-disk model by adding a smoothed third component - a halo. The structure and the shape of dark halos in early-type galaxies appears to be, at present, an open question (Sackett et al. 1994, Combes & Arnaboldi 1996). For lack of unambiguous knowledge about the halo shape, we suppose the halo mass distribution to be spherical. As usual, halos are characterized by isothermal spheres over some radial interval. For simplicity, the folowing phenomenological cumulative mass profile is used to represent a halo in the present study: where Our choice of halo parameters was determined by characteristic
values obtained by Reshetnikov & Combes (1994a) from the ring
kinematics investigation. The core radius The geometry of the encounter was the same as in previous numerical experiments. Expecting the capture of gaseous matter on distant orbits and formation of a more diluted object, we have increased the total number of particles (up to 20 000) as well as their size h up to 375 pc to keep the gas treatment as a continuous medium. The morphology of the new run is shown in Fig. 5.
By the time of The most remarkable feature of this annular structure is its size. The ring material lies well outside the luminous material of the host galaxy. We estimated the diameter of the ring of about 30 kpc. This value is typical of the objects of the first group of PRGs (see Table 1). The annular configuration obtained is rather narrow. Its further long-lived evolution will lead not only to azimuthal smearing of the gas but also to flattening of the radial density profile, forming a disk-like structure. Two factors promote the formation of rings with extended density distributions - the viscosity (see Rix & Katz 1991) and the nonsphericity of the potential (see Fig.5 in this paper and Fig.1 in Katz & Rix 1992). ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: April 28, 1998 ![]() |