![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 325, 1077-1082 (1997) 3. Results and discussionThe hydrogen lines are one of the main source of information about
gravity parameter lg g in the atmosphere of B and A stars. For
the lg g determination both equivalent width and form of the
hydrogen lines profiles were independently employed. The method
applied was as follows. The observed The error of the Table 2. The results of the lg g determination of the programme stars The mentioned method of lg g determination using equivalent
widths gives overestimated values of the gravity parameter, because
the observed equivalent widths of hydrogen lines comprise equivalent
widths of many weak metal lines superposed on the hydrogen lines. For
this reason we employed the form of wings of the hydrogen lines
together with the equivalent widths method to obtain independent
evaluations of lg g. Firstly, we have used the dependence of line
half-width at the intensity level 0.8 on the temperature
Secondly, we have used the dependence of the relative intensity of
the line, at the distance
The lg g values determined using these two additional methods are also listed in Table 2, at the second and third lines for each programme star correspondingly. The mean square root error of the lg g determination, determined using programme and standard stars, equals 0.08 dex. All lg g values obtained using the three mentioned methods are in good agreement. Mean values of lg g for individual stars are given in the last column of Table 2 (the statistical weight of each method employed equals to 1). Standard stars of different luminosity classes were employed to test the validity of the approach used. The lg g values obtained for 4 standard stars (see Table 3) are consistent with that for stars of luminosity classes V and III. Table 3. The results of the lg g determination of the standard stars A comparison of the observed profiles of HD 23194 and the
theoretical ones for
Two more stars - CO Ori and EZ Ori - were added to our observing programme, both being classified as HAeBes (Herbig & Bell 1988) located on the main sequence. Their photosphere temperatures are lower than that for typical ALIVARS and, in addition, CO Ori is considered to be an object of the T Tau group (Herbst et al. 1983). Unfortunately, the method of lg g determination, which have been used, failed to give a proper value of the gravity parameter for temperatures less than 7500 K. However we succeeded to obtain certain values of temperatures of these cool stars using equivalent widths of hydrogen lines. In those cases where the lg g determinations are not possible
we have substituted it by the determination of the luminosity classes.
A well known criterium based on the ratio of the specific absorption
line intensities was used (Seiter 1970). The following pairs of metal
lines were chosen: SrII The criteria used unambiguously point out that the ALIVARS BH Cep, BO Cep and BN Ori are more luminous stars than CO Ori and EZ Ori. For this reason proper values of lg g have been assigned to BH Cep, BO Cep and BN Ori which in our opinion correspond with ratios of the chosen line pairs. These values are labeled in Table 2 with the letter "c". In Fig. 4 the results of the comparison of the observed hydrogen
line profiles with theoretical ones for the variable IP Per are shown
for illustration. Emissions in
Data obtained allow us to state that the ALIVARS studied here are
neither main sequence nor pre-main sequence stars. On the "
This conclusion should not be regarded as a result of the erroneous method applied, because for the standard stars reasonable values of lg g were obtained. It might well be that ALIVARS are evolved rather than young stars, especially those lying far away from star-formation regions. Some ALIVARS on the " We can't help but agree with Filkenzeller's (Finkenzeller 1985)
remark that the locus of HAeBes on the HRD should not be regarded as a
final reference of the evolutionary status of the stars. Values of the
rotation velocities are needed before a definite conclusion can be
drawn. Unfortunately reliable ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: April 28, 1998 ![]() |