Astron. Astrophys. 326, 23-28 (1997)
2. Gravitational potential
Under the assumptions that the gravitational potential fluctuations
are small, parametrized by
, and their peculiar accelerations
are small (thus ensuring that peculiar motions
remain much less than the speed of light) for characteristic
inhomogeneity scales with L the
background curvature or horizon length scale, the following metric
provides a consistent description:
![[EQUATION]](img8.gif)
(Futamase 1989; JLW1). Here a is the FRW expansion factor
(to the order required), the conformal time, and
the spatial part of the conformally stationary
Robertson-Walker metric. The conditions are expected to hold
cosmologically everywhere far outside the radii of black holes and
neutron stars. We call the full time dependence and presence of
in the spatial part of the metric the
post-Newtonian corrections.
The Einstein field equations produce the following relation between
the scalar harmonic modes of and the density
contrast ,
![[EQUATION]](img12.gif)
(JLW1; JLW2). Here k is the trichotomic FRW curvature
parameter, the unperturbed density, and
is the mode variable conjugate to position. No
restrictions are made on the size of , i.e. the
density field could be nonlinear.
Solution of this equation gives (JLW2)
![[EQUATION]](img16.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img17.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img18.gif)
with the Green function in the case (used
here throughout)
![[EQUATION]](img20.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img21.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img22.gif)
Transformation of the time integration variable to
reveals
![[EQUATION]](img24.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img25.gif)
where .
In the Newtonian limit of late times ( ) and
subhorizon scales ( ), and
it is found that
![[EQUATION]](img30.gif)
(JLW2), the usual result. [We have neglected the second, initial
conditions term from (3) due to its exponential die off far from the
initial hypersurface, but see Sect. 3.3.]
Going beyond JLW2 we adopt a dust background
( where is the Hubble
constant) and inhomogeneity behavior to
yield
![[EQUATION]](img34.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img35.gif)
In the Newtonian limit this reduces to . Some
particular cases of interest are (density
unevolving in physical coordinates) and (as for
the growth of linear density fluctuations ):
![[EQUATION]](img40.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img41.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img42.gif)
with erfc the complementary error function.
Since the geodesic equations determining light propagation involve
derivatives of the potential we calculate in comoving coordinates
and .
![[EQUATION]](img45.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img46.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img47.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img48.gif)
with special cases
![[EQUATION]](img49.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img50.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img51.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img52.gif)
The tidal field is , necessary for
calculations involving shear of a light ray bundle and the resulting
image distortions. Because of its length we do not show the expression
for it here but it is interesting to consider the Laplacian
. For
![[EQUATION]](img54.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img55.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img56.gif)
where .
The second term thus illustrates the (not linearized) general
relativistic correction to the Poisson equation (in the fully
specified longitudinal gauge), involving a gaussian weighting over the
extent of the inhomogeneity. In the "Newtonian" limit the fluctuation
is restricted to regions much smaller than the dispersion
so its contrast is averaged to zero, leaving
the Poisson result, while in the opposite ("superhorizon" fluctuation)
limit the gaussian becomes a delta function, giving the Laplace
equation appropriate for a uniform density field.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: April 20, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |