![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 326, 113-129 (1997) 1. Introduction and motivation1.1. On the assumptions of standard galaxy dynamicsThe classical assumption often made in galaxy dynamics (Binney & Tremaine 1987 (BT) chapter 4) is that present day galaxies can be treated as collisionless fluids in steady states described by one particle distribution functions obeying the time independent collisionless Boltzmann equation (CBE). In addition, it is often supposed that these distribution functions are completely characterized by the isolating integrals of motion (of single stars). This implies that almost all orbits are regular and therefore stars
conserve as many integrals of motion (in involution) as the number of
spatial dimensions they move in. Thus, for a three dimensional system
of N stars there are Thus in this picture galaxies are modeled as classical fluids with time independent densities which give rise to potentials similar to those for which the Hamilton-Jacobi equation is separable. Obviously these assumptions cannot be strictly satisfied for real galaxies. It is argued however, that due to the large two body relaxation time (e.g., Saslaw 1985)
(where v is the characteristic speed of a star and n
is the number density of "field stars" of mass m) that these
systems can be treated as effectively collisionless over many Hubble
times. However all that Eq. (1) is saying is that the direct impulse
from encounters between pairs of stars is small relative to the
velocity of a star in the smoothed potential. This is due to the long
range nature of gravitational interactions which ensures that the
whole system contributes to the mean force on a star at all times. In
the approximation leading to (1) however the perturbation to the
trajectory of a test star due to a certain field star is only
calculated at their closest approach - that is only once during a
crossing time. Nevertheless, due to the complicated nature of the
solutions of the Newtonian equations for For general Hamiltonian dynamical systems, regular motions form
invariant (under time propagation of the solution) tori in the
which is considerably shorter than the binary relaxation time. C-systems are very irregular - to the point that their evolution can be described as a Markow process (e.g., Pesin 1989). The collisionless approximation however predicts that spherical systems end up in completely integrable steady states - the most regular and predictable systems that can exist. The contradiction can possibly arise because the analysis leading to (1) focuses on the fact that the force function becomes smoother as N increases. It then assumes directly that this implies the solution becoming more regular not taking into account that exponentially smaller perturbations are sufficient with increasing N to make an N -body system unstable. Therefore, while some quantities that do not depend on the exact details of the dynamics may be slowly evolving and not sensitively dependent on the discreteness noise, the solutions themselves are heavily sensitive to noise. For example, the change in the energies of stars that arises from discreteness noise is likely to be much slower than the changes in their trajectories. A rough example is the fact that numerically integrated orbits in fixed (and smooth) potentials can have the energy (and all the Poincaré invariants) conserved along their trajectories to up to ten digits while the trajectories themselves are completely inaccurate perhaps not resembling (even qualitatively) the real ones (El-Zant 1996b). The numerical errors here represent the noise (if they are taken to be random, a proposition still under discussion: McCauley 1993). This is because here energy is a scalar function of the phase space variables and is related to the force by a path independent integral. That path on the other hand is a 6 component vector in phase space. One can thus easilly envisage perturbations that change the trajectory of a particle without changing its energy. A long time-scale of energy relaxation does not therefore imply that the actual detailed dynamics are collisionless in the sense of being stable solutions of the CBE. One would expect that some macroscopic quantities could be affected, for example velocity dispersion or the actual shape of the gravitational system. In fact, simulations of single particle motions in fixed potentials
show that the time-averaged phase-space density distribution of
individual chaotic trajectories, as well as their statistical
properties, change significantly over a time-scale
Even if the collisionless approximation does hold, this does not guarantee that a given density distribution would not evolve over a Hubble time. This is because individual trajectories, even in a smooth steady-state potential, can have time dependent density distributions over such a time-scale. This would be the case in general non-spherical potentials as noted by Binney (1982). Hasan et al. (1993) describe such behaviour for barred spirals while Merritt & Fridman (1996) show that it may also be important for ellipticals. El-Zant (1996b) examines the case of trajectories started near the symmetry plane of disks embedded in triaxial halos. Finally, it seems that perhaps there is also some observational evidence for evolutionary phenomena occuring in galaxies (Wielen 1977; Pfenniger et al. 1994; Courteau et al. 1996; Pucacco 1992). The above considerations suggest (although in no way prove) that even though gravitational systems obey the CBE in the infinite N limit (e.g., Braun & Hepp 1977) the existence and stability (against discreteness noise) of steady state solutions of that equation are in question when a significant amount of chaos is present. This means that while in some cases the classical theory may still hold over a few Gyr (considering the primitive evolutionary state of cold disks in some spiral galaxies one has to admit that this could often be the case) it does not always obviously do so. 1.2. How chaos drives evolutionA distribution of stars giving rise to an integrable potential can
either oscillate coherently or reach a macroscopic steady state
through phase mixing. This is a trivial form of relaxation which is
simply due to stars moving at different angular frequencies on their
respective KAM tori in the 6-dimensional phase-space - the motion in
the A necessary condition for evolution therefore is the
non-integrability of the system. This condition is satisfied for
N -body gravitational systems since there are no global
integrals of motion other than the classical ones (Poincaré
1889). However, not all non-integrable systems exhibit interesting
behaviour (different from classical theory) in the time-scales of
interest. We need the property of phase-space mixing - that is
the spread of localized volume elements (corresponding to sets of
initial conditions) to cover large areas of the It is therefore important to examine different methods for detecting these processes and the time-scales associated with them in practical situations where the predictions can be tested. The rest of this study is a step in this direction. In the next section we describe why certain subtleties related to N -body gravitational systems require local methods to be used in the quantification of chaotic behaviour. One such approach based on the geometry of the configuration manifold is then described. In Sect. 3 we describe some of the possible applications of this approach while in Sect. 4 results of some numerical experiments testing the method are reported.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: April 20, 1998 ![]() |