 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 326, 528-536 (1997)
4. Discussion
4.1. The nature of the resolved blue stars
The data, as displayed in the CMD of Fig. 2, have been compared
with the isochrones of Bertelli et al. (1994) for the initial chemical
composition [Z = 0.02, Y = 0.28]. The absolute visual magnitude and
effective temperature at different steps along these isochrones have
been transformed in the m175 vs. m
m175 m342 plane, using the synphot
synthetic photometry package and the stellar atmosphere models of
Kurucz (1979). A distance modulus of 27.47 and a foreground extinction
with E(B V) = 0.05 have been
adopted (McMillan et al. 1994). Specifically, the isochrones for the
ages
= 6.6, 7.0, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6 and 7.8 years have
been superposed on the data of Fig. 2. For a more familiar comparison,
typical BOV and B5V stars would have m175 m342 colors of
1.7 and
1.15
respectively (along the
= 6.6 isochrone).
Most of the blue stars detected and plotted in the CMD lie below
the isochrone
= 7.2 and therefore appear as resulting from a
recent star formation episode that, unless the IMF is truncated at
high masses, would have ended
1.5
107 years ago. By comparison with the
masses given along the isochrones, we determine that a truncation at
15 M
would be necessary to mimic the observed CMD
with on-going star formation and this possibility is discarded. There
is, however, a difficulty with the recent star formation
interpretation in the sense that the stars are expected to be more
concentrated on the blue part of the isochrones: for the ages under
consideration, the red part of the isochrones (color
) correspond to stars that are both massive
(typically 13
for
= 7.2) and in a relatively narrow range of
mass; two reasons for a smaller proportion of stars along the red part
than along the blue part of the isochrones. There are several possible
explanations, including an unusual IMF, the effects of dust
extinction, photometric errors and the presence of another type of
blue stars than young stars.
For one, a dust extinction with a color excess
E(B V) = 0.1, as may be possible
given the presence of dust patches, would move a star in the CMD by
0.23 mag to the red (the calculations were made with synphot assuming
a galactic reddening law). Such a shift would increase the photometric
dispersion that we may consider as illustrated by the data at the left
of the main sequence but does not provide a satisfying explanation. We
have explored the possibility of a systematic error which would affect
the photometry in the F342W image. The crowding is more severe and the
background higher in this latter image than in the F175W image. The
trend in the CMD is not found to be changed by visually selecting only
high quality data.
![[FIGURE]](img37.gif) |
Fig. 7. Same as Fig. 2. The solid lines show the P-AGB evolutionary tracks of Vassiliadis & Wood for the core masses 0.900, 0.677, 0.569 M
(from top to bottom). The discontinuity in two of these tracks is due to the use of black body curves in place of stellar atmosphere models at high effective temperatures.
|
A last possibility is that we have resolved Post-Asymptotic Giant
Branch (P-AGB) stars. The P-AGB stars are known to be the most UV
luminous of the various hot and low-mass stars that can be anticipated
in an old population (e.g. Greggio & Renzini 1990, Dorman et al.
1995). The stellar population responsible for the bulk of the visible
light of the bulge is old enough to include P-AGB stars since a number
of planetary nebulae have indeed been identified by McMillan et al.
(1994). We have therefore superposed the recent evolutionary tracks
for P-AGB stars of Vassiliadis & Wood (1994) on the data in Fig.
7. Specifically we have used the H-burning PNN evolutionary models for
core masses of 0.569, 0.677 and 0.900 M and metallicity Z = 0.016. For transporting the
tracks into the m175 vs. m175 m342 plane, we have proceeded as
previously, except that we have used bolometric corrections since we
started from bolometric luminosities, and black-body curves when the
effective temperatures are larger than encompassed by Kurucz's models.
Fig. 7 shows that the blue stars may be P-AGB stars and not young
stars. However, an interpretation exclusively in terms of P-AGB stars
has difficulty in the sense that the distribution and relative
proportion of the stars in the color-magnitude diagram do not match
the time evolution pattern on the P-AGB tracks. First, the stars
appear concentrated on the red part of the evolutionary tracks while
time evolution is slower at high temperature; it has been verified
that the lack of very blue objects does not result from a selection
effect (the F342W frame is deep enough). Second, the time evolution
strongly decreases when the stellar core-mass decreases (i.e. from
upper to lower tracks) and would give a lower proportion of bright
stars. A related argument is that a number of the resolved stars are
too bright to be P-AGB stars.
It is also interesting to attempt a direct comparison with the
number of P-AGB stars detected in an UV image of the bulge of M31
(King et al. 1992). A limit of m175 = 22.5 in NGC 5102 is
equivalent to a magnitude of 19.75 in M31 (adopting
= 24.25 and a color excess
E(B V) = 0.11 for the latter
galaxy). The
30 stars brighter than this latter limit in M31
would imply
10 P-AGB stars in NGC 5102 after accounting for
the respective bolometric luminosity of the two galaxies (i.e. the V
luminosity assuming similar bolometric correction), in the fields of
view observed in the ultraviolet. This number confirms the fact that
most of the resolved stars are not P-AGB stars but it should be kept
in mind that the comparison has many uncertainties since the origin of
the UV flux from old population is not well understood and governed by
metallicity effects.
In conclusion, and although the observed CMD is not fully
understood, the resolved blue stars are most likely young stars and
the last generation of a star formation episode that ended
1.5
107 years ago. It is somewhat ironic
to see that the resolution of stars and the building of a CMD do not
significantly improve the reliability of the interpretation over the
previous arguments based on the integrated light, such as blue color,
color gradient in the center and A-type Balmer absorption-lines in the
spectrum (Faber et al. unpublished quoted by Burstein et al.
1988).
In the context of the favoured interpretation in terms of recently
formed stars, we have examined how the determination of
1.5
107 years as the end of the star
formation episode may be affected by the uncertainties of the
measurements and the parameters used. A metallicity less than the
solar abundance adopted, as suggested from the Mg2 index of
NGC 5102 (Burstein et al. 1988), would change the isochrones by a
quantity smaller than the uncertainty of the determination itself (
0.3
107 years). This same uncertainty is
also found larger than the difference between the two sets of
isochrones (at specifically log t = 7.2) currently used for modeling
of stellar populations (those of Bertelli et al. and those derived
from the evolutionary tracks of Schaller et al. 1992). Last, the
impact of a change of distance modulus (+0.16,
0.25 is the uncertainty quoted
by McMillan et al. 1994) or of a systematic photometric error (about
0.2 mag) are readily seen in Fig. 2: again they stay within the
accuracy of the determination of the end of the star formation
episode.
A rough evaluation of the recent star formation rate is possible by
counting the number of stars between two isochrones. We count 29 stars
brighter than m175 = 22 between the log t = 7.4 and 7.2
isochrones. After a rough correction for completeness in our central
domain, we get a number of
32. According to the distribution of masses
along these isochrones (Bertelli et al. 1994), these stars have masses
larger than
8 M
. According to a Salpeter IMF, 1 M
formed corresponds to 7.4
10-3 star more massive than 8 M
. From our count of 32 stars over a period of
about 9 Myr we therefore derive a star formation rate of
M
yr-1 in the FOC field of view.
4.2. The star formation history
Because of the limit of detection and completeness effects, the
resolved stars and the CMD cannot be used for determining when the
star formation episode began? To address this question we have to rely
on the integrated light, using specifically the IUE spectrum and the
UV V color.
![[FIGURE]](img43.gif) |
Fig. 8. Comparison of the IUE spectrum (thick solid line) (Burstein et al. 1988) with a synthetic spectrum (dashed line) resulting from the combination of an old population of 13 Gyr, an intermediate-age burst of 500 Myr, and a young burst of 30 Myr. Each of these components, listed in order of increasing UV flux at 2000 Å, is displayed as thin line.
|
We have a first qualitative indication that a large fraction of the
star formation is not recent from the blueish m
m175 m342 integrated light in our FOC
images (as discussed above Sect. 3.2) as compared to the color of
resolved stars. It is also clear from evolutionary models (e.g. Fioc
& Rocca-Volmerange 1997), that the star formation episode started
a relatively long time ago. In these models, the combination of a
relatively young burst to a conventional old population would never
reproduce the relatively flat UV spectrum observed with IUE (Burstein
et al. 1988). Unless we have special circumstances in NGC 5102
(extinction law, etc), we need to add the contribution of a spectrum
declining in the UV as produced by an intermediate-age burst (500-1000
Myr). Fig. 8 shows a possible fit of the observed UV spectrum and the
V magnitude in the IUE equivalent aperture with an intermediate-age
burst of 800 Myr, an old population of 13 Gyr, and a young burst of 30
Myr (accounting for the young stars that we resolve). The spectral
evolution models are from Fioc & Rocca-Volmerange (1997). In the
example displayed in Fig. 8 the intermediate-age burst contributes to
60% of the light at 3200 Å but slightly different
contributions and ages (in the range 500-800 Myr) are possible. The
old component does not contribute significantly below 3000
Å indicating that our conclusions do not depend on the
assumptions adopted for the UV spectrum and the star formation history
of the old population.
A model with two instantaneous bursts has been used for simplicity
but the intermediate-age burst has not necessarily ended abruptly and
may naturally be seen as the beginning of a continuous star formation
episode of which we are resolving the last generation of stars. A
continuous formation would have the advantage to reduce the UV excess
produced by the young burst at the shortest UV wavelengths (Fig. 8).
In a continuous formation scenario, the star formation rate would be
declining as a function of time if one wants the first generation of
stars to be able to balance the last generation in terms of UV
emission. A continuous exponentially decaying burst would imply a time
constant of
70 Myr. Our result is close to the conclusion
reached by Bica (1988) that the bulk of the star burst was formed
between the ages 300 to 500 Myr.
4.3. Comparison with NGC 3115
NGC 5102 has been compared with another S0 galaxy, NGC 3115, more
typical of early-type galaxies than NGC 5102 in the sense that it is
gas poor, exhibits a regular UV spectrum and fits well in the
(1550 V) vs. Mg2
absorption-line index relation for elliptical galaxies (Burstein et
al. 1988, Bertola et al. 1993). The UV spectra of these two galaxies
were also compared by Rocca-Volmerange & Guiderdoni (1987). A FOC
exposure of NGC 3115 with the F175W filter and the same exposure time
as the NGC 5102 image does not resolve any star. With a distance
modulus of 30.21 (Elson 1997) and a foreground extinction
AB = 0.10 (Burstein & Heiles 1984), the isochrones and
evolutionary paths for NGC 3115 are basically those of Figs. 2 and 7
translated down by 2.5 mag along the m175 axis (ignoring
the small effect on the color due to the assumption of a lower
extinction). The following results stand out for NGC 3115: (i) stars
earlier than approximately B0V are ruled out. If we assume a
conventional IMF any star formation more recent than
15 Myr is excluded. (ii) the most massive P-AGB
stars are below the detection threshold.
In conclusion, the constraints that UV imaging with the FOC can
place on residual star formation in elliptical-type population are
weak at the distance of most elliptical galaxies.
4.4. Interpretation
The star formation phenomenon in the central region of the S0
galaxy NGC 5102 appears different from what we are used to in regular
sites of star formation, in the sense that the young stars
approximately follow the overall light distribution, do not seem
confined to a disk and are not significantly clumped into clusters.
These features as well as the existence of an UV gradient close to the
center are naturally explained by the role of the galaxy potential
well. Interestingly, the high angular resolution of the HST shows
that, in contrast to the conclusion from ground-based observations
(Pritchet 1979), the nucleus does not contribute to the UV gradient
confirming that we have a purely stellar population phenomenon. The
star formation also provides a natural explanation, at the expected
location in the bulge, for the ring of ionized gas discovered by
McMillan et al. (1994). According to the models of Leitherer &
Heckman (1995), the total kinematic energy of
1052 ergs that McMillan et al. have
calculated for the supershell would be produced over a time scale of
15 Myr by the last 2 Myr of the current star formation rate of
M yr-1 (except for an IMF poor in
massive stars).
Pritchet (1979), van Woerden et al. (1993) have searched for
external factors that may have been able to supply gas and/or to
trigger star formation in NGC 5102; they found no evidence for any
possible encounter with another galaxy within the last few
109 years. With the mounting evidence for a multiplicity of
star formation history in early-type galaxies (Bressan et al. 1996)
and especially the S0 galaxies (Fisher et al. 1996), the need for an
external cause is less compelling. NGC 5102 would then only appear as
an extreme example of a current phenomenon with perhaps the youth of
the burst and the rather short distance favouring the detection of the
residual star formation. This is also consistent with the fact that
the star formation takes place in the center where the gas is expected
to concentrate. The central depression in the HI
distribution would be the witness of the star burst started 500-800
Myr ago that would have stopped because of gas exhaustion. The
HI surface density of 0.9 M pc-2 (van Woerden et al. 1993) is
indeed at the lowest extremity of the range of threshold values
reported by Kennicutt (1989). The very central peak of
HI may indicate a new replenishment of gas since the
end of the burst. This is highly speculative since the origin of the
gas itself (not to mention the time scale of the processes involved)
is not understood. In addition, even if the gas shed by stellar
evolution is a possibility that could be invoked for the origin of the
gas, it is not clear why the gas should be removed and/or the star
formation inhibited in a number of early-type galaxies. In this
context it is interesting to note the evidence of multiple episodes of
star formation in local group dwarf ellipticals (Ferguson &
Binggeli 1994) and the larger fraction of color gradient (bluer toward
the center) among early-type dwarf galaxies (Vader et al. 1988,
Chaboyer 1994) indicating a possible increase of the occurrence of
relatively recent star formation in galaxies of low-luminosity.
Although not a dwarf galaxy itself, NGC 5102 has a low luminosity (M ).
Finally our observations illustrate the general difficulty of
understanding the nature of the stars responsible for the ultraviolet
flux of elliptical galaxies, and, more specifically, of how any
residual star formation may be distinguished from extreme horizontal
branch stars and their evolutionary progeny. The comparison with NGC
3115 shows that only the most massive stars (implying only very recent
bursts or on-going star formation) can be resolved by the HST provided
the ellipticals are not too distant. Even though blue stars are
resolved, it may be difficult to determine individually the nature of
these stars with UV photometry alone as shown by the example of NGC
5102. It is worth noting that other features or parameters such as
blue color gradient or integrated
UV visible color are not free of
ambiguities as indicators of star formation: globular clusters also
have central UV color gradient (Djorgovski & Piotto 1992) and NGC
5102, although distinct from elliptical galaxies in the
(15 V) vs. Mg2 plane
(Dorman et al. 1995), is at the location of the globular clusters in
this plane.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: October 15, 1997
helpdesk.link@springer.de |