![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 326, 907-914 (1997) 3. The neighborhood of the Polar Ring GalaxiesIn the first approach the extension of the search area for each
field has been established to be 5 times the diameter of the central
object, according to the previous studies on the environment of
peculiar galaxies (Theys & Spiegel 1976 , Few & Madore 1986 ).
Such a portion of sky should be large enough to include objects able
to perturb, or to have recently perturbed, the PR host galaxy. In our
sample, the fields have extensions of 20 The normal galaxies fields, used as a control sample, were selected
using the following criteria: 3.1. Data productionThe study of the environments of these fields was based on the counts of the objects present and on the statistical analysis of their properties, such as the projected distance r from the PR and the apparent diameter D. The positions and diameters within a fixed isophote were then extracted from the APM Sky Catalogue, available on-line from the Observatory of Edinburgh. A total of 29 fields, mainly in the northern sky, were obtained. The data concerning two fields selected as good examples of polar ring galaxies, ESO603-G21 and ESO503-G17, were not available. All the remaining PR fields were analyzed from our PDS scans using the FOCAS (Faint Object Classification and Analysis System) procedures operating in the IRAF software package. APM archive (Irwing et al. 1994 ) furnishes data extracted from
both R and B plates of Palomar Sky Survey. It lists all
the objects present in the plates over the brightness level of 24
mag/arcsec2 for the blue plates and 23
mag/arcsec2 for the red plates. Their corresponding B and R
limiting magnitudes have been respectively estimated to be 21.5 and
20.0. The measured parameters are: the A different approach was needed with scans analyzed using FOCAS. The Point Spread Function (PSF) had to be measured for each field, using several isolated and relatively bright stars. After that, a set of rules was defined to classify the different kinds of object in a similar way as the APM. After many attempts, we established that the objects whose FWHM was between 0.6 and 1.2 times the PSF can be considered stars; those ones between 1.21 and 10 times the PSF were classified galaxies; while detections with smaller and larger FWHM were considered small- and large- scale noise respectively. Here also, three galaxies were too large for being recognized by the software as single objects, and were fragmented into several spurious identifications. They are NGC 2865, NGC 4672 and IC 3370. The corresponding fields were all discarded and the sample reduced to 24 fields. We used the radial moments xx, yy and xy, furnished by FOCAS, to calculate the diameters D in arcsec, through the formula We also computed the radial distance r of each galaxy from the central galaxy (PR or NG). The final set of data includes a total of 48 PRFs (24 from APM and 24 from PDS+FOCAS). Including the control sample, the total number of examined fields is 96. 3.2. Magnitude calibration for PR galaxiesIn the PRC, a lot of PRs lack B magnitude. In the automatic surveys catalogues, such as APM or similar ones, the peculiar cross-shaped structure of the PR often induces a false classification as "star", generating unbelievably high magnitude values (from 8 to 10, in some cases). On the contrary, the magnitudes extracted using the FOCAS package on many galaxies of our sample were more accurate. To produce new magnitude data from the scanned images, we first fixed the zero-point level to an arbitrary sky value and then we compared the so obtained magnitudes with those of PR galaxies whose total magnitudes were already known. This comparison indicated a zero-point shift of 0.71 magnitudes. When this correction was applied to the data, the difference with the total magnitudes of the catalogues such as RC3 (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991 ) or LEDA 2 became lower than half a magnitude (Figure 1). The new determined magnitudes for PRs lacking this value in the literature are listed in Table 1.
3.3. Statistical testsAccording to similar studies (Heckman et al. 1985, Fuentes-Williams & Stocke 1988) we defined for each field the following density parameters: where (i,j) could assume the values 0, 1, (2,2) and (3,2.4). From
the above formula, The diameters and the distances from the center of the fields were
both converted in units of the central galaxy diameter and the
resulting set of parameters is listed in Table 2. As said in the
previous sections, only the diffuse objects lying at 5 diameters from
the center were selected, discarding those ones outside this limit. To
remove the contribution of the background galaxies, all the objects
with diameters smaller than 1/5 of the polar ring size were excluded.
Considering the real size of the galaxies with known redshift, this
cut-off limit only excludes surrounding objects with size
For those polar rings whose distance is known, and for the
corresponding control sample, a set of similar parameters has been
built on a scale unit of 100 kpc and the maximum limit of the search
area has been fixed at 100 kpc from the center of the fields. The unit
and the limit assumed are similar to those used for the previous
investigations (Heckman et al. 1985) and define a research
area which is, in most cases, similar to that of the used fields (20
Finally, after defining the
Table 3. Summary of Kolgomorov-Smirnov tests. D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: April 8, 1998 ![]() |