![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 326, 1069-1075 (1997) 4. ResultsThe results are detailed in Tables 5, 6 and 7 (available in electronic format from CDS), where the solar abundances, except for Fe, come from Anders and Grevesse (1989). The Fe abundance is derived from Johansson et al. (1994). These are shown graphically in Figs. 3, 4 and 5, which show the relative abundances of the RV Tau variables and their red-giant companions, where: The filled circles denote elements for which there are at least two
spectral lines measured from each star. The open circles, without
error bars, are for those elements with only one spectral line in one
or both of the stars. For comparison purposes, differential abundances
are also displayed with the metal poor star BD+11
The errors in the figures illustrate only the line to line
variations. Errors due to uncertainties in the physical parameters are
of the order of
Table 4. Modelling errors from uncertainties in physical paremters 4.1. M2The RV Tau variable M2_V11 is particularly enhanced in abundances
of the odd-elements Na and Al, relative to the red giant M2_HII_89, as
well as in the the
Since the Fe abundance is within 0.2dex of the red giant's, and Sc
is of perfectly normal abundance, it seems that neither contention of
Luck and Bond (1989) are supported. Comparison with the control star
BD+11
One possible alternative view is that RV Tau variables are post-AGB stars showing evidence for deposition on to grains, as was found for IW Car by Giridhar et al. (1994). Key abundance changes expected in this case would be a reduction in [Fe/H] by 1.0dex, a reduction in [Sc/H] and [Ca/H] by 2.0dex, and a slight enhancement in [Zn/H] by 0.2dex. None of these were found. 4.2. M13The RV Tau variable M13_SH_11 shows much less scatter about the normal Fe abundance, relative to the red giant M13_I_13, than for M2_V11. There are four elements with obvious overabundances in M13_SH_11, the odd elements Na and Al (as for M2_V11), and Ba. The fact that Ba is again significantly high is interesting. Unfortunately, the abundances of Ba are derived from strong to very strong lines, and as such, are not dependable. At the very least, there is no evidence for any s-process element underabundance. Nor is there any underabundance observed for Sc. Since the Fe abundance is within 0.05dex of the M13_I_13 Fe abundance, again there is no support for either contention of Luck and Bond (1989), nor is there any s-process underabundance. In addition, there is no sign of deposition onto dust grains. When comparisons are made with the control star BD+11
4.3. M56The most puzzling star of the sample studied, was the RV Tau
variable star M56_V6. Most lines of Fe were in agreement with a
massive 1.7dex underabundance relative to the two red giants studied
from M56. Excellent agreement was observed with this value and the Cr,
Mn, and Ni abundances. However, four lines of Fe, and several other
element abundances, including Sc, Ti and all the s-process elements,
are vastly enhanced in abundance relative to the derived Fe abundance,
and close to the abundances in the red giant companions (within
The five Fe lines in question are those at 4930A; 5060A; 5247A;
5250A; and 5373A. The line at 4930A is particularly strong, indicating
an abundance of 6.12, but the other four lines are closely grouped,
with an average abundance of 5.41
Is it possible that we are witnessing here the effects of grain deposition? The elements Fe, Cr and Ni are depleted equally, and are consistent with grain deposition. The critical element in this case, however, is Ti. According to Federman et al. (1993), Ti should be as depleted as Fe, or more so. The evidence remains, that Ti is much less depleted than Fe in M56_V6. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: April 8, 1998 ![]() |