![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 327, 966-982 (1997) 4. Discussion4.1. Main observational resultsAs shown in the previous section, our main observational results are the following:
4.2. Projection effectsIn interpreting the observed surface brightness distributions as surface density representations, we should be cautious: different stellar populations may have both different mass-to-light ratios and different velocity dispersions. Moreover, the observed galaxy surface brightness distributions are line-of-sight integrations of the light contributions and therefore include contributions from very different locations in the disk. However, as noted by, e.g., Dove & Thronson (1993), these effects are normally considered to be small. Kylafis & Bahcall (1987) showed that the main effects of scattering are the reduction of the extinction in the dust lane due to forward scattering and an apparent thickening of the central layer of high luminosity. This would not lead to a more sharply peaked profile if the underlying light (or density) distribution were isothermal. Moreover, scattering is not expected to be important in the near-infrared for edge-on galaxies (Kuchinski & Terndrup 1996). Since the differences between the models discussed here are small,
we have investigated the effects of projection. Projection effects
lead to an apparent thickening of the high-luminosity midplane of the
galaxy. Deviations from an inclination of 90
The effect on the 2/n values of deviations from a
4.3. Disk heatingIn this paper we show that the universal vertical structure that is observed away from the galaxy planes is maintained even when going all the way down to very low z distances. Models that aim to explain this observational fact should also be able to account for intrinsically exponential vertical surface brightness or density distributions. As Dove & Thronson (1993) warn, if the vertical distribution of stars cannot be fit well by the isothermal sheet approximation, which model is based on physical principles, then rather than invoking an arbitrary alternative function, a more physical function should be that of a nonisothermal stellar distribution. A nonisothermal distribution of stars can be represented by a linear combination of isothermal components (Oort 1932). It is possible that once a coeval population of stars has been formed, they do not (or only over a long period of time) interact with other components and are therefore quasi-independent isothermal components (Dove & Thronson 1993). Such a model would be physically realistic, since if stars have formed at different times with different velocity dispersions and have not yet reached an equilibrium state, or if the stars are dynamically heated during their evolution, the resulting distribution of stars would not be well approximated by a single isothermal model. From observational evidence we know that stellar subpopulations of different ages have different velocity dispersions. Star formation is generally believed to be a continuous process. Therefore, a more accurate model for a galaxy disk is a superposition of a very large number of components, or, as Kuijken (1991) proposed, an integral representation. The observations presented in this paper indicate that the physical process responsible for the vertical luminosity profiles is probably both global and universal in nature, since we do not find any significant radial variations of the cuspiness of the profiles, nor large variations as a function of galaxy type. This puts interesting constraints on the dominant vertical heating mechanism in galaxy disks. Although the dominant perturbations in a disk are the spiral waves,
they have a close relationship with the giant molecular clouds (GMCs).
Julian & Toomre (1966) and Julian (1967) suggested that the GMCs
must acquire large wakes of material, thus increasing the effective
mass of the combined spiral and GMC perturbation. These wakes can be
very strong, but will also spread over a large area of the disk, which
makes it more difficult to assess the importance of such wakes in
enhancing the scattering efficiency. Moreover, at present there is no
satisfactory explanation as to how disk heating, the rate of which
must vary greatly with radius from the observed distribution of GMCs
in our own and other galaxies, can naturally lead to a global and
universal vertical density distribution and a constant scale height
with galactocentric distance (i.e.,
4.4. Isothermal versus exponential distributionsJenkins (1992) finds, that his model disk heating process, i.e., combined spiral and GMC perturbations enhanced by disk accretion, together with constant star formation, always leads to a closely isothermal stellar population. Wielen (1977) reached a similar conclusion based on observational data. Burkert & Yoshii (1996) show, based on realistic hydrodynamical calculations of disk evolution processes, that - if one starts from a non-equilibrium gaseous state - the final vertical stellar density profile depends strongly on the initial distribution of the protodisk gas, as opposed to the GMC heating process described in the previous section. On the other hand, if they assume that the gas settles into
isothermal equilibrium prior to star formation and gas cooling, then
always an exponential density profile is formed, although the vertical
scale height increases as a function of decreasing surface brightness.
In fact, in de Grijs & Peletier (1997) we presented the results of
a detailed study of the vertical scale height distributions in the
present sample, for which we found an increasing scale height with
galactocentric distance, in particular for the earlier-type galaxies.
An interesting result from the calculations of Burkert & Yoshii
(1996) is that when the ratio of the star formation time scale to the
cooling time scale lies in the range between
Therefore, the process of crucial importance is that the SFR is adjusted sooner or later to balance with the local cooling rate (Burkert & Yoshii 1996). Just et al. (1996) find that if the SFR decreases with time, exponential luminosity profiles also grow naturally. They state that since the mass-to-light ratio of a stellar population increases with age, an exponential luminosity profile corresponds to a density profile that is slightly flattened to the galaxy plane. However, an isothermal density distribution is too thick to explain exponential light profiles. For a constant SFR an obvious luminosity excess near the plane would show up in the optical bands, when assuming a heating mechanism of the type observed in the solar neighbourhood. The fact that we observe a more strongly peaked vertical light
distribution than a sech(z) model in all our sample galaxies,
independent of galaxy type, indicates that the process at work here is
a process intrinsic to the disks themselves, rather than a
type-dependent mechanism. The variations in the cuspiness of our
profiles along the galaxies' major axes are probably due to some local
mechanism, e.g. the contamination by residual dust. Although we
observe a similar behaviour in S0s as in later-type galaxies, this
does not necessarily mean that they all possess young populations,
although the young population contributes also in the near-infrared.
The dominant stellar population in
Finally, the fact that we observe a lack of "rounder" profiles in the smaller galaxies compared with the larger ones, may indicate that we are hindered by an underlying dust component, which is concentrated towards the galaxy planes, and more extended in the larger galaxies than in the smaller ones, at least to an outside observer. It may be that in the smaller galaxies this dust component affects relatively fewer data points than in the larger ones, thus causing a bias towards more sharply peaked vertical profiles. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: April 6, 1998 ![]() |