 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 327, 1123-1136 (1997)
2. Observations, data reduction and first results
The observations were conducted at the ESO 3.6 meter telescope in
Chile (La Silla) during November 1994 using the ESO mid-infrared
camera TIMMI (Thermal Multi Mode Instrument) built by SAp (Service
d'Astrophysique, CE Saclay) (Lagage et al. 1993).
Pictoris was observed during three nights with
the smallest pixel scale of TIMMI, 0.33 arcsec, and with the 10.5-13.3µm
band-pass filter. In order to benefit from the
full pixel resolution, we have aligned the disk orientation with one
of the axis of the detector, by rotating the telescope adaptor. The
usual chopping and nodding techniques were used; the chopping and
nodding frequencies were respectively 6 and 0.01 Hz. To avoid the
saturation of the detector by the huge ambiant photon background, the
image elementary integration time was set at 7.7 ms. The elementary
images were coadded in real time during 20 chopping cycles. A total
time of 300 min was spent on the source, which was always observed
below 1.3 airmasses. The peak signal to noise ratioprior to any
filtering is around 200. The nights were photometric; the number of
counts recorded by the detectors varyied by less than 1 percent from
night to night. The nearby reference star
Car was frequently monitored. The photometry is
in full agreement with previous measurements (1.1 Jy at 11.9µm
for the disk plus star in a 4 arcsec beamin
diameter). The images were flat fielded by using sky images with a
sligtly different integration time. The array is quite homogeneous and
the flat field corrections are always below 20 percent. The reference
star
Car is also used to remove the stellar
contribution to the observed flux, as in LP94.
At 12µm, images are strongly degraded by diffraction,
seeing and noise. To get the best angular resolution possible, we had
to deconvolve (restore) the images. The Point Spread Function (PSF)
was derived from observations of the reference star ( Car). There are various methods to restore
images. We have selected the new Multi-Scale Maximum Entropy Method
developed by Pantin and Starck, 1996, because it proved to be sligthly
better in general than the other ones. In the case of the
deconvolution of the
Pictori s dust disk at 12µm,
the method does not really bring determinant
improvements and similar results were obtained with standard
deconvolution methods, like the regularized Richardson-Lucy algorithm
with noise suppression using a multiresolution support (Richardson,
1972, Lucy, 1974, Murtagh et al., 1994; Starck et al., 1994) or the
popular Maximum Entropy restoration (Gull et Skilling, 1984). The
deconvolved image obtained here has a resolution of about 0.33 arcsec
(from deconvolution experiments of two PSFs) and is in agreement with
the one shown in LP94. The error bars have been derived from the error
estimated on the PSF ( 5 %) and the subsequent error on the stellar
subtraction. Nevertheless, one should note that the resulting error in
the central part of the disk (and also the later derived dust density)
does not exceed 40 %. Note also that the profiles derived by LP94 and
the new one are very close, when the error bars are taken into account
(see Fig. 2).
![[FIGURE]](img9.gif) |
Fig. 2. Flux profiles obtained with the new data compared with those of LP94 (diamonds).
|
The asymmetry S-W/N-E detected in LP94 is confirmed (Fig. 3), even
if the new values are in the lower range of the uncertainties of the
previous measurements (Pantin et al., 1995). One should note that the
asymmetry is already seen in the "raw" images before deconvolution,
but the very conservative errors we took concerning the deconvolution
process lead to large error bars in Fig. 3. This may lead one to think
that the asymmetry is only marginal, but this is not the case.
![[FIGURE]](img11.gif) |
Fig. 3. S-W/N-E asymmetries as a function of the distance to the star
|
As the observations of November 94 are better than the earlier one
in terms of angular resolution and signal to noise ratio, the disk is
resolved in thickness (Fig. 4).
![[FIGURE]](img14.gif) |
Fig. 4. The equivalent width (in AU) of the disk as a function of the distance x to the star (in AU). The thickness is defined as w(x)=
, where z is the direction perpendicular to the disk plane.
|
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: April 6, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |