SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 327, 1262-1270 (1997)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

3. Photo-ionizing radiation flash as trigger of efficient [FORMULA] cooling in free metal gas clouds

In the context of formation of galaxies and globular clusters, the non-equilibrium formation of [FORMULA] has been identified as a key process for achieving a rapid cooling bellow [FORMULA] (Palla & Stahler 1983; Izotov & Kolesnik 1984; Shapiro & Kang 1987; Palla & Zinnecker 1987; Kang et al. 1990; Anninos et al. 1996; Padoan et al. 1996; Tegmark et al. 1996). On the other hand, the ionization and dissociation of primordial gas by UV background radiation have been taken into account as an important parameter in many studies of the thermo-chemical evolution of pregalactic and intergalactic structures (Kang et al. 1990; Donahue & Shull 1991; Ferrara & Giallongo 1996; Haardt & Madau 1996; Navarro & Steinmetz 1996; Mucket & Kates 1997). In general, the UV background radiation acts as an inhibitor of [FORMULA] formation. However, there are exceptions to this rule. Recently Haiman et al. (1996) have shown that UV background radiation can enhance the formation of [FORMULA] in primordial gas at high densities ([FORMULA]) and low temperatures ([FORMULA]); but for densities lower than the above value, the effect of a constant UV background radiation is to inhibit the [FORMULA] formation. As it will be shown in the present section, rapid variations of the UV background radiation can also enhance the non-equilibrium formation of [FORMULA]. In particular, we focus our attention on flash like variations capable of heating and increasing the ionization fraction of an initially warm-neutral gas cloud near thermo-chemical equilibrium. After the passing of the radiation pulse, the enhanced ion fraction makes the gas phase formation of [FORMULA] molecules possible by the creation of the intermediaries [FORMULA] and [FORMULA]. The presence of small quantities of [FORMULA] molecules then makes possible further radiative cooling to temperatures as low as [FORMULA]. The rapid cooling ([FORMULA] free-fall times) abruptly reduces the Jeans mass by a factor [FORMULA], permitting the fragmentation of clouds initially marginally stable. Izotov (1989) has considered the homogeneous contraction approach of a gravitational unstable cloud, but here we are interested in delimiting the necessary conditions that provoke the rapid cooling of the cloud without invoking the gravitational collapse. UV radiation pulses have similar effects than shock waves because the post-shock flow also recombines out of equilibrium.

The spectrum, amplitude and duration of the radiation pulse are free parameters in our model. However, it should be noticed that, in order to induce efficient [FORMULA] cooling in the cloud, the detailed form of the flash is not important as long as that, during the flash, the ionization of the cloud increases appreciably and after this, the ionizing flux decreases to background values in a short time compared to the recombination time.

The initial conditions of the cloud and the characteristics of the hypothetic ionizing pulse depend on the chosen scenery. For example in the Fall and Rees (1985) scenery, during the proto-galactic collapse, if the gas is assumed to be lumpy, the overdense regions will cool more rapidly than the underdense regions producing a two-phase medium. But the developing rate of this overdense regions depends on the initial conditions (i.e. the denser regions develop faster; Murray and Lin 1990) and on their interaction with the system. Thus, a dependence of the density contrast and of the mean cloud masses on the galactocentric distance are expected. The assumption of an ionizing flash produced in the galactic nucleus implicitly assumes a radial increment of the delay in the evolution of the clouds relative to the center. The dilution and attenuation of the ionizing and dissociating radiation produced in the flash also introduce a radial dependence. In fact, the possibility that proto-galactic structures are exposed to UV radiation emitted by massive young stars or an active galactic nucleus has been considered previously (Kang et al. 1990). Therefore, it would be useful to know the dependence of the cloud evolution on the flash characteristics, and on the cloud initial state (i.e cloud mass ([FORMULA]), temperature (T), number density (n), and the relative number density of the species ([FORMULA]).

To follow the thermal and chemical evolution of a metal-free cloud in presence of a variable radiation flux, we consider an idealized uniform cloud. The gas model adopted for this application considers the following 9 species: H, [FORMULA], e, [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], and [FORMULA]. Assuming a mass fraction y ([FORMULA]) of Helium relative to Hydrogen, then [FORMULA], where [FORMULA] is the ratio of the number density of species i to the total number density of Hydrogen nuclei n. The processes of formation and destruction of these nine species are assumed to be the 24 reactions in Table 1 of Rosenzweig et al. 1994. The adopted cooling rates, include: 1) the collisional ionization of H by electron impact; 2) the free-free transitions of [FORMULA] (Izotov (1989) and references therein); 3) the collisional ionization by electron impact of [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] ; 4) the free-free transitions of [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] ; 5) the total dielectronic cooling rate of [FORMULA] (Shapiro & Kang 1987); 6) the [FORMULA] cooling rates due to rotational and vibrational transitions excited by ([FORMULA]) and ([FORMULA]) collisions, calculated according to Lepp and Shull (1983). These [FORMULA] cooling rates must be multiplied by a factor [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] to take into account the escape probability of the vibrational and rotational photons, respectively. Finally, 7) the excitation of the [FORMULA] vibrational levels ([FORMULA]) by low energy electron-impact was taken into account (Klonover & Kaldor, 1979).

The external radiation flux affects the photoionization of the Hydrogen and Helium, and the [FORMULA] photo-dissociation (and its associated heating rates; see Rosenzweig et al. 1994). The external photon flux is assumed to have the quasar-like distribution (Shapiro and Kang 1987)

[EQUATION]

where [FORMULA] is the H Lyman-edge frequency. The function [FORMULA] is introduced to represent the changes of the flux level outside the cloud, and is assumed to behave as [FORMULA] in the Lyman continuum, and as [FORMULA] for the photo-dissociating photons. Since a homogeneous cloud is assumed in this application, the optical depth at its center, for the ionizing radiation, can be written as:

[EQUATION]

where M is the mass of the cloud in units of [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] are the absorption cross sections of species i at frequency [FORMULA]. As a first approximation, the attenuation of the external radiation field [FORMULA] by the factor [FORMULA] is adopted to schematize the opacity effects. For the dissociating radiation field a similar approximation is adopted (Rosenzweig et al. 1994). Obviously, by using this first approximation, the effect of the ionizing radiation is minimized, and the study of the internal structure of the cloud is not possible.

For the time dependence of the flux level [FORMULA] we assume a flash like variation. More precisely, during a first period of integration the external radiation flux remains at the assumed background value (i.e. [FORMULA]). The duration of this initial period of integration is large enough (i.e. [FORMULA] yr) to ensure that the cloud is near its thermo-chemical equilibrium state. After this first period of stabilization, it is assumed that both, [FORMULA] and [FORMULA], increase linearly to the value [FORMULA] in a time [FORMULA], and remains at this value during a time [FORMULA]. Then, the flux level is assumed to decrease exponentially with a characteristic time [FORMULA] to the background value [FORMULA] for the ionizing flux, and to [FORMULA] for the dissociating flux. This kind of flux variations are expected in the case when the radiation pulse is assumed to be produced by an intense but short event of stellar formation or by the radiation coming from a front shock. In a few million years after the end of the stellar formation process, the ionizing flux is expected to decrease to background values. On the other hand, due to the contribution of intermediate and low mass stars to the dissociating flux, it is expected that its level remain higher than the background value ([FORMULA]) long after the death of massive stars.

For a given initial state of the cloud, there is a critical background flux level [FORMULA], bellow which the cloud spontaneously cools because the self-shielding allows the formation of [FORMULA] at relatively high concentrations. This critical background flux level is mainly sensible to the initial ion fraction due to its strong influence on the [FORMULA] formation rate. In order to describe this initial state dependence, it is useful to look at the thermo-chemical equilibrium (TCE) curve (i.e. [FORMULA], and [FORMULA]). Fig. 1a shows the TCE curves for two different values of the background flux level (lower curve [FORMULA], and upper curve [FORMULA]) when the mass of the cloud is [FORMULA].

[FIGURE] Fig. 1a and b. The thermo-chemical equilibrium curves for a [FORMULA] cloud exposed to the two labeled values of the background flux level (see text).

Note the three phase structure characterized by the presence of three stable branches (solid lines) denoted in Fig. 1a as W-I (i.e. warm-Ionized; [FORMULA]), W-N (i.e. warm-Neutral; [FORMULA]), and C-N (i.e. cool-Neutral; [FORMULA]). Note also the qualitative difference of the TCE curve for low ([FORMULA]) and high ([FORMULA]) background flux level. That is, for [FORMULA] the left-hand maximum (denoted as [FORMULA]) is over the right-hand maximum (denoted as [FORMULA]), whereas, [FORMULA] for [FORMULA]. This difference is important because if the cloud is initially in TCE in the W-I branch, and the pressure is progressively increased from [FORMULA] to [FORMULA] a transition to the W-N phase occurs in the case [FORMULA], but in the case [FORMULA] the C-N phase is reached. For [FORMULA], Fig. 1b shows the typical isobaric evolution tracks for initially ionized states (arrows A, B, C and D) and for initially neutral states (arrows E, F and G). For cases A, B, and D, as expected the cloud evolves toward the stable branch W-I, W-N, and C-N, respectively. However, in case C, even when [FORMULA] the track reaches the C-N branch transversing the W-N branch due to the inertia of the ionization fraction. More precisely, the excess of the ionization fraction shifts the maximum pressure [FORMULA] of the corresponding thermal equilibrium curve to a value bellow the pressure corresponding to case C. On the other hand, for the initially neutral states the evolution is substantially different. In case E the track stops in the W-N branch; note the difference with case C. In case F the cooling rate is so small that in practice the cloud reaches a quasi-stationary state similar to that in the W-N branch. The small cooling efficiency is due to the very small [FORMULA] formation rate for the low ion fraction in the quasi-stationary W-N state. Finally, for high enough gas pressure as in case G, the cloud reaches the C-N branch. The isobaric evolution tracks for a high background flux level (i.e. [FORMULA]) are similar to those in Fig. 1b except that the W-N branch can not be reached from an ionized initial state as in case B in Fig. 1b. It is interesting to note that when the cloud is in the quasi-stationary state schematized by track F, a large enough ionizing flash is able to increase [FORMULA] formation rate and to stimulate the rapid condensation to reach the C-N branch.

The analysis of the various evolution tracks in Fig. 1b have been made for a fixed background flux level. Taken into account that an increase of the background flux level shift the TCE curve upward, a similar analysis can be made for a fixed pressure but varying the background flux level. Fig. 2a shows, in the constant pressure approximation, the time dependence of the gas temperature for a [FORMULA] cloud subject to the three labeled values of the background flux level [FORMULA]. The initial condition is the same in the three cases and corresponds to an out of equilibrium warm-ionized state at a gas pressure [FORMULA], and [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], and [FORMULA]. The temperature evolution in the three plotted cases differs because for [FORMULA] the system stabilizes in the W-I branch (i.e. as in track A of Fig. 1b), for [FORMULA] the system stabilizes in the W-N branch (i.e. as in track B of Fig. 1b), and for [FORMULA] the system stabilizes in the C-N branch (i.e. as in track C of Fig. 1b). On the other hand, Fig. 2b shows the temperature evolution for the same pressure as in Fig. 2a, but for an initially neutral warm state, (i.e. [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], [FORMULA], and [FORMULA]). In this case, the evolution for [FORMULA] corresponds to the situation schematized by track F in Fig. 1b; that is, the system enters in a quasi-stationary state characterized by a very slow decrease of the temperature. However, for [FORMULA] the system evolves rapidly to the C-N branch, a situation that corresponds to that schematized by track G in Fig. 1b. The results in Figs. 2a and 2b illustrate how the initial cloud state affects the critical value of [FORMULA] below which the cloud evolves toward the C-N branch (i.e. the cloud condenses). In order to show the effect of the constant density approximation, Fig. 2b also shows the temperature evolution for [FORMULA] when the constant pressure approximation is switched to the constant density approximation at the time when the rate of decrement of the cloud radius equals the sound speed.

[FIGURE] Fig. 2a and b. The time dependence of the temperature for a [FORMULA] cloud exposed to the three labeled values of the background flux level and an initial out of equilibrium warm-ionized state (see text).

For initially ionized states at pressure P, the critical value [FORMULA] roughly corresponds to the value of [FORMULA] that produces a maximum in the TCE curve at pressure P. For a high background flux level, the left-hand maximum (denoted as [FORMULA] in Fig. 1a) is the higher maximum and must be equaled to P. For a low background flux level, the right-hand maximum must be equaled to P. On the other hand, for initially neutral states, the critical value [FORMULA] must be calculated by finding the value of [FORMULA] bellow which the evolution does not fall in the quasi-stationary warm-neutral state. The dependence of the critical value of [FORMULA] on the initial cloud state is summarized in Fig. 3 for a [FORMULA] cloud. The results are showed as functions of the initial cloud column density ([FORMULA]). The left-hand side curve corresponds to the critical background flux level for initially ionized states. The upper segment (labeled I-branch) corresponds to background flux levels for which [FORMULA], and therefore, the condition [FORMULA] is used. The lower segment (labeled N-branch) corresponds to the case when the condition [FORMULA] is used because [FORMULA] for these values of [FORMULA]. The initial column density is calculated assuming that initially the cloud is at [FORMULA] and at a pressure [FORMULA] ; the initial concentrations are assumed to be the same as in Fig. 2a. For values of ([FORMULA]) above the left-hand [FORMULA] curve, the initially ionized cloud reaches TCE in the stable warm phase, but below this curve the cool-neutral branch is reached. On the other hand, the right-hand side curve corresponds to the critical background flux level for initially neutral states. In this case, the initial column density is calculated assuming that initially the cloud is at [FORMULA] and the initial concentrations are assumed to be the used in Fig. 2b; the initial density is varied in order to cover the plotted range of [FORMULA]. For values of ([FORMULA]) above the right-hand [FORMULA] curve, the initially neutral cloud attains a quasi-stationary warm-neutral state, but below this curve the cool-Neutral branch is reached. It is to be noticed that as the initial electron concentration increase, the right-hand [FORMULA] curve approaches the left-hand curve. In any case, there exits a set of initial conditions for which the cloud reaches a quasi-stationary warm-neutral state. The point to be emphasized is that these quasi-stationary states are susceptible to be induced to condensate if the cloud is exposed to an intense enough ionizing flash.

[FIGURE] Fig. 3. The dependence of [FORMULA] on the initial cloud column density (see text).

In order to illustrate the effect of the ionizing flash on a cloud that has fallen in the quasi-stationary warm-neutral state, Figs. 4a-c show respectively the time dependence of the temperature, the relative number density of electrons ([FORMULA]), and of hydrogen molecules ([FORMULA]), for a [FORMULA] cloud. The initial condition corresponds to an out of equilibrium warm-neutral state at a gas pressure [FORMULA] (i.e. [FORMULA], [FORMULA], and the initial concentrations used in Fig. 2b). The curves labeled (a) in Figs. 4 are plotted for reference, and correspond to the case when the cloud is subjet to a constant background flux level of [FORMULA]. As expected for [FORMULA], the cloud evolves toward a quasi-equilibrium warm neutral state. The curves labeled (b) and (c) in Figs. 4 correspond to the evolution of the cloud when it is subjected at [FORMULA] yr to a flash. In case (b), the flash characteristics are: [FORMULA] yr, [FORMULA] yr, [FORMULA] yr, [FORMULA], and [FORMULA]. In case (c) the flash characteristics are the same as in case (b) but with [FORMULA]. Notice in Figs. 4 that during the increase of the external radiation flux from [FORMULA] to [FORMULA], the electron density and the temperature increase, whereas the [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] densities decrease. During the time when [FORMULA], the electron density and the temperature continue to increase because the variation of [FORMULA] during the time [FORMULA] is rapid enough to leave the gas far from equilibrium. At the end of the lapse of decrement of [FORMULA], if [FORMULA] is short enough, the gas has an excess of electrons and thermal energy compared with the equilibrium values corresponding to [FORMULA] and [FORMULA]. After the lapse of UV flux decrement, recombination continues, but at a lower rate than the cooling. The excess of electrons at these relatively low temperatures results in an enhancement of the [FORMULA] rate formation. Even when [FORMULA], the abundance of [FORMULA] may reach a large enough value to produce considerable self-shielding. If the cloud reaches a critical value ([FORMULA]) for the optical depth at dissociating frequencies, the [FORMULA] abundance grows very fast, allowing the cooling of the cloud to temperatures of the order of [FORMULA]. This is the situation for case (b) in Figs. 4, where the flash induce rapid cooling even when [FORMULA]. On the other hand, for case (c) a post flash dissociating level with [FORMULA] is enough to inhibit the formation of [FORMULA], and then, the cloud remains warm.

[FIGURE] Fig. 4a. The effect of the ionizing flash [FORMULA] on the the time dependence of the temperature for a [FORMULA] cloud. The curve labeled (a) corresponds to the case [FORMULA]. The curves labeled (b) and (c) correspond to the evolution of the cloud when it is subjected at [FORMULA] yr to a flash (see text).

[FIGURE] Fig. 4b. The time dependence of the relative number density of electrons ([FORMULA]) for the initial and external conditions corresponding to Fig. 4a.

[FIGURE] Fig. 4c. The time dependence of the hydrogen molecules ([FORMULA]), for the initial and external conditions corresponding to Fig. 4a.

A detailed study of the dependence of the cloud evolution on the phase space of free parameters (cloud mass, initial conditions, and flash characteristics) is out of the scope of this simple application. However, such detailed study may reveal that the stimulating condensation process studied here can be effective in a restricted region of the free parameters space, and therefore, may act as a selective effect that contributes to the formation of dense structures at certain scales.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997

Online publication: April 6, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de