![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 327, 1262-1270 (1997) 3. Photo-ionizing radiation flash as trigger of efficient
|
![]() |
Fig. 1a and b. The thermo-chemical equilibrium curves for a ![]() |
Note the three phase structure characterized by the presence of
three stable branches (solid lines) denoted in Fig. 1a as W-I (i.e.
warm-Ionized; ), W-N (i.e. warm-Neutral;
), and C-N (i.e. cool-Neutral;
). Note also the qualitative difference of the
TCE curve for low (
) and high
(
) background flux level. That is, for
the left-hand maximum (denoted as
) is over the right-hand maximum (denoted as
), whereas,
for
. This difference is important because if the
cloud is initially in TCE in the W-I branch, and the pressure is
progressively increased from
to
a transition to the W-N phase occurs in the
case
, but in the case
the C-N phase is reached. For
, Fig. 1b shows
the typical isobaric evolution tracks for initially ionized states
(arrows A, B, C and D) and for initially neutral states (arrows E, F
and G). For cases A, B, and D, as expected the cloud evolves toward
the stable branch W-I, W-N, and C-N, respectively. However, in case C,
even when
the track reaches the C-N branch
transversing the W-N branch due to the inertia of the ionization
fraction. More precisely, the excess of the ionization fraction shifts
the maximum pressure
of the corresponding
thermal equilibrium curve to a value bellow the pressure corresponding
to case C. On the other hand, for the initially neutral states the
evolution is substantially different. In case E the track stops in the
W-N branch; note the difference with case C. In case F the cooling
rate is so small that in practice the cloud reaches a quasi-stationary
state similar to that in the W-N branch. The small cooling efficiency
is due to the very small
formation rate for the
low ion fraction in the quasi-stationary W-N state. Finally, for high
enough gas pressure as in case G, the cloud reaches the C-N branch.
The isobaric evolution tracks for a high background flux level (i.e.
) are similar to those in Fig. 1b except that
the W-N branch can not be reached from an ionized initial state as in
case B in Fig. 1b. It is interesting to note that when the cloud is in
the quasi-stationary state schematized by track F, a large enough
ionizing flash is able to increase
formation
rate and to stimulate the rapid condensation to reach the C-N
branch.
The analysis of the various evolution tracks in Fig. 1b have been
made for a fixed background flux level. Taken into account that an
increase of the background flux level shift the TCE curve upward, a
similar analysis can be made for a fixed pressure but varying the
background flux level. Fig. 2a shows, in the constant pressure
approximation, the time dependence of the gas temperature for a
cloud subject to the three labeled values of
the background flux level
. The initial
condition is the same in the three cases and corresponds to an out of
equilibrium warm-ionized state at a gas pressure
, and
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. The temperature
evolution in the three plotted cases differs because for
the system stabilizes in the W-I branch (i.e.
as in track A of Fig. 1b), for
the system
stabilizes in the W-N branch (i.e. as in track B of Fig. 1b), and for
the system stabilizes in the C-N branch (i.e.
as in track C of Fig. 1b). On the other hand, Fig. 2b shows the
temperature evolution for the same pressure as in Fig. 2a, but for an
initially neutral warm state, (i.e.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
). In this case,
the evolution for
corresponds to the situation
schematized by track F in Fig. 1b; that is, the system enters in a
quasi-stationary state characterized by a very slow decrease of the
temperature. However, for
the system evolves
rapidly to the C-N branch, a situation that corresponds to that
schematized by track G in Fig. 1b. The results in Figs. 2a and 2b
illustrate how the initial cloud state affects the critical value of
below which the cloud evolves toward the C-N
branch (i.e. the cloud condenses). In order to show the effect of the
constant density approximation, Fig. 2b also shows the temperature
evolution for
when the constant pressure
approximation is switched to the constant density approximation at the
time when the rate of decrement of the cloud radius equals the sound
speed.
![]() |
Fig. 2a and b. The time dependence of the temperature for a ![]() |
For initially ionized states at pressure P, the critical
value roughly corresponds to the value of
that produces a maximum in the TCE curve at
pressure P. For a high background flux level, the left-hand
maximum (denoted as
in Fig. 1a) is the higher
maximum and must be equaled to P. For a low background flux
level, the right-hand maximum must be equaled to P. On the
other hand, for initially neutral states, the critical value
must be calculated by finding the value of
bellow which the evolution does not fall in the
quasi-stationary warm-neutral state. The dependence of the critical
value of
on the initial cloud state is
summarized in Fig. 3 for a
cloud. The results
are showed as functions of the initial cloud column density
(
). The left-hand side curve corresponds to the
critical background flux level for initially ionized states. The upper
segment (labeled I-branch) corresponds to background flux levels for
which
, and therefore, the condition
is used. The lower segment (labeled N-branch)
corresponds to the case when the condition
is
used because
for these values of
. The initial column density is calculated
assuming that initially the cloud is at
and at
a pressure
; the initial concentrations are
assumed to be the same as in Fig. 2a. For values of
(
) above the left-hand
curve, the initially ionized cloud reaches TCE in the stable warm
phase, but below this curve the cool-neutral branch is reached. On the
other hand, the right-hand side curve corresponds to the critical
background flux level for initially neutral states. In this case, the
initial column density is calculated assuming that initially the cloud
is at
and the initial concentrations are
assumed to be the used in Fig. 2b; the initial density is varied in
order to cover the plotted range of
. For values
of (
) above the right-hand
curve, the initially neutral cloud attains a
quasi-stationary warm-neutral state, but below this curve the
cool-Neutral branch is reached. It is to be noticed that as the
initial electron concentration increase, the right-hand
curve approaches the left-hand curve. In any
case, there exits a set of initial conditions for which the cloud
reaches a quasi-stationary warm-neutral state. The point to be
emphasized is that these quasi-stationary states are susceptible to be
induced to condensate if the cloud is exposed to an intense enough
ionizing flash.
![]() |
Fig. 3. The dependence of ![]() |
In order to illustrate the effect of the ionizing flash on a cloud
that has fallen in the quasi-stationary warm-neutral state, Figs. 4a-c
show respectively the time dependence of the temperature, the relative
number density of electrons (), and of hydrogen
molecules (
), for a
cloud. The initial condition corresponds to an out of equilibrium
warm-neutral state at a gas pressure
(i.e.
,
, and the initial
concentrations used in Fig. 2b). The curves labeled (a) in Figs. 4 are
plotted for reference, and correspond to the case when the cloud is
subjet to a constant background flux level of
.
As expected for
, the cloud evolves toward a
quasi-equilibrium warm neutral state. The curves labeled (b) and (c)
in Figs. 4 correspond to the evolution of the cloud when it is
subjected at
yr to a flash. In case (b), the
flash characteristics are:
yr,
yr,
yr,
, and
. In case (c) the
flash characteristics are the same as in case (b) but with
. Notice in Figs. 4 that during the increase of
the external radiation flux from
to
, the electron density and the temperature
increase, whereas the
and
densities decrease. During the time when
, the
electron density and the temperature continue to increase because the
variation of
during the time
is rapid enough to leave the gas far from
equilibrium. At the end of the lapse of decrement of
, if
is short enough,
the gas has an excess of electrons and thermal energy compared with
the equilibrium values corresponding to
and
. After the lapse of UV flux decrement,
recombination continues, but at a lower rate than the cooling. The
excess of electrons at these relatively low temperatures results in an
enhancement of the
rate formation. Even when
, the abundance of
may
reach a large enough value to produce considerable self-shielding. If
the cloud reaches a critical value (
) for the
optical depth at dissociating frequencies, the
abundance grows very fast, allowing the cooling of the cloud to
temperatures of the order of
. This is the
situation for case (b) in Figs. 4, where the flash induce rapid
cooling even when
. On the other hand, for case
(c) a post flash dissociating level with
is
enough to inhibit the formation of
, and then,
the cloud remains warm.
![]() |
Fig. 4a. The effect of the ionizing flash ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 4b. The time dependence of the relative number density of electrons (![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 4c. The time dependence of the hydrogen molecules (![]() |
A detailed study of the dependence of the cloud evolution on the phase space of free parameters (cloud mass, initial conditions, and flash characteristics) is out of the scope of this simple application. However, such detailed study may reveal that the stimulating condensation process studied here can be effective in a restricted region of the free parameters space, and therefore, may act as a selective effect that contributes to the formation of dense structures at certain scales.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: April 6, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de