Astron. Astrophys. 330, 412-418 (1998)
3. Results
3.1. Gas and stellar kinematics
Fig. 1 presents stellar and gaseous velocity fields for the
central part of NGC 2685, and Fig. 2 presents stellar and
gaseous velocity fields for the central part of IC 1689. In both
cases one can see that the stars rotate around the minor axes as it
must be in disk galaxies, and the gas rotates around the major axes as
if it is coupled with the more outer gas of polar rings.
In NGC 2685 the gas and star isovelocities are strictly
orthogonal, and systemic velocities determined by the gaseous and
stellar velocity fields are the same, namely, 860 km/s. In
IC 1689 the picture is more complex. The stellar isovelocities
are consistent with a circular rotation of stars in the plane of
galactic disk. A systemic velocity determined by using this velocity
field is 4470 km/s. An absence of systematic wavelength-scale shift is
checked by measuring a night-sky emission line [OI]
: a whole set of the night-sky line-of-sight
velocity measurements shows a gauss-like distribution with a mean of
-3 km/s and a dispersion of 17 km/s. Particularly, the measurement of
[OI] in the spectrum of the nucleus has given a
value of -16 km/s. Since our estimate of the systemic velocity of the
stellar component in IC 1689 differs strongly from that of
Hagen-Thorn & Reshetnikov (1997), we have checked the result of
cross-correlation by a direct gauss approximation of the magnesium
absorption lines (5167.3+5172.7) and
in the spectrum of the nucleus. Though a
accuracy of such approximation is lower than that of
cross-correlation, we have obtained km/s and
4471 km/s, consequently, in full agreement with the above mentioned
systemic velocity derived from the cross-correlation. A systemic
velocity determined by using the gas velocity field is higher by some
150 km/s - 4620 km/s. Gas isovelocities in the center of the galaxy
are turned by some 45o with respect to both isophote axes,
major and minor, and only at the radii more than 5" we see an ionized
gas rotating in a plane orthogonal to the plane of the galaxy: it is
an inner polar ring seen also on ultraviolet (U) broad-band
image (van Gorkom et al. 1987). A line-of-sight velocity difference
between the ring and the nuclear gas is km/s,
in agreement with the long-slit data of Hagen-Thorn & Reshetnikov
(1997). Excitation mechanisms of emission-line spectra are quite
different in the ring and in the nucleus: the ratio [NII]
in the ring is consistent with a star-forming
activity, and the nucleus lacking at all (only
[NII] is present) is a typical LINER. This
result was firstly obtained by Hagen-Thorn & Reshetnikov (1997)
too.
A two-dimensional velocity field gives a unique opportunity to
clarify a geometry of rotation and mass distribution. In the case of
planar circular rotation a azimuthal dependence of central
line-of-sight velocity gradients would be a pure cosine law with a
maximum at the line of nodes (isophote major axis):
sin i cos ,
where is deprojected angular rotation
velocity, i is an inclination of rotation plane, and
is an orientation of the line of nodes
(isophote major axis). In the case of triaxial potential there must be
a non-zero line-of-sight velocity gradient along the isophote minor
axis.
Fig. 3 presents azimuthal dependencies of central
line-of-sight velocity gradients for the ionized gas and stars in
NGC 2685 and IC 1689, and Table 2 contains results of
fitting these dependencies by cosine laws. (Photometric
characteristics are taken from Peletier & Christodoulou, 1993, for
NGC 2685 and from Reshetnikov et al., 1995, for IC 1689).
They confirm the impressions given by Figs. 1 and 2.
![[FIGURE]](img24.gif) |
Fig. 3. The azimuthal dependencies of central line-of-sight velocity gradients for the stars and ionized gas in NGC 2685 and IC 1689. The solid lines present cosine laws fitted by the least-square method
|
![[TABLE]](img26.gif)
Table 2. Parameters of fitting the azimuthal dependencies of central line-of-sight velocity gradients for the stars and gas in NGC 2685 and IC 1689
The dependencies for NGC 2685 are quite perfect cosine ones;
the dynamical major axis of the stars coincides with the photometric
major axis while orientations of inner and outer isophotes are the
same. All these facts provide evidence for a axisymmetric mass
distribution and circular rotation of the main body of the galaxy.
Thus, the nuclear ionized gas also rotates circularly, but in the
plane which is orthogonal to the plane of the galactic disk. As it was
noted earlier (e.g. Shane 1980), the nuclear ionized gas in this
galaxy must be related to the neutral and molecular hydrogen of the
polar ring. The only thing which is not clear is why the angular
rotation velocities of the gas and stars differ in such a way: our
estimate of the gas velocity dispersion inside ,
200 km/s, is higher than the published estimates of the stellar
velocity dispersion, 60-114 km/s (Whitmore et al. 1990, Di Nella et
al. 1995, McElroy 1995), so one might expect that nuclear gas rotates
slower than stars; but we observe an opposite difference. After
excluding non-circular motions and strongly different rotation plane
inclinations (both stellar and gaseous subsystems seem to be seen
edge-on), only different spatial resolution remains: as gas velocity
gradients are measured closer to the center than those of stars, their
higher values may signify that there is an unresolved drop of rotation
velocity near (let us remind that the seeing
was not too good during the CCD observations of NGC 2685 in the
green spectral range - see Table 1). In other words, the nucleus of
NGC 2685 may be dynamically decoupled.
The azimuthal dependencies for IC 1689 look less definitive.
The dynamical major axis of stars is turned by 11o with
respect to the line of nodes (outer isophote orientation), and a turn
of photometric major axis between the innermost and the outermost
regions is also 11o, but in opposite sense (Reshetnikov et
al. 1995). These small discrepancies may be inside errors of
measurements, but if they are real, it may be an evidence for a mild
triaxiality of the galaxy.
3.2. Stellar contents of the nuclei
Fig. 4 presents radial profiles of absorption-line index
Mgb in the central parts of NGC 2685 and IC 1689 (for
a definition of the absorption-line indices - see Worthey et al.
1994). In both cases one can see a prominent magnesium-strength break
between the nucleus and the surrounding bulge. If we treat this break
as due only to metallicity variations, we can estimate a value of
metallicity break by using single-age model calibrations of Worthey
(1994). It reaches 0.7 dex for NGC 2685 and 0.5 dex for
IC 1689.
![[FIGURE]](img29.gif) |
Fig. 4. Azimuthally-averaged magnesium-line strength profiles for NGC 2685 (two sets of measurements) and for IC 1689
|
For NGC 2685 we have plotted two independent measurement sets:
in 1993 with IPCS as a detector and in 1994 with CCD. (The nuclear
spectrum in 1993 had a low signal-to-noise ratio and is not plotted).
In this particular case a accuracy of the Mgb index
measurements has appeared to be good enough even with IPCS: the
difference between two data sets does not exceed 0.1 Å anywhere
except the points at . The discrepancy at
is naturally explained by the seeing difference
(see Table 1): a seeing FWHM of 2.5" in 1994 affects the
measurements at this radius. Though a radius range under consideration
is rather small, we may suspect a presence of Mgb gradient in
the bulge of NGC 2685. If we take the measurements in the radius
range 2.5"-7" - 4 points obtained in 1993 and 3 points obtained in
1994, - they are nicely fitted by a linear law:
.
Therefore even if we take a difference between the nuclear
Mgb and the central bulge Mgb extrapolated by using this
linear law, we would still obtain Å
( ). The metallicity gradient measured in the
bulge, , is slightly higher than usual
metallicity gradients in bulges of early-type disk galaxies which
ranges from 0 to -1 (Balcells & Peletier 1994). It is interesting
that Peletier & Christodoulou (1993) have noted that the nucleus
of NGC 2685 is distinguished by its red colour, and in the bulge
the gradient is absent.
In IC 1689 we detect an enhancement of the magnesium-line
strength in both the nucleus and at a radius of
, where the polar ring crosses the major
axis.
Fig. 5 may help us to check if the magnesium-strength breaks
in NGC 2685 and IC 1689 are due only to the metallicity
differences. It presents a ( ) diagram which
provides age-metallicity disentangling. Since
emission is quite absent inside in both
galaxies, we are sure that absorption line is
not contaminated by an emission in the nuclei and in the innermost
bulge regions, and the age diagnostics is valid. But the outer points
- two in NGC 2685 and three in IC 1689 - must be excluded
from the consideration due to a noticeable emission contamination of
their . After examining Fig. 5 we conclude
that stellar population in the nucleus of NGC 2685 is rather old,
of 10 billion years or older, and a age gradient along the radius is
undetectable. Meanwhile the decoupled nucleus in IC 1689 may be
as young as of 5 billion years, and the innermost bulge may be much
older. Unfortunately, for this galaxy we have only one point in the
inner bulge which absorption line is not
contaminated by an emission, so for we can
estimate only upper limits of the stellar population ages, and the
result on age difference between the nucleus and the inner bulge is
marginal. But we must keep in mind that if the nucleus is much younger
than the bulge, the metallicity difference corresponding to the same
is higher. In the case under consideration it
reaches 0.7 dex instead 0.5 dex reported above.
![[FIGURE]](img42.gif) |
Fig. 5. The diagram ( ) for age-metallicity disentangling in the nuclei and bulges of NGC 2685 and IC 1689. The measurements are made at the positions shown in Fig. 4; the nuclear positions are identified. The models are taken from Worthey (1994), the ages are given in the legend in billion years. Two outer points for NGC 2685 and three outer points for IC 1689 are shifted down by a weak emission
|
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: January 16, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |