Astron. Astrophys. 330, 641-650 (1998)
3. The disappearance of gas pressure inversions
3.1. Effects of convection
As seen above, a -inversion must develop at
the Eddington limit in hydrostatic equilibrium. One should ask,
however, whether strong convection may take place to prevent it, since
the ionization zone causing the high opacity and thereby the
super-Eddington luminosities also favours convection. In fact, a
super-Eddington luminosity in the diffusion regime automatically
requires the presence of convection as shown by Langer (1997a).
Generalizing Langer's derivation for a non-negligible radiation
pressure to also include the effects of ionization, the Schwarzschild
criterion for the onset of convection is
equivalent to
![[EQUATION]](img25.gif)
(e.g. Mihalas & Weibel Mihalas 1984). Here
, while x denotes the ionization fraction
of the most abundant element with an ionization potential
. Convection must be initiated as
(r) approaches unity, since the right hand side
is always less than 1. Thereby the radiative flux and hence
diminishes when convection is efficient. The
Eddington limit can therefore not be exceeded in adiabatic convection
zones in the stellar interior and hence
-inversions will not develop. Thus, inversions can only be present in
non-adiabatic convection zones close to the stellar surface.
It should be remembered that the location of the Eddington limit is
dependent on the convection treatment. A
-inversion will for example disappear if the density scale height is
applied instead of the normal pressure scale height for the
calculation of the convective flux through the mixing length theory.
The mixing length theory is rarely a good description of stellar
convection, and in particular for these extreme situations it may be
very misleading. Ultimately, hydrodynamical simulations will be
necessary to investigate the effects of convection on
-inversions.
3.2. Effects of mass loss
Using the momentum equation one can investigate under which
conditions a -inversion can exist in the
presence of a stellar mass loss. Or equivalently: which mass loss
rates can one expect from a star if the super-Eddington luminosities
would instead drive a stellar wind?
In the presence of a stellar outflow, the equation of hydrostatic
equilibrium must be replaced with the momentum equation:
![[EQUATION]](img28.gif)
where we have restricted ourselves to the one-dimensional,
time-independent case. Also other external forces, such as turbulent
forces ( ) and centrifugal forces
( ), can be contained in
besides radiation. It should therefore be kept in mind that the
possibility of an instability may be underestimated when restricting
the following discussion to only radiative forces, as other forces
also tend to be destabilizing (e.g. Nieuwenhuijzen & de Jager
1995; Langer 1997a,b; Owocki & Gayley 1997).
Together with a constant, spherically symmetric mass loss rate
, and the equation of state
, it is possible to rewrite the momentum
equation into the so called "wind equation":
![[EQUATION]](img34.gif)
where the isothermal sound speed defined by
has been introduced. By an inspection of Eq. 6, it is possible to
determine under which circumstances - or
-inversions are allowed. In normal cases, d
/dr in the surface
layers and therefore the parenthesis on the right hand side of Eq. 6is
positive as long as a temperature inversion is not present, which is
not possible in optically thick layers with a radiative flux.
Therefore, if but , the
velocity gradient must be negative. Since a
constant has been assumed, a density inversion
will be present if and therefore a
-inversion is possible (though not required).
If, on the other hand, while
, then must be positive,
and the density gradient cannot be positive: a density inversion
cannot exist. Since a -inversion requires a
density inversion, neither inversion can occur in the stellar
atmosphere despite the super-Eddington luminosities. Again the
possibility of a temperature inversion has been neglected. A
sufficient criterion for the disappearance of a
-inversion is therefore that the outflow velocity due to mass loss is
high enough ( ).
The critical mass loss rate can be estimated by comparing
with . The values for
and will be taken from
static models, which is justified for these rough estimates, since the
atmosphere below the sonic point is normally little affected by mass
loss. A model atmosphere with K, log
[cgs] and solar abundances requires a critical
mass loss rate . Hence
-inversions can exist in stars despite high mass loss rates. Achmad
& Lamers (1997) have arrived at similar conclusions and estimates.
They also verify the finding numerically with dynamical steady state
atmospheres, though not altogether self-consistently.
An even higher critical mass loss rate is found for the R CrB
stars. The lack of hydrogen makes the continuous opacity significantly
lower than for solar abundances and hence the density at a given
optical depth will be correspondingly greater, typically by a factor
of 50 (Asplund et al. 1997a). Since the density is higher, the outflow
velocity will be lower in order to carry the same
. A similar model as above but with abundances
typical for R CrB stars, will therefore require
. The mass loss rates of R CrB stars are poorly
known, in particular since it may be episodic, but rough estimates
suggest (e.g. Feast 1986), orders of magnitude
smaller than .
It is concluded that -inversions are not an
artifact of hydrostatic equilibrium but may also exist in dynamical
steady state atmospheres, even with a high mass loss rate.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: January 16, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |