![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 330, 990-998 (1998) 2. Observations2.1. Optical and near infrared observationsTable 1 presents the details of the observations in the six wavebands. The observations in the V, R and I bands were carried out during June 1992 at the 3.6m CFHT (Canada France Hawaii Telescope) on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, using the FOCAM instrument with the RCA4 10242 CCD detector. Flat fields have been obtained in each photometric band on the sky during twilight. The CCD electronics offset was measured several times during the night. For each photometric band, various standard stars were repeatedly observed during the night. Table 1. Log of observations in the V, R, I, J, H and K bands At the F/8 focus of the telescope, the CCD pixel scale was 0.21".
The observations in the J and H bands have been obtained in November
1992, also at the CFHT, using the visitor "MONICA" Nicmos 3 infrared
camera (Nadeau et al. 1994) at the same F/8 focus. At these
wavelengths, the resolution is 0.25" per pixel. The observations in
the K band have been obtained on September 1992 at the 2.2m telescope
of the ESO observatory of La Silla, Chile, using the common-user
IRAC2a CCD camera with a resolution of 0.49" per pixel. In the optical
bands, two fields slightly overlapped were observed, surveying an area
of 16 square arcminutes. In the three NIR bands, sixteen fields were
observed toward the Serpens cluster, approximately covering an area of
12 square arcminutes in J and H, and 19 square arcminutes in K. These
fields were arranged in a 4x4 mosaic centered on the Serpens
Reflection Nebula ( 2.2. Data analysisThe NIR data were reduced by first subtracting from each data frame
a median filtered sky frame obtained from five nebulosity-free frames,
observed immediately before and after the target observation. The J
and H band images were then flat-field and distorsion corrected with a
dedicated software. Finally, the images were mosaicked together.
Nominal atmospheric extinctions for Mauna Kea are
Data analysis was done with standard Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (IRAF) and Interactive Data Language (IDL) routines. As a first step, several isolated stars of different intensities were chosen manually to determine the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM). Thus, for each image, source extraction and aperture photometry were performed using DAOPHOT (Stetson, 1987), and the routine DAOFIND was used to extract stellar-like sources whose fluxes were significantly above the background (that is, sky) noise in each image. The results were visually compared to the images at several contrast levels to ensure that spurious identifications were minimized. Such spurious detections were a problem in the area of the bright reflection nebula where probably non stellar emission knots could be interpreted as stars. We removed all these spurious sources from our data sample listed in Table 2. This led undoubtedly to the non-detection of faint sources in the area of the image where contamination from extended emission was present. In addition, sources that were not bright enough to be detected by the finding routine, but visually identified as stars, were appended to the coordinate list. Finally, the resulting images were mosaicked with an IDL routine. This routine eliminated bad pixels and adjusted the relative background level of overlapping frames to a common value. Using these procedures, 5, 12, 20, 44, 86 and 138 stars were found in the V, R, I, J, H and K mosaic images, respectively. Aperture photometry was performed for all the extracted stars in each image. Fluxes were determined for each star with the size of the software aperture used varying along with the brightness of the source (the brighter the source, the larger the software aperture). Sky levels were determined around each star in a 5-pixel wide
annulus. Sky levels were also obtained for annuli with smaller inner
radii and larger outer radii with no significant change in the
resulting stellar fluxes. Photometry was performed manually for stars
which were confused with nearby nebulosity or other stars. For objects
with associated NIR nebulosity, we considered that the true stellar
flux is represented by the signal in the object aperture minus the
contribution from the average sky plus nebulosity in the sky annulus.
In the K band, a cross-correlation between our survey and the one of
Eiroa & Casali (1992) on the brighter common sources has been used
to assess 2.3. Magnitude uncertainties and sensitivity limitsFor each detected source, we evaluated the magnitude uncertainty by
where In order to determine the sensitivity limits, we considered a 3
In this case, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998 Online publication: January 27, 1998 ![]() |