 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 331, 193-210 (1998)
3. The ROSAT images
3.1. Image analysis
The ROSAT PSPC images each have exposures
10 ksec. Table 1 gives the (J2000) sky
coordinates of the field centers, exposure times, galactic coordinates
of the clouds and their adopted distances.
![[TABLE]](img22.gif)
Table 1. Description of the fields observed by ROSAT
The energy range optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the
sources was established after examination of the detector background
spectrum (Fig. 1). The "soft" band (0.1-0.4 keV) spectrum obtained
from sourceless regions of the images cannot be distinguished from the
spectra of the whole image including the sources. This probably has
two causes: the background is high in this range, and the source soft
emission is reduced by extinction. We have thus kept for analysis only
the "hard" spectral band, 0.4 - 2.4 keV.
![[FIGURE]](img23.gif) |
Fig. 1. ROSAT spectrum of the Mon R2 PSPC image, with (black squares), and without (open circles) the integrated source contribution. The sources are buried in the background below 0.4 keV, restricting the useful energy range to 0.4 - 2.4 keV. The figure would be almost exactly the same for the Rosette PSPC image.
|
Figs. 2a and 2b show the PSPC images of our target clouds.
Sourceless regions in each image were selected, avoiding both the
underexposed parts corresponding to the shadow of the mirror structure
and bright diffuse areas (Sect. 3.2), to evaluate the mean background.
In units of counts arcmin-2 ksec-1, the
background level is 4.4 1.0 10-2 for
Monoceros and 4.2 0.9 10-2 for
Rosette. Figs. 2a and 2b also show enlargements of the central region,
the inner 35' within the mirror support
structure, which provides the best angular resolution and sensitivity.
The PSPC images are displayed in the form of contours in Figs. 3a and
3b, superimposed on a digitized optical image (Sect. 4.1.1). These
figures also show an outline of the PSPC field; the deviations from
overall circular shapes are due to the wobbling of the satellite.
![[FIGURE]](img27.gif) |
Fig. 2a. ROSAT observations of the Monoceros cloud in the 0.4-2.4 keV range. The entire image is obtained by smoothing the photon distribution with a Gaussian of =2 pixels (15"/pix). The 35' inner region is shown enlarged with a Gaussian smoothing of =1 pixel. The 3' 6' central region, indicated by an arrow, shows part of the JHK survey area of Carpenter et al. (1997).
|
![[FIGURE]](img39.gif) |
Fig. 3a. ROSAT X-ray contours from the Monoceros field image of Fig. 2a superimposed on a digitized POSS(R) plate. The inner dashed lines show the ROSAT center field within the window support structure. The outer dashed lines show the effective field of view with the window support shadow.
|
![[FIGURE]](img152.gif) |
Fig. 3b. Same as Fig. 3a. for the Rosette cloud area. The optical emission nebula is visible in the NW corner.
|
3.2. Source detection and extended features
Several tens of X-ray sources were detected in each image by using
the ROSAT Standard Analysis Software System (SASS). Some have
low ratios and could be spurious. Following
FCMG and CMFA, we have measured the local of
each source, and other weak localized excesses that were missed by the
SASS process. Adopting a criterion that reliable X-ray sources have
, we found 41 sources for Monoceros and 21 for
Rosette. Seven (Monoceros) and eight (Rosette) excesses have
, and some are positionally well-correlated with
IR and/or visible sources (Sect. 4.2). In view of the Poissonian
nature of the PSPC noise, a few of these low S/N sources must be real.
In order not to introduce uncertainties in the statistics, however,
the low S/N sources will not be used in our present analysis, but we
give their list for possible future reference.
The resulting source lists are given in Table 2 (Monoceros) and
Table 3 (Rosette). In these tables, col. [1] gives the running number
of the ROSAT sources in the form "Mon X-n " and "Rosette
X-n "; col. [2] the RXJ ROSAT source designation; cols.
[3] and [4] give their equatorial coordinates (in J2000), corrected
for boresight error in the ROSAT aspect solution (Sect. 4);
col. [5] gives the positional errors in arcsec provided by the SASS;
col. [6] gives the off-axis distance in arcmin; col.[7] gives the
count rates measured in the 0.4 - 2.4 keV band and their statistical
errors; col.[8] gives the obtained as described
in FCMG; col.[9] gives the logarithm of the approximate X-ray
luminosity and their statistical errors,
derived assuming a typical average extinction
(Sect. 5.1). The other columns correspond to optical stellar
identifications described in Sect. 4 below.
![[TABLE]](table2.gif)
Table 3. a. ROSAT sources detected in Rosette field
Table 3. b. Rosette additional possible X-ray sources
![[TABLE]](img36.gif)
In addition to the point sources, two types of extended features
are present. First, a large diffuse feature is seen near the NNW edge
of the Rosette image. The point spread function is quite extended
here, so it is a priori not possible to distinguish between
unresolved emission of faint point sources and a truly diffuse
emission. The problem is particularly relevant because the X-ray
structure coincides with the edge of the optically bright HII region
excited by the O star cluster. Second, bright "hot spots" are seen
closer to the axis in both fields, corresponding to tight clusters of
partially resolved X-ray sources. The nature of these hot spots will
be discussed in Sect. 6.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: February 4, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |