 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 331, 821-828 (1998)
2. Observations and results
We used the archival ROSAT and ASCA data of
1E1207.4-5209 (see MBC96 and V97 for a detailed description).
Four ROSAT Position Sensitive Proportional Counter (PSPC)
pointings (obtained in July 1993, with exposure times about
5-6 ks each - see Table 2 in MBC96) were centered at
different positions (off-axis angles between
and ). We checked that the spectra of
1E1207.4-5209 extracted from each of the four data sets and
properly corrected for the PSPC response are consistent with each
other. For the combined analysis with the ASCA data we chose
the ROSAT PSPC observation with the minimum off-axis angle
(exposure time
ks). With the aid of the MIDAS/EXSAS package (Zimmermann et
al. 1994) we extracted a raw spectrum from a region with a radius
centered on the source and subtracted the
background spectrum estimated from an annulus with the inner radius
r and outer radius . (The backgrounds for
observations with other ROSAT and ASCA instruments were
estimated in the same manner). The (off-axis) source count rate is
s-1. We binned the source
spectrum in the 0.1-2.4 keV energy range into 24 spectral bins
with signal-to-noise ratios greater than 5. The ROSAT HRI
counts for each of the three on-axis pointings (obtained in August
1992 and July 1994; total exposure time
ks) were selected from the circles of .
The corresponding source count rate is
s-1, in agreement with MBC96.
The ASCA data were obtained in July 1994, with two Solid
State Imaging Spectrometers, SIS0 and SIS1, in the "2-CCD bright"
mode, and two Gas Scintillation Imaging Spectrometers, GIS2 and GIS3,
in the "pulse-height" mode. The SIS1 image of 1E1207.4-5209 is
too close to the edge of the CCD chip for a reliable spectral
analysis. To reduce the ASCA data, we used the FTOOLS/XSELECT
software (v. 3.5). The SIS0 source counts collected in
ks (with "high" and "medium" bit rates)
were extracted from the circle of , the total
source count rate is s-1. The
SIS0 spectrum was binned into 38 spectral bins (with minimum number of
counts equal 20) in the 0.4-10.0 keV range. The GIS2 and GIS3
source counts were extracted from circles of
(exposure ks for the high plus medium bit
rates). The source count rates are (GIS2) and
s-1 (GIS3). The spectra were
binned into 39 and 46 spectral bins (with the same binning scheme as
for SIS0) in the 0.2-10.0 keV range for GIS2 and GIS3,
respectively. The total source count rates for all the three
ASCA instruments are somewhat lower than those reported by V97,
perhaps because of different screening criteria we applied. The SIS0
and GIS spectral responses (redistribution matrix and ancillary
response files) were created with the standard FTOOLS codes "sisrmg"
and "ascaarf".
For our spectral analysis we used the XSPEC package (v. 9.01)
with its standard fitting. As a first step, we
fitted the count rate spectra simultaneously for the four
instruments, ROSAT PSPC and ASCA SIS0, GIS2, and GIS3,
with the traditional power-law and BB models. Fig. 1 shows the
results of these fits. The power-law fit yields a photon index
and a hydrogen column density,
(minimum ,
; the uncertainties hereafter are at a 90%
confidence level). These values of and
are better constrained than those obtained by
MBC96 from the PSPC data alone, and
(minimum ,
). The photon index is unusually large in
comparison with typical values, , observed from,
e.g., X-ray emitting radio pulsars (Becker & Trümper 1997),
and the hydrogen column density significantly exceeds the values
obtained by independent measurements (see below). These discrepancies
imply that the power-law interpretation is inadequate.
![[FIGURE]](img63.gif) |
Fig. 1. 68%, 90% and 99% confidence contours ( , 6.3 and 11.3, respectively) for the power-law and blackbody simultaneous fits to the ROSAT PSPC and ASCA SIS0, GIS2 and GIS3 spectra of 1E1207.4-5209. The lines in the right panel correspond to constant values of radius of emitting area at a distance kpc.
|
The BB temperature (as measured by a distant observer),
K, the apparent radius of the emitting
area, km, and the bolometric luminosity,
erg s-1, obtained from
the combined fit (Fig. 1) are very close to the values from the
separate fits of the ROSAT and ASCA data by MBC96 and
V97. The hydrogen column density in the combined fit,
, is compatible with
inferred from the separate ROSAT PSPC spectrum. Although the
quality of the BB fit is better than the quality of the power law fit,
the values look surprisingly low in comparison
with the cm-2 obtained from
independent estimates (see Sect. 1).
Since thermal NS spectra, as well as spectra of ordinary stars,
cannot exactly coincide with the BB spectra because of the effects of
radiative transfer in the emitting layers, it is natural to compare
them with more realistic model spectra of NS atmospheres (e.g., Pavlov
et al. 1995). Strongest deviations from the BB spectrum are
expected if the NS surface is covered with a hydrogen atmosphere.
Hydrogen may appear at the NS surface as a result of, e.g., accretion
of interstellar matter or post-supernova accretion of a fraction of
the ejected envelope. Due to the huge surface gravity (typical
gravitational acceleration
cm s-2), heavier chemical elements sink down in
deeper layers and do not affect the properties of emitted radiation,
whereas hydrogen remains at the surface. The shape of the spectrum
emitted by an atmosphere depends on the strength B of the NS
surface magnetic field. The lack of pulsations does not allow one to
estimate B using the pulsation period and its derivative, as is
usually done for pulsars. The absence of statistically reliable
features in the observed spectra (see Fig. 2), which could be
associated with an electron cyclotron line at
keV, prevents one to make a direct estimation of B.
Therefore, one has to try the atmosphere models with both low
( G) and high magnetic fields. (In the
former case, the field does not affect the properties of emergent
radiation [Zavlin et al. 1996], so that we can merely put
). In the case of strong nonuniform field
( G), the NS should have a nonuniform
temperature distribution along its surface because of the high
anisotropic thermal conductivity in the NS crust (e.g., Shibanov &
Yakovlev 1996). However, since we have no information about the field
geometry, we assume that the magnetic field has the same strength and
is directed radially everywhere at the surface, and that the effective
temperature is uniform. This assumption reduces the number of fitting
parameters and can be considered as a reasonable first approximation
for investigating the atmosphere effects.
![[FIGURE]](img78.gif) |
Fig. 2. Count rate spectra observed from 1E1207.4-5209, together with the best-fit hydrogen atmosphere model spectra for G (cf. Fig. 3). The residuals (in units of ) are shown separately for the four instruments. The spectra of SIS0 and GIS3 are reduced for clarity by factors of 10 and 20, respectively.
|
Fig. 3 shows results of fits of the combined ROSAT and
ASCA data with hydrogen atmosphere models for three fixed
values of the magnetic field. In these fits we assume canonical values
for the NS mass and radius, and
km, and consider the distance as a
fitting parameter. The models with (left
panels) and G (right panels) result in
close values of the distance, effective temperature at the NS surface
and bolometric luminosity, kpc,
K,
erg s-1, and kpc,
K,
erg s-1, for and
G, respectively. Since the nonmagnetic
spectra are softer at lower energies, the hydrogen column density at
, , is lower than for the
strong magnetic field, . We checked that folding
the models within the 90% confidence region with the ROSAT HRI
response yields count rates compatible with those observed. When the
field strength varies in the range G, the
fitting parameters remain approximately the same because the model
spectra are almost insensitive to the B value in the
corresponding domain of energies and effective temperatures. When
B exceeds G, the proton cyclotron
line centered at keV
(cf. Bezchastnov et al. 1996) enters the SIS energy range,
which makes the fits statistically unacceptable. (This line moves
above keV, the maximum energy where the
NS flux is still above the background [Fig. 2], at superstrong
magnetic fields, , for which the models we used
here are not directly applicable.) When B falls below
G, the low-energy wing of the electron
cyclotron line gets into the ASCA range, and the model spectra
become softer at keV. As a result, the
confidence contours in the -d and
- planes move to greater
d and , and lower ,
towards the BB contours. An example is shown in the middle panels of
Fig. 2 for G, for which the best-fit
distance is about 50% larger than at G.
When the field is lower than G, but
greater than G, the atmosphere model fits
become statistically unacceptable because the core of the electron
cyclotron line gets into the ASCA /ROSAT range.
![[FIGURE]](img102.gif) |
Fig. 3. 68%, 90% and 99% confidence contours for the NS hydrogen atmosphere fits to the the combined ROSAT and ASCA data for , km, and three values of the surface magnetic field B.
|
The atmosphere models depend not only on B, but also on the
NS mass and radius which determine the gravitational acceleration (one
of our model parameters) and the gravitational redshift factor
, where ,
. To illustrate this effect, we present in
Fig. 4 the best-fit parameters at G
in a wide range of R and M allowed by equations of state
of the NS matter. Although the effective temperature at the NS
surface, , varies by about
in the allowed R -M domain, the
apparent effective temperature (as measured by a distant observer),
, remains almost constant,
K, because the redshift is compensated
by the change of the unredshifted NS spectrum (it softens in the Wien
tail with increasing M and decreasing R at given
). Owing to the approximate constancy of
, the apparent and "true" bolometric
luminosities depend on R and M as
and . The latter
dependence explains the non-monotonous behavior of
at higher M. The best-fit d and
are almost independent of M at higher
R, when is close to 1. At lower
R the variations are stronger, albeit within the statistical
uncertainties of these parameters (cf. Fig. 2). The distance
inferred at assumed R and M can be approximately
described, in the allowed mass-radius domain, by a linear equation:
(in kpc); it grows with R faster than
for the BB interpretation. Notice that if d is determined more
accurately in future observations of the SNR and its central source,
this equation would delimit a band in the M -R plane
constraining equation of state of the NS matter.
![[FIGURE]](img118.gif) |
Fig. 4. Dependences of the best-fit parameters for the atmosphere fits on the NS radius R at different values of the NS mass, . The thick dashed lines delimit the ranges of the apparent temperature and luminosity (upper and lower dashed curves correspond to and 0.8, respectively).
|
Since the hydrogen atmosphere fits yield
greater than the BB fit by a factor of 3-5, it is important to
estimate this parameter independently. For this purpose, we fitted the
SNR emission with various models for thermal plasma radiation. We
extracted the SNR spectrum from a bright region of the ROSAT
PSPC image of the remnant shell within the
circle centered at , .
Three models available with the XSPEC package, "vraymond", "vmeka",
and "vmekal" (Raymond-Smith, Mewe-Gronenschild-Kaastra, and
Mewe-Kaastra-Liedahl models with variable abundances) give
satisfactory fits ( ) with the column density to
the SNR in the range of cm-2,
consistent with the hydrogen atmosphere fits of 1E1207.4-5209, but
certainly in excess of the BB fits. The inferred plasma temperature is
K. These results were obtained with a
moderate excess of abundances of Al and Si whose emission lines are
prominent in the SIS spectra of the SNR shell. Abundances of other
elements are close to standard values. The SNR parameters inferred
from our fits are consistent with those obtained by Kellett et
al. (1987) from the EXOSAT data. The lower hydrogen
density, , obtained by V97, is likely
associated with fixed cosmic abundances adopted, which resulted in
lower statistical quality of their fits ( ).
Note, however, that the emission models we and V97 used assume a
single-temperature plasma in collisional ionization equilibrium. Both
the temperature nonuniformity and nonequilibrium ionization may
significantly affect the SNR X-ray emission (see, e.g., Bocchino et
al. 1997, and references therein), so that the inferred SNR
parameters, particularly the element abundances and temperature, may
not be very accurate.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: March 3, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |