![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 331, 1051-1058 (1998) 3. Collision broadening formalismsUnder the Van der Waals interaction, the interaction constant
where
Once the interaction constant is obtained, the damping per perturber can be computed as
where v = average relative velocity of the atom and perturber (Unsöld 1955, Eq. (82,48); Gray 1992, Eq. (11.31,34)). Most of the variety amongst computations of collision broadening arises in the approximation used for computing the mean square radii of the levels. Several of these are described below. 3.1. Scaled hydrogenic approximationThe scaled hydrogenic approximation for the mean square radius of excitation state i is
where Z is the effective nuclear charge seen by the electron
(1 for Fe I, 2 for Fe II, etc.), l is the orbital angular
momentum quantum number of state i, and
I being the ionisation energy of the atom (in eV), and
3.2. Unsöld's approximationA widely adopted approximation is that due to Unsöld (1955),
which differs from the hydrogenic approximation by not retaining the
term 3.3. Simmons & Blackwell enhancementBased on fits to the wings of strong lines with accurately known
gf values, Simmons & Blackwell (1982) derived the damping
coefficients of a number of neutral iron lines empirically, and
determined what enhancements were required to Unsöld's formalism.
Their enhancements to 3.4. WIDTH6 approximation for the iron peak elementsKurucz's WIDTH6 program is widely used for computing the abundances of stellar absorption lines. The approximation used there for lines in the iron peak elements (scandium to nickel inclusive), based on Kurucz's own computations of wave-functions, is
where S is the number of electrons in the ion under
consideration. Furthermore, WIDTH6 neglects the lower level entirely,
adopting This approximation differs considerably from those presented earlier. It needs to be borne in mind that Kurucz was motivated to compute synthetic spectra of strong lines of the iron group whose upper states were 4p (Kurucz & Furenlid 1979). Consequently his approximation was tailored to these strong lines for which broadening clearly mattered, rather than to much weaker lines. 3.5. Anstee & O'Mara formulationAn alternative formulation by Brueckner (1971), which retains the
full interaction potential rather than treating it as a series
expansion in Anstee, O'Mara & Ross argue the value of using strong (damped) lines in preference to weak lines for abundance analyses once the broadening is known, since strong line wings are not sensitive to microturbulence or NLTE effects in line cores, and because of the relative ease of measuring strong lines. The last of these depends on the degree of line blending and on the reliability of the continuum placement. Despite these advantages, the absence of strong lines for many elements, especially in metal poor stars, means that weak-line analyses will retain their importance.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998 Online publication: March 3, 1998 ![]() |