Astron. Astrophys. 332, 610-628 (1998)
2. Basic equations
All the equations needed to calculate the Hanle effect produced by
a depth-dependent magnetic field, for a line formed with complete
frequency redistribution, are given in this section. They generalize
equations obtained in FS91 for the case of a magnetic field with a
uniform (constant with depth) azimuthal angle. Many of the equations
to be given here have already been published, but are spread out in
several articles, not all of them with easy access (such as
Faurobert-Scholl 1993). Hence the presentation here of a complete set
of equations.
2.1. Polarized line radiative transfer equation
In the presence of a weak magnetic field, the radiative transfer
equation for the Stokes vector may be written as
![[EQUATION]](img3.gif)
where is the scalar absorption profile
function (Landi Degl'Innocenti 1985). All the sign conventions, and
the symbols for the physical quantities have the same meaning as in
FS91 : is the frequency averaged line optical
depth, x is the frequency separation from line center, measured
in Doppler width units, is the propagation
direction of the ray where is the co-latitude
and is the azimuth of the
ray. The positive optical depth is measured in the direction opposite
to the vertical axis (see Fig. 1). For
lines formed with complete frequency redistribution, the vector source
function is independent of frequency and may be
written as
![[EQUATION]](img18.gif)
where is a given primary source term and
is the Hanle phase matrix. In this paper all
matrices are denoted with italic letters accentuated with a hat. As in
FS91 and Landi Degl'Innocenti (1985), we neglect depolarizing
collisions. The main results of this paper are independent of this
simplifying assumption. Depolarizing collisions can be introduced by
making a vector instead of scalar (Landi
Degl'Innocenti et al. 1990).
![[FIGURE]](img16.gif) |
Fig. 1. Geometry specifying the direction of the magnetic field and of the line-of-sight . Angles and are the co-latitudes of and , respectively. The azimuthal angles and are measured starting from the x -axis in the anti-clockwise direction in the xy -plane
|
The vector magnetic field is characterized
by its strength B and by the angles and
defined as shown in Fig. 1. The full Hanle
phase matrix is a matrix which couples together
the three Stokes parameters I, Q and U but does
not couple them to the Stokes parameter V. Here we are
interested in the Hanle effect on the linear polarization of spectral
lines. We may thus consider only the three-component Stokes vector
and source vector . The
primary source term is assumed to be of thermal origin. Hence it is
unpolarized and we may write it as where
, with the Planck
function at the line center frequency. An explicit analytical
expression of the Hanle phase matrice was first
given by Landi Degl' Innocenti & Landi Degl' Innocenti (1988).
2.2. The azimuthal Fourier expansion method
In a 1D medium, in the absence of magnetic field and of incident
collimated radiation, the radiation field is axially symmetric, i.e.
it does not depend on the azimuth . This is no
longer true when a magnetic field is present. It is well known that
the non-axisymmetric transfer problem of Rayleigh scattering
polarization can be simplified by expanding the azimuthal angle
dependence of the specific intensity and source vector (see
Chandrasekhar 1960 p. 250). This method is generalized for the Hanle
scattering problem in FS91, where the azimuthal angle dependence of
and is expanded in a
Fourier series with respect to the azimuthal angle difference
, where is assumed to be
depth-independent. Here we present a more general formulation, where
and are expanded in
Fourier series with respect to . It can thus be
used in cases where varies with depth.
Because of its -periodicity with respect to
the variable , the specific intensity vector may
be expanded as
![[EQUATION]](img34.gif)
where
![[EQUATION]](img35.gif)
The Hanle phase matrix may be expanded in a two-dimensional Fourier
expansion with respect to and
. In FS91 and Faurobert-Scholl (1993) it was
shown that this expansion is limited to terms of order 2. Namely,
![[EQUATION]](img38.gif)
Explicit expressions of the Fourier coefficients were also given,
however with some misprints.
2.3. Fourier coefficients of the Hanle phase matrix
The Fourier components may be written as
linear combinations of matrices which depend only on the angular
variables µ and µ' with scalar coefficients
which depend only on the magnetic field variables
and B. Namely,
![[EQUATION]](img40.gif)
In the particular case ,
![[EQUATION]](img42.gif)
where is the isotropic matrix all the
elements of which are zero except the element (1,1) which is unity.
The coefficients are complex scalars whereas
the matrices have real elements.
A remarkable property of the Hanle phase matrix is that it has a
diadic representation. It is of the same nature as the diadic
representation for Rayleigh scattering introduced by Domke (1971; see
also Ivanov 1995). The matrices can be
factorized as tensor products of two vectors depending on
µ and µ' respectively and the isotropic
matrix as the tensor product of two constant vectors. Furthermore,
only six vectors are necessary to construct the
Hanle phase matrix. We indeed have
![[EQUATION]](img48.gif)
and
![[EQUATION]](img49.gif)
The index i depends on k and m and the index
j on l, m. Table 1 shows how to obtain
i and j for positive values of k and l.
For example . The symmetry relations
and provide the
for negative values of k and/or
l.
![[TABLE]](img53.gif)
Table 1. Values of the indices i and j for Eq. (9)
The vectors are given by :
![[EQUATION]](img54.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img55.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img56.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img57.gif)
The parameter W is the standard
atomic depolarization factor which is equal to unity for a transition
, . Note that all the
are proportional to W.
The coefficients , ,
may be written as
![[EQUATION]](img63.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img64.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img65.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img66.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img67.gif)
The notation stands for complex
conjuguate.
All the coefficients ,
can be expressed in terms of the :
For and all values of k :
![[EQUATION]](img73.gif)
For and all values of l :
![[EQUATION]](img75.gif)
For ( is the product
of k by l) :
![[EQUATION]](img78.gif)
For :
![[EQUATION]](img80.gif)
The coefficients satisfy symmetry relations.
For :
![[EQUATION]](img82.gif)
For ,
![[EQUATION]](img84.gif)
The symmetry relations satisfied by the ,
which for simplicity are henceforth denoted by ,
are also shown in Table 2. The depend thus
only on 15 different coefficients which are given in
Eq. (39).
![[TABLE]](img86.gif)
Table 2. Symmetries of the coefficients
2.4. Fourier expansion of the Stokes source vector S
Substituting the azimuthal Fourier expansions of
and in Eq. (2), we
can perform analytically the azimuthal integration over
. This yields the azimuthal Fourier expansion of
the source vector. As the Hanle phase matrix has no Fourier component
of order higher than 2, the same property holds for the source vector.
The complex Fourier components of the vector
, defined as in Eq. (4), are given by
![[EQUATION]](img91.gif)
where is the Kronecker symbol. Since we have
an axially symmetric primary source term, only the Fourier component
has an inhomogeneous term. In the following we
prefer to deal with real quantities (as in FS91). Boldface
calligraphic uppercase letters accentuated with a tilde are used to
denote the complex Fourier components. For the real Fourier
components, we change the calligraphic font to an italic font and
replace the tilde by an horizontal line. Boldface calligraphic
uppercase letters are also used for the Stokes vector and associated
source function.
The real Fourier components are given by
![[EQUATION]](img93.gif)
The Fourier expansion of may then be written
as
![[EQUATION]](img94.gif)
Each vector is a three-component vector.
However for symmetry reasons, the azimuthal average of Stokes U
vanishes. Thus , which is the azimuthal average
of , has only two components.
2.5. Factorization of the Fourier source vector
Following FS91, we introduce a new vector
defined by
![[EQUATION]](img98.gif)
It is a 14-component vector since is a
2-component vector, while the other are
3-component vectors. A 14-component vector denoted by
is constructed in a similar fashion with the
components of the real Fourier expansion coefficients
of . It satisfies the
radiative transfer equation :
![[EQUATION]](img103.gif)
Using Eqs. (7)-(28) and (30), it is straightforward, although
lengthy, to show that can be written in the
factorized form
![[EQUATION]](img105.gif)
A key property of (32) is that and
are six-component vectors. Hereafter all
six-components vectors are denoted with boldface italic uppercase
letters. The matrices and vectors appearing in this equation are
defined in the following sub-sections.
2.5.1. The irreducible mean intensity J
The vector is defined by
![[EQUATION]](img109.gif)
It is directly related to the six irreducible tensors introduced by
Landi Degl'Innocenti et al. (1990) in their density matrix formalism
of the Hanle effect (see also Landi Degl'Innocenti 1984). The
difference between the vector of this paper
and the vector introduced in Paper I and
in FS91 is that has no factor
and does not include the primary source term
(see Eq. (14) in Paper I). It is a
six-component vector while is a two-component
vector. In analogy with Paper I, we denote the first two
components of by and
, whereas the other components are denoted by
and .
2.5.2. The matrices and
is a matrix. In
symbolic notation, it may be written as
![[EQUATION]](img120.gif)
To obtain the explicit expression it suffices to replace the line
vectors by their three components, except for
and for which only the
first two components are being used (the vectors
are given in Eqs. (10) to (13)). Because
of the block structure of , the first two
components of and of
the vector depend only on the azimuthal
average of (i.e. on ,
the third and fourth components depend only on
the Fourier components whereas the fifth and
sixth components, , depend only on
.
is a matrix which
is the transpose of . In symbolic notation, it
may be written as
![[EQUATION]](img133.gif)
Here the are three-component column vectors,
except for and which,
as above, are two-component vectors. Clearly,
is made of three blocks. The first block,
which contains the first two elements of the first row, is identical
to the matrix of Paper I.
2.5.3. Primary source term
The second term in the r.h.s. of Eq. (32) is a primary source
term. It comes from the first term in the r.h.s. of Eq. (27). It
is easy to see that
![[EQUATION]](img139.gif)
and hence that . Being able to write the
primary source term in this factorized form is necessary to arrive at
the reduced problem described in Sect. 3. If the primary source
term in Eq. (2) is not isotropic and unpolarized this
factorization may not hold. A simple method for overcoming this
difficulty is to write the Stokes vector as
![[EQUATION]](img141.gif)
where is the solution of the problem with
the internal source but no scattering term. A
similar decomposition is used in Ivanov (1995) for Rayleigh scattering
and in Ivanov et al. (1997) for resonance polarization. In the
transfer equation for the diffuse radiation field
, the primary source term is then of the
required form. When there are no internal primary sources but an
external non-axisymmetric incident radiation field
, the same technique applies. It is now the
directly transmitted field created by the incident radiation which
should be subtracted from the total field.
2.5.4. The matrix
The matrix depends
only on the magnetic field strength B and its co-latitude
. Except for the first row and the first column,
it is almost the matrix of the coefficients ,
. Taking into account the symmetries of the
shown in Table 2,
may be written as
![[EQUATION]](img149.gif)
where
![[EQUATION]](img150.gif)
where
![[EQUATION]](img151.gif)
The dimensionless parameter , which depends
on the intensity of the magnetic field, is given by
![[EQUATION]](img153.gif)
where is the Larmor frequency of the
electron in the magnetic field, is the
Landé factor of the upper level and A the destruction
rate of the upper level alignment. It is the sum of the radiative,
inelastic and depolarizing collision rates (see e.g. Bommier 1996,
Eq. (32)). We note here that the matrix
differs from the one in FS91. The elements to
have opposite signs.
2.5.5. The matrix
The matrix may be written as
![[EQUATION]](img160.gif)
where
![[EQUATION]](img161.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img162.gif)
The matrix comes from the factor
in Eq. (27) and
from . This factor yields a rotation matrix
which becomes when it is commuted with
. The matrix is a
unitary matrix. It satisfies .
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: March 23, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |