SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 332, 610-628 (1998)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

3. The irreducible transfer equation

The transfer equation (31) for the vector [FORMULA] is simpler than the original transfer equation (1) for the Stokes vector [FORMULA], because the real Fourier components [FORMULA] do not depend on the azimuth. However the source term [FORMULA] is still a function of two variables : the optical depth [FORMULA], and the co-latitude [FORMULA] of the ray. The factorization of [FORMULA], given in Eq. (32), suggests to introduce a new radiation field [FORMULA], and a new source function [FORMULA], that depends only on the optical depth, defined by :

[EQUATION]

We shall refer to the six-component vectors [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] as the "irreducible radiation field" and "irreducible source vector". Eq. (32) shows that

[EQUATION]

where

[EQUATION]

When [FORMULA], the matrix [FORMULA] becomes an unit matrix and so does [FORMULA]. The vector [FORMULA] has already been defined in Eq. (36). Introducing Eq. (45) into Eq. (33), we can rewrite [FORMULA] as

[EQUATION]

The irreducible radiation field satisfies the transfer equation

[EQUATION]

Left multiplying this equation on both sides by [FORMULA] and commuting the matrix multiplication with the derivative with respect to [FORMULA], we indeed recover the transfer equation for [FORMULA].

We can now establish a vector integral equation for the irreducible source vector [FORMULA]. It will be the basis for the iterative method presented in Sect.  4. Following the standard method, we first write the formal solution of Eq. (50). Using then Eqs. (47) and (49), we obtain :

[EQUATION]

where T is the optical thickness of the medium and [FORMULA] the matrix defined in Eq. (48), the other three arguments being dropped for convenience.

The matrix [FORMULA] is defined by

[EQUATION]

It is a [FORMULA] matrix which may be written as,

[EQUATION]

The first [FORMULA] block is identical to the kernel matrix for axisymmetric resonance polarization problems. The kernels [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] were introduced by Landi Degl'Innocenti et al. (1990). We recall that [FORMULA] is normalized to unity and [FORMULA] to zero. All the kernels [FORMULA], [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] have the same normalization, viz.,

[EQUATION]

The [FORMULA] and their primitives [FORMULA], defined by

[EQUATION]

are shown in Fig. 2 for the case [FORMULA] and positive values of [FORMULA] (remember that they are even functions of [FORMULA]). The [FORMULA] and their primitives are positive except for [FORMULA] and [FORMULA]. They decrease algebraically to zero at large optical depths and increase logarithmically as [FORMULA]. The properties of the propagating kernels [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] and of the mixing kernel [FORMULA] have been discussed at length in Paper I. The kernels [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] play a similar role as [FORMULA].

[FIGURE] Fig. 2. The Hanle scattering kernels [FORMULA] (upper panel) and their primitives [FORMULA] (lower panel) in lin-log scales for Voigt profile with a damping parameter [FORMULA] and [FORMULA]. The normalization of [FORMULA] is given by [FORMULA]

To end this section we briefly comment on Eq. (51). It looks very much like the vector integral equation for resonance polarization in zero magnetic field considered in Paper I. However the true kernel of this integral equation is the product [FORMULA]. When [FORMULA] depends on optical depth, the integral equation is not of the Wiener-Hopf type since the kernel is not a displacement kernel. When [FORMULA] is a constant matrix, the Wiener-Hopf character is maintained. However, in contrast with resonance polarization in zero magnetic field, the kernel is not a symmetric matrix and hence the transport operator is not self-adjoint. We stress also that in this equation all the components of [FORMULA] are coupled inspite of the fact that the matrix [FORMULA] has a very simple structure (see Eq. (53)).

For completeness we give below the analytical expressions of all the non-zero elements of [FORMULA] :

[EQUATION]

[EQUATION]

[EQUATION]

[EQUATION]

[EQUATION]

The [FORMULA] are the usual exponential integral functions.

We note here for further use that [FORMULA] also satisfies an integral equation. Combining Eqs. (51) with (47) we readily obtain

[EQUATION]

where

[EQUATION]

For a non-polarized primary source of thermal origin, [FORMULA] with

[EQUATION]

[FORMULA] is also given by Eq. (63) with [FORMULA] in place of [FORMULA].

Thanks to the transformations carried out in the preceding sections, the calculation of the Stokes vector [FORMULA] has been reduced to the solution of the vector transfer equation (50) where the vector source function [FORMULA] depends only on optical depth and satisfies the integral equation (51). We solve it in the next section by an operator perturbation method.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998

Online publication: March 23, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de