Astron. Astrophys. 332, L61-L64 (1998)
3. The reliability of observed HI lines
The profiles shown in Fig. 1 need further investigation concerning
possible problems associated with instrumentation and data processing.
It must be excluded that any spurious intensities would result from
the baseline correction or from the stray-radiation correction
procedure.
We repeated the reduction of the LDS to check whether the
procedures (described by Hartmann 1994) could be responsible for the
observed HVD components. In the LDS reduction, third-order baselines
had been fitted to emission-free parts of the spectra (Hartmann 1994,
Sect. 2.3.4). Additionally, partial baselines had been fitted and
subtracted, as had sine-wave ripples (assumed to be caused by standing
waves between the telescope dish and receiver).
It seemed conceivable that the removal of partial baselines had
produced artifacts which could be interpreted as an HVD component. In
repeating the reduction we therefore did not subtract any partial
baselines. For the determination of emission-free line channels we
introduced additional constraints. For each box of pointed
observations within an area of we calculated
the variance of the signal. All channels showing fluctuating lines
were eliminated from the emission-free regions. Thus any emission
which varies noticeably with position (clouds) or time (interference)
was suppressed. After elimination of the obvious line emission around
0 we excluded an
additional range of 30 at both wings of the line
from the emission-free regions. Excluding unreliable channels at the
edges of the bandpass, we fitted a third-order baseline over the
velocity range -430 380
. Sine-wave ripples were eliminated in a similar
way as described by Hartmann (1994). To exclude any possible software
problems, the code for the entire reduction procedure was rewritten.
The data reduction process was iterated several times to find optimum
boundary conditions for the baseline determinations. For the majority
of the observations, good baselines could be achieved this way.
However, severe interference caused a number of profiles to fail the
fitting routine regardless of the boundary conditions.
To identify profiles which were affected by interference we used
the recorded temperature of the 21-cm receiver.
Abnormally high or low values (by
%) were assumed to indicate bad observations.
We rejected all observations for which fluctuations in
exceeded 10% of the running mean. In addition
we rejected all profiles with an rms-noise exceeding the average noise
by a factor of 4, as well as those affected by interference spikes
with amplitudes exceeding the noise by a factor of 10. Profiles which
passed these criteria were found to have well-defined baseline regions
free of line emission. On average the baseline was defined by 417
channels, corresponding to 50% of the analyzed velocity range. Due to
our restrictions 28% of the observations were
excluded from the analysis.
As mentioned in Sect. 2, systematic spurious intensities due to
reflections from the ground (Hartmann et al. 1996) limit the accuracy
of the LDS. Such lines with dispersions
and intensities up to 50
mK affected the analysis of the profiles averaged over
predominantly between latitudes
(Westphalen, 1997). Based on 2700 spectra
showing the typical signature of reflections from the ground, a proper
correction for such reflections was calculated and applied to the
entire LDS data set. The first attempts to correct profiles for ground
reflections by Hartmann et al. (1996) had failed because a significant
fraction of the test profiles were affected by interference. This
problem could be overcome as described above only after analyzing a
large number of affected profiles for this purpose.
We further checked our data for additional systematic errors in the
stray radiation correction. Any increase of a side- or back-lobe level
did not affect the profile wings at the most extreme velocities, but
only introduced significant errors in the velocity range of the main
line components. We therefore compared the dispersions of
stray-radiation profiles and HVD components. Stray radiation profiles
were decomposed into Gaussian components using the same criteria as
for the analysis of corrected profiles. Forcing the broadest component
to fit the extreme profile wings we found that the dispersion of the
stray radiation components is significantly smaller than the HVD
components identified in the corrected profiles.
Fig. 3 shows the average velocity dispersions of the broadest stray
radiation components which were removed from the spectra, along with
the dispersions observed in the averaged profiles. Not only are the
stray-radiation velocity dispersions systematically smaller than those
of the HVD component, they are uncorrelated with galactic latitude.
The latitude dependence of the HVD component is the strongest evidence
that this emission is genuine. The systematic uncertainties due to
residual stray radiation are estimated to be
5-15 mK, well below the 50 mK amplitude
observed for the HVD component.
The data obtained after such a restrictive reduction as described
above are incomplete, but in an unbiased manner, and can be used to
estimate the uncertainties which may have affected the profiles
plotted in Fig. 1. No preference can be given to neither the original
dataset nor the revised version (both corrected for reflections from
ground). Thus positive or negative deviations have the same
probability. The uncertainties estimated this way are plotted in Fig.
2 for . No comparison can
be made for latitudes since in this range the
reliability of the baselines may be affected by extended wings of the
conventional H I emission. We rejected profiles
for which less than 300 channels were used to fit the baseline. To
allow a comparison with the model calculations given in Sect. 4, we
have also plotted the model data in Fig. 2. The amplitudes of the
model exceed 50 mK while the baseline-uncertainties of the analyzed
averaged profiles are at most 15 mK. We conclude that our data
reduction leads essentially to the same results as the reduction by
Hartmann (1994). The correction for reflections from ground is
essential for an analysis of weak lines. Residual errors in the stray
radiation corrections are probably in the range 10 to 20 mK, hence too
small to affect the HVD components found in all latitudes.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: March 30, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |