SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 333, 379-384 (1998)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

5. Discussion

Eddington envelopes require fine tuning of the luminosity in order to produce extended envelopes. It appears unlikely that the luminosity is held within such a tight region. More reasonably, either the average luminosity will be sub-critical at the base, and the envelope will collapse, or the luminosity will be super-critical at the base, and the envelope will grow (and thereby radiate at lower temperatures between [FORMULA] 80,000 K and [FORMULA] 20,000 K as shown in Fig. 2) and eventually reach the most extended hydrostatic model or the wind solutions, as described in Sect.  2. This scenario may be valid only if convection is efficient. The stellar structure equations are not as tractable if convection is inefficient, and we have not attempted to solve them here.

We reiterate that the remarkable feature of extended envelopes is that they could reprocess much of the hard radiation produced by a tidal disruption event into the optical band. Bolometric corrections would drop from [FORMULA]  magnitudes to 1-2. The color temperatures of the objects may be slightly higher than the effective temperatures due to suppression of absorption processes at such low densities, but such changes are expected to be about a factor of two (see the work on neutron stars by Babul & Paczynski (1987)). Even scattering-dominated envelopes retain their important property of producing optically bright flares.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998

Online publication: April 15, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de