 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 333, 629-643 (1998)
2. Observational constraints
During the past years, many observational campaigns have been
conducted to obtain new accurate measurements of the rotation rates of
low mass stars of various ages. Efforts were made both to determine
and rotational periods, and were especially
conducted to determine rotational velocities of slow rotators,
during pre-main sequence phase and in young clusters. For our
computations I use a census of both and period
determinations from various authors.
I divide our observational sample in three mass bins: 0.9 to
1.1 stars are compared to 1
model. 0.6 to 0.9
stars are compared to 0.8 and 0.6 models.
And masses lower than 0.6 are compared to
0.5 model.
For T Tauri stars I used period determinations when available, or
when star's radius is known (Bouvier et al.
1986, 1990, Hartmann et al. 1997, Hartmann & Stauffer 1989, Walter
et al. 1988). In the case of T Tauri stars, the sample is too small to
be divided, and I use the same initial conditions over the full mass
range. This leads to angular velocities for CTTS at the age of
106 yr, between 2 and 10 , i.e 10 and
30 km .
Recent observations of post TTS (PTTS or naked TTS), discovered in
the Chameleon and Lupus star forming regions from the ROSAT all-sky
survey show a widening of the distribution of velocities with age
(Wichmann et al. 1997, Covino et al, 1997, Bouvier et al. 1997a). The
maximum velocity increases during the pre-main sequence and up to the
arrival on the main-sequence (ZAMS). The PTTS cover an age spread
between 1 Myr and a few 10 Myr. An interesting issue, in the case of
PTTS, is the existence of a bias among X-ray selected observations
against slow rotators, as activity is directly correlated to rotation.
If this is the case, this bias would lead to an apparent lack of slow
rotators during the PTTS phase. It is especially true for 0.6 to
0.9 stars (see Fig. 13). How serious
is this problem cannot be investigated for the moment, because of the
poorness of the sample of post-TTS for which is
known.
Among young clusters there is a large dispersion of velocities:
IC2602, IC2391 (30 Myr,Stauffer et al. 1997b), Alpha Persee
(50 Myr, Prosser 1992, 1994, Stauffer et al. 1989, 1993), and the
Pleiades (80-100 Myr, Soderblom et al. 1993, Queloz et al. 1997a,
1997b). In Alpha Per , velocities of 1
stars extend from a few km up to
200 km , while in the Pleiades maximum
velocity has decreased down to 50 km . In
Alpha Per the fraction of very slow rotators (
10 km ) is around
30 % (Allain et al. 1997). In the Pleiades this fraction is
(Allain et al. 1996).
M 34 (250 Myr, Jones et al. 1997), and M 7 (220 Myr Prosser et al.
1995) are intermediate clusters between the Pleiades and the Hyades
ages (600 Myr, Radick et al. 1987, Stauffer et al. 1997c). On the main
sequence, solar-type stars all have low rotation rates.
Important differences from one mass bin to another occur in young
clusters and later. The time of the arrival on the main sequence
depends on mass, and at the age of the M 34/M 7 clusters a one solar
mass star is already on the main sequence, while a 0.5
has just arrived on the ZAMS. In the Pleiades,
the maximum velocity for 1 stars is
50 km , while it is 100-150 km
for lower masses. The
studies in this cluster show that the distribution of velocities is
also mass-dependent: for spectral types later than G0, the minimum
rotation rate increases with decreasing mass (Stauffer et al. 1997c).
In the Pleiades cluster the proportion of stars with velocities lower
than 10 km is about 35% for solar-mass
stars, and is about 65% in th 0.6-0.9 mass range. (Allain et al, 1996,
Queloz et al. 1997a, 1997b). In the cluster M 34, there is more spread
in the velocities in the 0.6-0.9 mass
range than in the 0.9-1.1 mass range (7 -
45 km , 5 - 15 km
, respectively). For the Hyades cluster,
differences are even more striking and Radick et al. (1987) found a
tight relationship between rotation period and mass down to 0.6
: the lower the mass, the lower the velocity. For
masses lower than 0.6 , the Hyades stars still
exhibit a dispersion of velocities comparable to the dispersion in M
34 for 0.6-0.9 stars (Stauffer et al., 1997a),
meaning that very low-mass stars still undergo a significant
braking.
Most of the angular velocities presented here (see e.g
Fig. 11) come from measurements, and are
thus lower limits to the true angular velocities.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: April 20, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |