Astron. Astrophys. 333, 687-701 (1998)
5. The global iteration procedure
For integration of the system of ordinary differential equations
(20) - (24) we have to know the mean intensity
and the divergence of radiation flux at each
cell center of the shock wave model. On the other hand, the radiation
transfer equation (50) can be solved only when the extinction and
emission coefficients are given in each cell center. In order to take
into account a coupling between gas material and radiation field we
employ the iteration procedure. If the initial approximation is enough
close to the final solution, we may hope that each iteration will give
a better approximation for the final solution than the previous one.
In Fig. 1 is shown the flow chart where the main steps of the
global iteration procedure are depicted.
![[FIGURE]](img148.gif) |
Fig. 1. The flow chart of the global iteration procedure
|
Within the whole shock wave both the radiation field and atomic
level populations are in a strong departure from LTE. This feature is
the principal difficulty accompanying the shock wave model
calculations because it is responsible for the narrow convergence area
of global iterations. In particular, the use of the initial LTE
approximation allows the converged solution to be obtained only for
the weak shock waves with upstream Mach numbers
. For larger upstream velocities the initial
oscillation amplitude of the solution vector
becomes so large that some quantities fall beyond their physical
meaning. In order to alleviate this difficulty and to be able to
consider the structure of stronger shock waves we computed a grid of
the shock wave models with gradually increasing upstream Mach number,
the LTE initial approximation being used only for the first model with
the Mach number . Thus, each model of the grid
with exception of the first one was computed with initial
approximation obtained from the previous converged model having
somewhat smaller upstream velocity. The upstream velocity increment
was in the range . For test purposes some
models were computed with different initial conditions taken from
shock wave models with both larger and smaller upstream velocities. In
all such cases the shock wave structure was found to converge to s
single solution.
In order to describe the convergence of global iterations we
introduce for each component of the solution vector
at the -th iteration
the quantity
![[EQUATION]](img154.gif)
specifying the maximum absolute relative change of the variable
y across the whole shock wave model. A typical behaviour of
global iterations is shown in Fig. 2 displaying in the upper
panel the maximum absolute relative change of the electron temperature
and the divergence of radiative flux within the whole shock wave
model. On the lower panel of Fig. 2 is shown the iterative change
of the total radiative flux emerging ahead the
shock wave. Thus, if the initial approximation is good enough, we
obtained in all cell centers of the model the exponentially decaying
oscillations of the solution vector. The global iterations were
stopped when relative changes of variables ceased to decrease. The
final relative changes of the solution vector depend on the both
spatial resolution of the discrete model and accuracy of integration
of differential equations (20) - (24). It should be noted also that
the convergence of global iterations appreciably varies for different
regions of the shock wave. In particular, the convergence is best in
the radiative precursor and thermalization zone, whereas in the
recombination zone becomes slower. Thus, the convergence plots shown
in Fig. 2 display mostly variations of the solution vector in the
vicinity of the outer boundary of the postshock region.
![[FIGURE]](img156.gif) |
Fig. 2. Upper panel: convergence plots for the electron temperature (solid line) and the divergence of radiative flux (dot-dashed line) given by the maximum absolute relative change . Lower panel: convergence plot for the total radiative flux emerging from the outer boundary of the preshock region
|
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: April 20, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |