Astron. Astrophys. 333, 687-701 (1998)
6. Results of calculations
In this paper we discuss the results of calculations done for the
shock waves with upstream velocities propagating
through the unperturbed hydrogen gas of temperature
and density
( ). In total we computed 46 models with
upstream velocity increment of . The outer
boundary of the preshock region, where the gas is assumed to be
unperturbed, is set at cm. Calculations
were done for the two-level hydrogen atom, the first atomic state
being treated in non-LTE. The radiation transfer equation was solved
for the both Lyman and Balmer continua ( ).
Thus, the frequency point nearest to the Lyman edge frequency
was set at . More
extensive calculations for the larger number of bound atomic states
L and hydrogen continua as well as for
various temperatures and densities
of the unperturbed gas will be given in the
forthcoming paper.
The most fascinating feature of radiative shock waves is that they
demonstrate the strong interaction between gas material flows and the
radiation field which they produce. This interplay is best seen from
the plots of the divergence of radiative flux as a function of the
spatial coordinate X. One of such plots is shown in
Fig. 3. By definition, the divergence of radiative flux is
negative, if the fluid absorbs more energy than emits and, therefore,
is heated. And conversely, when , the gas
radiatively cools since it radiates more energy than it absorbs.
![[FIGURE]](img168.gif) |
Fig. 3. The divergence of radiative flux against the spatial coordinate in the shock wave model with
|
As is seen in Fig. 3, the divergence of radiative flux is
always negative in the preshock zone, the departure of
from zero gradually increasing while the gas
approaches the discontinuous jump. Heating of the precursor gas
material is due to absorption of the Lyman continuum radiation, hence
the region, where the divergence of radiative flux
perceptibly deviates from zero, extends over a
few units of the optical depth at frequency
.
The properties of the radiation field do not change appreciably
across the discontinuous jump. The spatial resolution of our shock
wave models near the discontinuous jump is limited by the space
interval cm. The change of
and over this interval
increases with increasing upstream velocity but
does not exceed 0.3% for . Thus, just behind
the discontinuous jump the divergence of radiative flux goes on to
gradually decrease and reaches the minimum in the vicinity of the
maximum of the electron temperature . The rapid
growth of the divergence of radiative flux behind its minimum implies
that the gas material flows into the radiatively cooling zone. For the
shock wave model with the distance between
maximum and minimum of is
cm and corresponds to the optical depth
between these layers of . It should be noted
that both the minimum and maximum of the divergence of radiative flux
as well as other properties of the shock wave very strongly (for some
variables nearly exponentially) depend on the upstream velocity
.
6.1. The radiative precursor
At the outer boundary of the preshock region the first level of the
hydrogen atom is approximately in LTE since the Lyman continuum
radiation emerging from the postshock region is negligible. Both the
Saha-Boltzmann relation and equations of statistical equilibrium give
nearly the same (within a few per cent) the hydrogen ionization degree
of . The main sources of opacity are bound-free
transitions in the Lyman continuum (i.e. at frequencies
) and at lower frequencies the Rayleigh
scattering by hydrogen atoms in the ground state. The free-free
opacity and the Thomson scattering are negligible. With approaching to
the discontinuous jump the hydrogen ionization degree increases, so
that the both free-free opacity and Thomson scattering increase but
nevertheless even for they remain negligible
within the entire preshock region.
The radiative precursor is revealed as the part of the preshock
region where the hydrogen gas is heated and is ionized by the Lyman
continuum radiation emerging from the postshock region. The
temperature of heavy particles (neutral hydrogen atoms and hydrogen
ions) remains constant
( ) in the radiative precursor. In Fig. 4
are shown the plots of the electron temperature
and the hydrogen ionization degree as a
function of the distance from the discontinuous jump for the shock
wave models with upstream velocities , 45, 50
and . As is seen, the perceptible heating and
ionization occur at distances from the discontinuous jump smaller than
. The distance
corresponds to the optical depth of . Thus, for
the geometrical thickness of the radiative
precursor approximately does not depend on the upstream velocity.
![[FIGURE]](img188.gif) |
Fig. 4. The hydrogen ionization degree (upper panel) and the electron temperature (lower panel) in the preshock region of the shock wave models with upstream velocities , 45, 50 and
|
Within the radiative precursor the hydrogen gas and radiation field
are in strong departure from LTE. In particular, ionization of
hydrogen atoms is mainly due to radiative transitions, whereas
collisional recombinations appreciably exceed collisional ionizations.
Fig. 5 shows the rates of radiative transitions
and as well as the
collisional rates and
as a function of X for the shock wave
model with . The precursor transition rates are
very sensitive to the upstream velocity . For
example, for upstream velocities the rates of
ionizations from the ground state increase in the ranges
and , respectively.
However, notwithstanding such a strong dependence on
, for all shock wave models the spatial
dependencies of transition rates were found to be qualitatively
similar to those displayed in Fig. 5.
![[FIGURE]](img198.gif) |
Fig. 5. The rates of ionizations (solid lines) and recombinations (dashed lines) against the distance from the discontinuous jump in the pre-shock region of the shock wave model with
|
The growth of the hydrogen ionization degree with approaching to
the discontinuous jump is accompanied by the increase of the gas
pressure gradient. The corresponding decrease of the gas material
velocity becomes, however, perceptible only for
. For example, at the inner boundary of the
preshock region the relative decrease of U is
for and is
for .
Of great interest are the physical conditions at the inner boundary
of the preshock region. For the models considered in the present study
the spatial coordinate of this boundary is
cm. For upstream velocities both the
hydrogen ionization degree and the electron temperature nearly do not
change within the preshock region. These quantities show the
perceptible dependence on upstream velocity only for
. In Table 1 we give the hydrogen
ionization degree , the electron temperature
as well as the transition rates at the inner
boundary of the preshock region. For the sake of convenience the
upstream velocity is given in
.
![[TABLE]](img208.gif)
Table 1. The properties of the preshock inner boundary
The electron temperature just ahead the discontinuous jump
increases with increasing upstream velocity nearly exponentially. For
the shock wave models of the present study this dependence can be
approximately expressed due to the following fitting formula
![[EQUATION]](img209.gif)
where the upstream velocity is expressed,
for the sake of convenience, in .
As is seen in Table 1, the dominating process just ahead the
discontinuous jump is photoionization and, therefore, the shortest
relaxation time in the radiative precursor is that of photoionizations
from the ground state . The photoionization
relaxation time gradually decreases with increasing upstream velocity
from s for to
s for . Comparing
these relaxation times with the time needed for gas to flow through
the precursor we find that for models with
upstream velocities the ratio of the
photoionization relaxation time to the hydrodynamic time is
and only for the
photoionization relaxation time becomes nearly comparable with
hydrodynamic time: . Because for establishment
of the statistical equilibrium this ratio should be
, the ground state populations of the hydrogen
atom are in strong departure from the statistical equilibrium and the
hydrogen ionization degree cannot be described in assumption of
statistical equilibrium. For example, at the inner boundary of the
preshock region of the shock wave model with
the hydrogen ionization degree is , whereas
solution of the equations of statistical equilibrium gives
.
6.2. The thermalization and recombination zones
Behind the discontinuous jump the translational kinetic energy of
heavy particles is redistributed among various degrees of freedom
characterized by different relaxation times. The fastest relaxation
process is the translational kinetic energy exchange in elastic
collisions of electrons with neutral atoms and ions. Another
relaxation process is excitation of bound atomic states and ionization
of hydrogen atoms. Both excitation and ionization need, however, much
more collisions than translational kinetic energy exchange
(Stupochenko et al. 1967), so that just behind the discontinuous
jump the electron temperature gradually increases, whereas the
hydrogen ionization degree remains nearly constant. Note that although
the bound-bound transitions were not considered in our model, the
excitation of atomic states is taken into account as a result of
bound-free transitions.
In Fig. 6 are shown the electron temperature
and the temperature of heavy particles
as a function of distance from the
discontinuous jump for shock wave models with upstream velocities from
to . As is seen, the
characteristic time of the electron temperature growth rapidly
decreases with increasing upstream velocity. Furthermore, for
there is a temperature plateau within of which
both temperatures approximately do not change until they begin to
decrease. The existence of the temperature plateau is due to the fact
that for upstream velocities the electrons
acquire the energy from heavy particles due to elastic collisions with
neutral hydrogen atoms. The rate of energy gain in such collisions is
very small and gradually decreases when the electron temperature
approaches the temperature of heavy particles
. The temperature plateau appears when the
electron energy gain in elastic collisions with neutral hydrogen atoms
becomes almost negligible. At upstream velocities
the electron temperature plateau is ended by
the slight bump, the bump being wider and higher with increasing
.
![[FIGURE]](img226.gif) |
Fig. 6. The electron temperature (solid lines) and temperature of heavy particles (dashed lines) as a function of distance from the discontinuous jump in the postshock region
|
In the second and third columns of Table 2 are given both the
maximum value of the electron temperature in the postshock region as
well as the distance of this point from the discontiuous jump
expressed in cm. In the first column of Table 2 we give the
upstream velocity expressed, for the sake of convenience, in
. The electron temperature peak was not found
for the shock wave models with and in these
cases we give only the electron temperature of the plateau. The
electron temperature maximum can be approximately considered as a
point where temperatures of heavy particles and free electrons
equilize. Thus, the width of the relaxation zone where both
temperatures equalize decreases by a factor of
for the upstream velocity increasing from to
. It is of interest to note that for upstream
velocities the temperature of heavy particles
remains nearly constant until the electron
temperature begins to increase just before its drop. This is due to
the fact that at small upstream velocities the fractional abundance of
free electrons is so small that they cannot perceptibly affect the gas
of heavy particles.
![[TABLE]](img232.gif)
Table 2. Properties of the postshock region
The translational energy exchange between heavy particles and
electrons is due to elastic collisions of electrons with both neutral
hydrogen atoms and hydrogen ions. The cross section of elastic
collisions with hydrogen ions is much larger than that of electrons
with neutral atoms and, therefore, the translational energy gain by
electrons from heavy particles is strongly dependent on the hydrogen
ionization degree. The rates of energy gain by electrons in both these
processes are shown in Fig. 7. The abrupt decrease of
and occurs when both
temperatures equalize.
![[FIGURE]](img233.gif) |
Fig. 7. The rates of energy gain by electrons in elastic collisions with hydrogen ions (solid lines) and neutral hydrogen atoms (dashed lines)
|
For shock wave models considered in the present study the rate of
energy gain by electrons in elastic collisions with ions exceeds that
in elastic collisions with neutral atoms only when the hydrogen
ionization degree is . As is seen in
Fig. 7, for upstream velocities , the
electron temperature equalizes with temperature of heavy particles
only due to elastic collisions of electrons with neutral atoms.
Comparing with lower panel of Fig. 6 one sees that when the
electron temperature reaches the plateau, the rate of energy gain
decreases by nearly two orders of
magnitude.
At upstream velocities , the energy gain in
elastic collisions with ions begins to dominate only just before the
temperature drop. It is this increase of that
is responsible for the electron temperature peak near the end of the
electron temperature plateau. The translational energy gain by
electrons in elastic collisions with hydrogen ions becomes completely
dominating for . The gradual decrease of
just behind the discontinuous jump in the shock
wave models with (see upper panel of
Fig. 7) is due to the temperature dependence of the equipartition
time given in Eq. (34).
In Fig. 8 are shown the plots of the hydrogen ionization
degree in the postshock region of the shock wave models with upstream
velocities , 50 and .
Comparing with Fig. 6 one sees that the maximum of the hydrogen
ionization occurs at much larger distances from the discontinuous jump
than the maximum of the electron temperature. Very approximately the
distances of both these maxima can be expressed as power functions of
the upstream velocity:
![[EQUATION]](img242.gif)
In these approximate expressions, for the sake of convenience, the
distances and are
expressed in km whereas the upstream velocity is expressed in
. The maximum values of
as well as the corresponding distances from the discontinuous jump
expressed in cm are given in the fourth and fifth colums of
Table 2, respectively. According to the schematical division of
the shock wave noted above the maximum of can
be considered as the boundary between the thermalization and
recombination zones.
![[FIGURE]](img240.gif) |
Fig. 8. The hydrogen ionization degree as a function of the distance from the discontinuous jump in the shock wave models with upstream velocities , 50 and
|
The large distance between maxima of the electron temperature and
the hydrogen ionization degree implies that the degree of freedom
associated with ionization of hydrogen atoms is frozen in comparison
with excitation of translational motions. As a result, the gas flows
through the maximum of at smaller heat capacity
than it would be in equilibrium. Thus, when
the perceptible fraction of hydrogen atoms is ionized, the gas density
begins to increase. At larger distances the gas density goes on to
increase due to the radiative cooling (see Fig. 9).
![[FIGURE]](img246.gif) |
Fig. 9. The postshock gas density against the distance from the discontinuous jump. The numbers at the curves indicate the upstream velocity in
|
The total ionization rate of hydrogen atoms is a sum of
photoionizations and collisional ionizations, so that it depends on
the number density of free electrons. Because no ionization occurs
across the discontinuous jump, the total ionization rate behind the
discontinuous jump strongly depends on the ionization in the radiative
precursor. To demonstrate this dependence, in Fig. 10 are shown
the rates of ionizations and recombinations, both collisional and
radiative, in the postshock regions of the shock waves with upstream
velocities 30 and .
![[FIGURE]](img250.gif) |
Fig. 10. The rates of ionizations (solid lines) and recombinations (dashed lines) against the distance from the discontinuous jump X in the postshock region. Upper panel: ; lower panel:
|
For the shock wave model with the hydrogen
ionization degree at the discontinuous jump is
, therefore just behind the discontinuous jump
the role of collisional ionizations is negligible and the number
density of free electrons increases initially only due to
photoionizations. For the hydrogen ionization
degree at the discontinuous jump is . Free
electrons created in the precursor play a role of the seeds producing
yet more electrons and leading to the electron avalanche.
Compared to the preshock region where the contribution of opacity
sources nearly does not depend on the upstream velocity, the gradual
growth of the hydrogen ionization degree behind the discontinuous jump
leads to the appreciable dependence of postshock opacities on the
upstream velocity . For
the postshock opacity in the Balmer continuum is mainly due to
Rayleigh scattering by neutral hydrogen atoms. Only near the Balmer
edge, the opacity due to bound-free transitions from the second level
becomes most important. With increasing upstream velocity the role of
the bound-free transitions from the second level increases and for
this opacity mechanism becomes dominating
within the whole range of the Balmer continuum. The role of the
Thomson scattering is somewhat perceptible only near the Balmer edge,
whereas the free-free opacity can be neglected.
6.3. The radiation field
Although we did not include into the system of ordinary
differential equations (20) - (24) the terms with radiation energy
density and radiation pressure
, these quantities were evaluated as
![[EQUATION]](img254.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img255.gif)
together with total radiative flux and
divergence of the radiative flux each time
when the radiation transfer equation was solved. For the fixed spatial
coordinate X the ratio of the radiation energy density to the
total translational kinetic energy gradually increases with increasing
upstream velocity and is in the range for
. The ratio is highest
at the inner boundary of the preshock region because just behind the
discontinuous jump the total translational kinetic energy increases by
more than an order of magnitude, whereas the total change of
within the shock wave does not exceed 30%.
Because the most of the energy flux is contained in the radiative flux
, we find that for
. Thus, our assumption that the radiation
energy and radiation pressure can be neglected is enough good.
In Fig. 11 are shown the dependencies of
on the distance from the discontinuous jump for
the both preshock and postshock regions of the model with
. The increase of in the
preshock region with approaching to the discontinuous jump is due to
the radiative heating by the layers absorbing the Lyman continuum
radiation. Behind the discontinuous jump the radiation energy density
reaches the maximum in the hydrogen recombination zone.
![[FIGURE]](img259.gif) |
Fig. 11. The total radiation energy density as a function of distance from the discontinuous jump in the shock wave model with
|
The most of the shock wave radiation, by definition, is produced in
the layers where the divergence of radiative flux
reaches the maximum. These layers locate
nearly at the same distance from the discontinuous jump as the maximum
of the hydrogen ionization degree. The maximum of
exponentially increases with increasing
upstream velocity and for is given by
![[EQUATION]](img261.gif)
where the upstream velocity is expressed in
. Maximum values of are
given in the sixth column of Table 2.
As was noted above the shock wave models have a small optical depth
in the Balmer continuum ( ) and at the same time
they are opaque for the Lyman continuum photons. Therefore, the
radiation emerging from the both surfaces of the slab is mostly within
the Balmer continuum whereas the Lyman continuum radiation is
transported only within the narrow zone surrounding the discontinuous
jump. In the lower panel of Fig. 12 for the shock wave model with
upstream velocity is shown the Lyman continuum
radiative flux as a function of the spatial
coordinate X. This dependence is qualitatively similar to that
of the divergence of radiative flux shown in Fig. 3. The negative
flux corresponds to the radiation propagating in the direction of the
preshock region. The optical depth between minimum and maximum of
is for
and slowly decreases from
for to
for . This decrease is
mostly due to the growth of the hydrogen ionization degree in the
postshock region. The ratios of the maximum radiation flux transported
within the Lyman continuum to the total radiation flux are given in
the last column of Table 2.
![[FIGURE]](img267.gif) |
Fig. 12. The radiative flux within the Lyman continuum (lower panel) and the total radiative flux (upper panel) against the spatial coordinate X for the shock wave model with
|
In the upper panel of Fig. 12 for the same model is shown the
total radiative flux . This plot displays only
the very vicinity of the discontinuous jump. In the preshock region,
beyond the radiative precursor, the total radiative flux
remains constant since the divergence of
radiative flux is . In the postshock region the
total radiative flux gradually increases and asymtotically tends to
the same value as in the preshock but with the opposite sign. For all
shock wave models we obtained that the total radiative fluxes emerging
from both surfaces of the slab are .
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: April 20, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |