SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 333, 721-731 (1998)

Footnotes

1. Caccin & Severino (1979) and Chapman & Gingell (1984) have also considered rays outside the central plane, but for continuum radiation only.

2. Note that in Fig. 6a the MLRs for the 2-D models are always larger than for the 1-D model even at [FORMULA]. This is caused by the radial field component in the 2-D models that is absent in the 1-D model.

3. The interpretation by Keller et al. (1994) of an MLR near unity in intranetwork elements as showing [FORMULA] G, which can conceivably be due to inclined thin flux tubes with higher intrinsic field strengths is validated by the 15648 Å observations of Lin (1995) and Solanki et al. (1996b). These clearly show weak fields in intranetwork features.

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998

Online publication: April 20, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de