 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 333, 918-925 (1998)
4. Comparison with the theory of pulsation
In recent times the use of non-linear, non-local, time-dependent
convective models by Bono and coworkers has produced a large amount of
theoretical predictions concerning RR Lyrae pulsations. (See the most
recent papers by Bono et al. 1997a (BCCIM), 1997b (BCCM) and reference
therein). Taking advantage of this theoretical framework, in this
section we will discuss the pulsational properties of the three
studied variables.
As a first step, Fig. 5 shows the location in the Bailey
(period-amplitude) diagram for our three variables, as compared with
selected samples of field RRab and with theoretical results from
BCCIM; the field stars were selected to lie within the limits of
metallicity given in the figure. Periods and amplitudes of field RR
Lyrae are from Blanco (1992), while metallicities are from Layden
(1994, 1995) and Layden et al. (1996). In all three panels our
variables are reported with four-pointed stars: going toward lower
periods one finds AW Dra, CN Lyr and AQ Lyr. One finds that AW Dra
lies in a region where only low metallicity pulsators occur.
Accordingly one can predict for this variable a metallicity as low as
-1.4. On the contrary, both AQ Lyr and CN Lyr
clearly are members of the high metallicity group, as expected in
particular for CN Lyr ( -0.26). One may notice
that both stars lie on the lower envelope of the observed
distributions, well below theoretical expectations even for "young"
massive pulsators (see Fig. 16b in BCCIM and the discussion in that
paper). We conclude that, if these stars are "bona fide" ab-type
pulsators, theory has to be improved to account for such kind of
unpredicted variables.
![[FIGURE]](img22.gif) |
Fig. 5. The Bailey diagram for the three RR Lyrae of this study, in comparison with selected theoretical and observational results. For details see the text and Figs. 16a and 16b in BCCIM
|
To allow a closer comparison with predicted lightcurves one can
estimate temperatures from the observed colors, provided that the
reddenings are known. For AQ Lyr Burstein & Heiles (1978) provided
= 0.127 mag. Since AQ Lyr has
values by Suntzeff et al. (1994), one may use
the method by Sturch (1966), as improved by Blanco (1992), to test
this reddening with an independent estimate. As a result we find for
AQ Lyr = 0.13 mag, in excellent agreement with
the previous value. For CN Lyr and AW Dra the literature gives no
indications. To get the missing values, we again used the reddening
maps by Burstein & Heiles (1982), obtaining for AW Dra
= 0.06 mag and for CN Lyr
= 0.21 mag. According to the quoted authors,
the error on these estimates is of the order of 0.03 mag.
An alternative way to derive information about reddenings is that
of using statistical relations such as those provided by Caputo &
De Santis (1992). These authors used the Lub (1977) sample of field ab
type variables to derive relations between periods, B amplitudes,
metallicities and mean de-reddened colors. Using their Eq. (10) we
obtain for CN Lyr = 0.38 mag and thus
= 0.20 mag, in good agreement with the value
given by Burstein & Heiles (1982). The same procedure for AQ Lyr
provides =0.33 mag, this means
= 0.10 mag, slightly lower (about 0.03) than
the value previously determined from Blanco's reddening law and from
Burstein & Heiles (1978) maps but within the errors. Hence we
adopt those estimates in order to compute the temperature of the
variable in Table 6. For AW Dra there is no available metallicity
evaluation in the literature, but we can estimate lower and upper
limits for it from our Fig. 5. We get, for
, =0.33 mag and, for
, =0.32 mag, which in
terms of reddening means mag, well within the
error of the reddening as derived from Burstein & Heiles (1982)
maps.
![[TABLE]](img30.gif)
Table 6. Selected fundamental quantities for AW Dra, AQ Lyr and CN Lyr.
After correction for reddening, mean colors have been evaluated in
three ways: as intensity-weighted ( or
) and as magnitude-weighted
; all these values are reported in
Table 5. However Bono et al. (1995, BCS hereafter) have once
again shown that the color of the static model does not match exactly
any observed mean color. To all these mean colors we thus applied the
corresponding correction as tabulated by BCS for Z=0.001; we estimated
that errors due to the different metallicity should not exceed few
thousandths of magnitude, thus preserving the general trend
. After applying the BCS correction the three
substantially different mean colors for each star become very similar,
so we proceeded to average them and we took this mean value as our
best estimate of the RR Lyrae mean colors, as given by
in Table 5. Finally, RR Lyrae mean colors
have been translated into temperatures by estimating gravities from
the period - gravity relation obtained from the period - temperature -
luminosity - mass relation by BCCM and using Kurucz (1992) models. One
finds for both AQ Lyr and CN Lyr, whereas for
AW Dra one has . The estimated error on the
temperature is about , largely dominated by the
error in the reddening. Temperatures for the three RR Lyrae studied in
this paper are reported in Table 6 together with further
pertinent quantities.
Given period and temperature, one can obtain an estimate of the
star luminosity from the period - temperature - luminosity - mass
relation, provided that suitable assumptions of the pulsator masses
are made. Evolutionary constraints indicate that one can safely assume
M= 0.53-0.58 for the two metal rich RR Lyrae,
and M=0.65-0.75 for AW Dra. Making use of the
relations given by BCCM (corrected by for
fundamental metal rich pulsators, as stated by BCCIM) one finally
derives the range of luminosity given in Table 7 under the two
alternative assumptions about the mode of pulsation. We are now able
to compare observed lightcurves with the atlas presented by BCCIM and
BCCM. For the various stars one finds:
![[TABLE]](img41.gif)
Table 7. Luminosities coming from period-temperature-mass-luminosity relations (see text) by BCCM, for the three RR Lyrae investigated in this study; F and FO mean fundamental and first overtone pulsation mode respectively.
CN Lyr: If this is an F-pulsator, it would be out of the
range explored by theory when Z=0.01. However, comparison with results
for Z=0.02 suggests that the theoretical rising time of an F-pulsator
should be much shorter than observed. Comparison with theoretical
predictions for Z=0.01 and Z=0.02 could suggest that this star should
be a FO pulsator crossing the strip at large luminosity well above the
ZAHB. Even though the star is beyond the limit of the atlas, one
finds, e.g., that Z=0.02 FO pulsators with similar temperatures and
large luminosities ( = 1.61 and 1.81) show the
asymmetric lightcurve disclosed by our observations. Note that in this
case one cannot derive the intrinsic color from the quoted Caputo
& De Santis (1992) relation, and the reasonable prediction about
the CN Lyr reddening should be regarded as obtained by chance.
However, as suggested by our referee, on observational grounds CN Lyr
(like, e.g., FW Lup in the Lub (1977) sample) has to be regarded as a
typical low-amplitude, type b fundamental pulsator, as found towards
the red edge of the instability strip. Appropriate theoretical
investigation is needed before possible mismatches with the theory can
be discussed.
AQ Lyr: There is, apparently, no way to fit the observed
lightcurve to theoretical predictions for FO pulsators. The shape of
the curve is in good agreement with predictions for F pulsators in the
quoted range of luminosities and temperature. Note that the luminosity
is the one predicted by BCCIM for metal rich HB stars. However,
bearing in mind that the bolometric amplitude is roughly comparable
with the amplitude in the V band (Marconi, private communication)
theory predicts a larger amplitude. A similar instance has been
already discussed in BCCM (see Fig. 18 in that paper).
AW Dra: This star appears to be a classical ab type
pulsator. As a matter of fact, in BCCM one finds that a metal poor FO
pulsator at the required large luminosity should have a symmetric
lightcurve, contrary to observation. Both amplitude and shape of the
lightcurve appear in reasonable agreement with predictions for F
pulsators, even if the atlas lacks models in the range
. Thus one finds that AW Dra is a fundamental
pulsator crossing the strip at , i.e. above the
ZAHB luminosity level.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: April 28, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |