Astron. Astrophys. 333, 1100-1106 (1998)
5. Expansion of under the rigidity approximation
Eq. (14) has shown that, under the standard PN gauge the 1PN
vector potential can be expanded in terms of
and . We find that the
expansion of is not complicated in form. But
, the time-derivative of ,
is a set of physical quantities that are algebraically independent of
. So it is safer to say that three sets of
Cartesian multipole moments ,
and generate together
the 1PN potential . Up to now, there is no
explicit expressions of
, i.e. the evolution equations of
. This makes it
difficult to compute . But in fact, we can use
some approximate methods or models for computing
.
Because the vector potential only generate
the 1PN effects, all the physical quantities in the expression of
only need to reach the accuracy of Newtonian
order. Thus we can adopt the rigidity approximation, i.e. assume that
the Earth is a rigid body rotating at an angular velocity
, neglecting the non-rigidity correction to the
real Earth. Under this assumption, the vector potential can be
expressed in terms of and
. It is preferable that, we think,
in place of would make
the expression of independent of
time-derivatives of Cartesian multipole moments. Moreover, the
multipole moments in are also reduced to two
sets ( and replace
, and
).
According to the rigidity approximation, we have
= . Inserting it into
Eq. (14), and after a tedious calculation (see Appendix), the
approximate expression of the vector potential
can be obtained as
![[EQUATION]](img106.gif)
Inserting Eq. (27) into Eq. (17), we have
![[EQUATION]](img107.gif)
can be expanded in terms of
and
, which are the
projections of and in
the co-rotating system. The expression of is
similar to Eq. (27), it reads
![[EQUATION]](img111.gif)
The terms containing in Eq. (28) and
in Eq. (27) are zero as
. Comparing Eq. (28) with Eq. (24), we
can obtain the relations between ,
and ,
. For example, as we
have
![[EQUATION]](img114.gif)
where . Applying the rigidity approximation,
i.e.
![[EQUATION]](img116.gif)
and using the following identity
![[EQUATION]](img117.gif)
it is easy to show that Eq. (29) is consistent with
Eq. (26).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: April 28, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |