Astron. Astrophys. 334, 409-419 (1998)
3. Generalisation to a sample of structures
Future CMB (space and balloon borne) experiments will measure the
temperature fluctuations with very high accuracy
( ) at small angular scales. In our attempts to
foresee what the CMB maps would look like and what would be the
spurious contributions due to the various astrophysical foregrounds,
we investigate the generalisation of the computations made above to a
sample of structures. This is done in order to address the questions
of the cumulative effect and contamination to the CMB.
Some work has already been done by Tuluie & Laguna 1995 and
Tuluie, Laguna & Anninos 1996 who pointed out the moving lens
effect in their study of the varying potential effects on the CMB. In
their study, they used N-body simulations to evolve the matter
inhomogeneities, from the decoupling time until the present, in which
they propagated CMB photons. They have estimated the anisotropies
generated by three sources of time-variations of the potential:
intrinsic changes in the gravitational potential, decaying potential
effect from the evolution of gravitational potential in
models, and peculiar bulk motions of the
structures across the sky. They evaluated the contribution of the
latter effect for rather large angular scales ( )
due to the lack of numerical resolution (about
Mpc) and gave estimates of the power spectrum of these effects.
With another approach, we make a similar analysis in the case of
the moving lens effect extended to angular scales down to a few tens
of arcseconds. We also simulate attempts at the detection and
subtraction of the moving lens effect. Our approach is quite different
from that of Tuluie, Laguna & Anninos, in that it is
semi-empirical and apply the formalism developed for an individual
structure (Sect. 2.) to each object from a sample of structures. The
predicted number of objects in the sample being derived from the
Press-Schechter formalism for the structure formation (Press &
Schechter 1974).
3.1. Predicted population of collapsed objects
An estimate of the cumulative effect of the moving lenses requires
a knowledge of the number of objects of a given mass that will
contribute to the total effect at a given epoch. We assume that this
number is accurately predicted by the abundance of collapsed dark
matter halos as a function of their masses and redshifts, as derived
using the Press-Schechter formalism. This approach was used in a
previous paper (Aghanim et al. 1997) which predicted the SZ
contribution to the CMB signal in a standard CDM model. In addition to
the "traditional" standard Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model
( ), in this paper we also address the question
of a generalised moving lens effect in other cosmological models. We
extend the Press-Schechter formalism to an open CDM model (OCDM) with
no cosmological constant ( ), and also a flat
universe with a non zero cosmological constant (
CDM model) ( and ). Here
is the density parameter,
is the cosmological constant given in units of
and is the Hubble
constant. We take km/s/Mpc, and assume
throughout the paper.
In any case, the general analytic expression for the number density
of spherical collapsed halos in the mass range
can be written as (Lacey & Cole 1993):
![[EQUATION]](img61.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img62.gif)
where is the mean background density at
redshift z and is the overdensity of a
linearly evolving structure. The mass variance
of the fluctuation spectrum, filtered on mass scale M, is
related to the linear power spectrum of the initial density
fluctuations through:
![[EQUATION]](img67.gif)
where W is the Fourier transform of the window function over
which the variance is smoothed (Peebles 1980) and R is the
scale associated with mass M. In the assumption of a scale-free
initial power spectrum with spectral index n, the variance on
mass scale M can be expressed in terms of
, the rms density fluctuation in sphere
of Mpc size. The relationship between these two
quantities is given by (Mathiesen & Evrard 1997):
![[EQUATION]](img70.gif)
with . It has been shown that
varies with the cosmological model and in
particular with the density parameter . A
general empirical fitting function ( ) was
derived from a power spectrum normalisation to the cluster abundance
with a rather good agreement in the values of the parameters A
and B (White, Efstathiou & Frenk 1993, Eke, Cole &
Frenk 1996, Viana & Liddle 1996). In our work, we use the "best
fitting values" from Viana & Liddle (1996) which are
and for an open CDM
universe ( and ) or
for a flat universe with a non zero
cosmological constant ( ). We use
for the spectral index in the cluster mass
regime which is the theoretically predicted value. Some local
constraints on the temperature abundance of clusters favour
(Henry & Arnaud 1991, Oukbir, Bartlett
& Blanchard 1997) but we did not investigate this case.
3.2. Peculiar velocities
On the scale of clusters of galaxies, typically 8
Mpc, one can assume that the density
fluctuations are in the linear regime. Therefore the fluctuations are
closely related to the initial conditions from which the structures
arise. In fact, in the assumption of an isotropic Gaussian
distribution of the initial density perturbations, the initial power
spectrum gives a complete description of the
velocity field through the three-dimensional rms velocity
( ) predicted by the linear gravitational
instability for an irrotational field at a given scale R
(Peebles 1993). This velocity is given by:
![[EQUATION]](img83.gif)
where is the expansion parameter, the Hubble
constant H and the density parameter
vary with time (Caroll, Press & Turner 1992). The function
is accurately approximated by
(Peebles 1980) even if there is a non zero
cosmological constant (Lahav et al. 1991). Furthermore, under the
assumptions of linear regime and Gaussian distribution of the density
fluctuations, the structures move with respect to the global Hubble
flow with peculiar velocities following a Gaussian distribution
which is fully described by
. This prediction is in agreement with numerical
simulations (Bahcall et al. 1994, Moscardini et al. 1996).
The present observational status of peculiar cluster velocities
puts few constraints on the cosmological models. Results from the
Hudson (1994) sample using -
and IRTF distance estimators give respectively
and km/s, a composite
sample gives km/s (Moscardini et al 1996).
Giovanelli's (1996) sample gives a smaller value,
km/s.
In our paper we compute the three-dimensional rms peculiar
velocity on scale 8 Mpc (typical virial radius
of a galaxy cluster) using Eq. 6for the three cosmological models.
This is because large scale velocities are mostly sensitive to long
wavelength density fluctuations. This smoothing allows us to get rid
of the nonlinear effects on small scales but it also tends to
underestimate the peculiar velocities of the smallest objects that we
are interested in. Nevertheless, with regard to the rather important
dispersion in the observational values (320 780
km/s), we use the predicted theoretical values, which range between
400 and 500 km/s, and are hence in general agreement with the
observational data.
3.3. Simulations
For each cosmological model, we generate a simulated map of the
moving lens effect in order to analyse the contribution to the signal
in terms of temperature fluctuations. The simulations are essentially
based on the studies of Aghanim et al. (1997). In the following, we
describe briefly the main hypothesis that we make in simulating the
maps of the temperature fluctuations induced by the moving lens effect
associated with small groups and clusters of galaxies
( and ). The predicted
number of massive objects is derived from a distribution of sources
using the Press-Schechter formalism normalised (Viana & Liddle
1996) using the X-ray temperature distribution function derived from
Henry & Arnaud (1991) data. This normalisation has also been used
by Mathiesen & Evrard (1997) for the ROSAT Brightest Clusters
Sample compiled by Ebeling et al. (1997). The position and direction
of motion of each object are random. Their peculiar velocities are
also random within an assumed Gaussian distribution. Here again, the
correlations were neglected because the effect is maximum very close
to the central part of the structure (about 100 kpc) whereas the
correlation length is between 5 and 20 Mpc (Bahcall 1988). The final
maps account for the cumulative effect of the moving lenses with
redshifts lower than . We refer the reader to
Aghanim et al. (1997) for a detailed description of the
simulation.
In this paper, some changes and improvements have been made to our
previous study (Aghanim et al. 1997). In this paper, the predicted
source counts (Eq. 5, Sect. 3.1) are in agreement with more recent
data. They are also adapted to the various cosmological models that we
have assumed. The standard deviation of the peculiar velocity
distribution is computed using Eq. 6and is in reasonable
agreement with the data. The advantage of using this equation is that
the variations with time and cosmology are directly handled in the
expression. As we pointed out in Sect. 2, the secondary effects
we study here are associated with the whole mass of the structure, not
only the gas mass. Therefore, the gas part of structures are modelled
using the -profile (as in the previous case) to
simulate the SZ effect. Whereas the density profile (Eq. 4) is used to
simulate the potential well of the moving lens effect. We note that
the results of the N-body simulations of Navarro, Frenk & White
(1996) are consistent with the assumption of an intra-cluster
isothermal gas in hydrostatic equilibrium with a NFW halo.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: May 15, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |