![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 334, 409-419 (1998) 5. ConclusionsIn our work, we investigate the secondary fluctuations induced by
moving lenses with masses ranging from those of groups of galaxies to
those of clusters of galaxies in a simple way, based on predicted
structure counts and simulated maps. This method allows us to explore
a rather wide range of scales ( The results of our analysis are obtained under the assumption of a universe that never re-ionises, which is of course not the case. The re-ionisation, if it is homogeneous, is supposed to somewhat ease the task of extraction of the pattern. In fact, its main effect is to damp the angular power spectrum of the primary anisotropies on small scales, shifting the cut-off towards larger scales. In this case, the effect of moving lenses dominates over the CMB fluctuations, and the SZ kinetic is not as high as it is on very small scales. However, if the re-ionisation is late and inhomogeneous, it generates additional SZ kinetic-type secondary fluctuations (Aghanim et al. 1996) without damping the power spectrum by more than a few percent. Here, the re-ionisation might worsen the analysis at small scales. In any case, there could be some other additional secondary fluctuations principally due to the Vishniac effect, that arise in a re-ionised universe. Our work thus gives a "best case" configuration of the problem, with all other effects tending to worsen the situation. We found that the secondary fluctuations induced by the moving
gravitational lenses can be as high as We nevertheless analysed the simulated maps using an adapted wavelet technique in order to extract the moving lens fluctuations. We conclude that the contribution of the secondary anisotropies due to the moving lenses is thus negligible whatever the cosmological model. Therefore it will not affect the future CMB measurements except as a background contribution. We have highlighted the fact that the moving lens fluctuations have a very significant spatial signature but we did not succeed in separating this contribution from the other signals. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998 Online publication: May 15, 1998 ![]() |